• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fbi bombshell: Obama used pseudonym in emails with clinton

A code name for the President is quite common in high levels of government. That in itself is no big deal. The big deal is that the President has repeatedly stated that he learned about Hillary's private e-mail system in the 'newspapers', i.e. via the media, just as all the rest of us did, even as he himself was communicating to her on that very system.

Anti-Hillary people will care.
Pro-Hillary people will shrug it of as inconsequential just as they do everything else.

The world still turns.

The good news is that the entire population on both sides of the political fence seems understand that the entire government is riddled by corruption and crime.

The bad news is that nobody cares as long as they get their own personal payoff.

We are a long way off the path that the Founders hoped we might follow.

They revolted over a Breakfast Beverage. Those guys were bad a$$! We are as weak and corrupted as our leaders and getting worse.

Jefferson cries in his grave over what we have done to his Declaration.
 
yes it does

It may belong in the conspiracy section, but only as it accurately defines the conspiracy of the Washington DC Government to defraud the American Public by use of the institutions of government.
 
So, knowingly participating in breaking the law, under a false name or not, is a routine security procedure?

It seems like you may have missed the point of the post entirely.

Your point was false political outrage, judging by the responses you got proven wrong.
 
Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal - POLITICO


TOLD CBSNEWS HE LEARNED ABOUT HER SERVER FROM 'NEWS ACCOUNTS'

Obama weighs in on Hillary Clinton's private emails - CBS News


Nothing but lies lies lies

Same ol' Obama, lie to the electorate. Nothing new. Nothing to see here. Move on.
Using a Code Word (or pseudonym) instead of the real name of the President in government communications is not uncommon.
Trying to make a big deal about the President not using his real name in communications is most definitely a bunch of
hoopla over nothing. However, the other parts brought up in the emails are still a big deal.

This is quite routine in security operations. Though that probably does little to aid in clearing up your misinformation, or cure your fake outrage.

Stop diverting. The point isn't whether he used a pseudonym or not, the point is when he knew Hillary was using a private email server. Unless he's a complete moron (might be the case) or willfully ignorant (more likely), clearly he did know about Hillary's private email server before he said he did, and it wasn't from the news media coverage of the scandal.

A code name for the President is quite common in high levels of government. That in itself is no big deal. The big deal is that the President has repeatedly stated that he learned about Hillary's private e-mail system in the 'newspapers', i.e. via the media, just as all the rest of us did, even as he himself was communicating to her on that very system.

Anti-Hillary people will care.
Pro-Hillary people will shrug it of as inconsequential just as they do everything else.

The world still turns.

Exactly. Obama and his lying about this is just his modis operandi.
 
Same ol' Obama, lie to the electorate. Nothing new. Nothing to see here. Move on.





Stop diverting. The point isn't whether he used a pseudonym or not, the point is when he knew Hillary was using a private email server. Unless he's a complete moron (might be the case) or willfully ignorant (more likely), clearly he did know about Hillary's private email server before he said he did, and it wasn't from the news media coverage of the scandal.



Exactly. Obama and his lying about this is just his modis operandi.

You know when its political season, the desperation is rather obvious, from both camps.
 
Your point was false political outrage, judging by the responses you got proven wrong.


My point is that the President lied. What point did you think was mine?

You asserted that the actions of the president were standard procedure. Due to this comment, I assumed that you missed the point of the post to which you responded which was that the president was caught in a lie.

There are various posts in this thread that seem to have missed the point of the OP. That does not lessen the meaning of the OP. It only exposes the lack of comprehension by those that don't grasp the meaning.

It seems like everyone who tries, in anyway to defend Hillary or their actions with the Clintons, gets caught in a lie.

Here's a quote from the OP to help refresh your understanding:

<snip>
"Nothing but lies lies lies"
<snip>

Seems to me that it's hard to miss the intent, but there you go.
 
My point is that the President lied. What point did you think was mine?

You asserted that the actions of the president were standard procedure. Due to this comment, I assumed that you missed the point of the post to which you responded which was that the president was caught in a lie.

There are various posts in this thread that seem to have missed the point of the OP. That does not lessen the meaning of the OP. It only exposes the lack of comprehension by those that don't grasp the meaning.

It seems like everyone who tries in anyway to defend hillary or their actions with the Clintons, gets caught in a lie.

And that is nice for you, believe what you want, the rest of us try to avoid hyberbole.
 
The good news is that the entire population on both sides of the political fence seems understand that the entire government is riddled by corruption and crime.

The bad news is that nobody cares as long as they get their own personal payoff.

We are a long way off the path that the Founders hoped we might follow.

They revolted over a Breakfast Beverage. Those guys were bad a$$! We are as weak and corrupted as our leaders and getting worse.

Jefferson cries in his grave over what we have done to his Declaration.

I agree that Jefferson would be totally dismayed at what we have done to his Declaration and to the Constitution that evolved from it.

I am not quite ready to agree with you that nobody cares. That a great many of us do care is precisely why Donald Trump has a fair shot at becoming President of the United States. It is not because so many admire Trump all that much, if at all. It is because we know that to continue as we are is to move us ever closer to being one of those tired European societies with lowered standard of living, less opportunity to improve one's personal circumstances, and a sort of resigned acceptance, even contentment, to just maintain the status quo. Trump is the ONLY chance we have, however slim, of beginning the necessary process of breaking down the status quo achieved by the permanent political class in government. It sure as hell won't happen with a President Hillary Clinton.
 
Same ol' Obama, lie to the electorate. Nothing new. Nothing to see here. Move on.





Stop diverting. The point isn't whether he used a pseudonym or not, the point is when he knew Hillary was using a private email server. Unless he's a complete moron (might be the case) or willfully ignorant (more likely), clearly he did know about Hillary's private email server before he said he did, and it wasn't from the news media coverage of the scandal.



Exactly. Obama and his lying about this is just his modis operandi.

It is absolutely incredible how often President Obama has gone to the microphone to insist that he didn't know. . .nobody told him. . .he learned about this or that or the other scandal in the same way the rest of us did, i.e. in the newspapers or on the nightly news. So why in the hell didn't he know? How could he claim to be on top of things or carrying out his responsibilities and not know? Why haven't heads rolled when he was not informed? And is he so detached or ignorant or out of touch that he wouldn't know he was sending an e-mail to other than a secure government e-mail address?

But again his supporters won't care. Her supporters won't care. They set the bar so low for what they expect of their leaders that the "D" after a name is sufficient qualifications. It is really sad. And scary.
 
This is quite routine in security operations. Though that probably does little to aid in clearing up your misinformation, or cure your fake outrage.

Apparently, Obamahaters think he should have signed all his confidential emails to his cabinet members, including his SoS, with: "Yours truly, Barack Obama, President of the United States." I had almost come to think their hatred for this man couldn't drive them any further into insanity but that is, obviously, sadly, not the case.
 
It is absolutely incredible how often President Obama has gone to the microphone to insist that he didn't know. . .nobody told him. . .

Oh, really. Care to link to just one example of this? Just one. Shouldn't be hard if he did it so often. Oh, and not one of the rightwing pukefunnel outlets. It's got to be a real news source.
 
Last edited:
And that is nice for you, believe what you want, the rest of us try to avoid hyberbole.

This president could come out on a sunny, warm day and call it "beautiful" and these haters would accuse him of "lying." Their terminal hatred is both absurd and incurable.
 
This president could come out on a sunny, warm day and call it "beautiful" and these haters would accuse him of "lying." Their terminal hatred is both absurd and incurable.

Its the same hatred they have for Hilldog, some of which is deserved, some not. There are going to be lots of crying into cornflakes on Nov 9, lets hope sanity prevails, but I doubt it, this is the same electorate that voted for Bush2 twice.
 
I agree that Jefferson would be totally dismayed at what we have done to his Declaration and to the Constitution that evolved from it.

I am not quite ready to agree with you that nobody cares. That a great many of us do care is precisely why Donald Trump has a fair shot at becoming President of the United States. It is not because so many admire Trump all that much, if at all. It is because we know that to continue as we are is to move us ever closer to being one of those tired European societies with lowered standard of living, less opportunity to improve one's personal circumstances, and a sort of resigned acceptance, even contentment, to just maintain the status quo. Trump is the ONLY chance we have, however slim, of beginning the necessary process of breaking down the status quo achieved by the permanent political class in government. It sure as hell won't happen with a President Hillary Clinton.

Though a sideline, and I am not trying to derail the thread, but a more sensible solution to the DC cronyism is term limits for Congress. Many of the problems in DC are not rooted in the executice branch, but in Congress, members who have out stayed there welcome due to being in the back pocket of too many special interest. Two terms for the house, one for the Senate.
 
Q. If nobody knew about Clinton's private server (except for Clinton, of course) until about a year and a half ago, how do Obamahaters make the case that he must have known about it 4 years ago?

A. They don't. They never make the case for the lies they tell about this President. They never have. They never will. They just keep piling on the lies and he ignores them and keeps on presidentin' to the approval of the majority of Americans.
 
Using a Code Word (or pseudonym) instead of the real name of the President in government communications is not uncommon.

But is proves he knew of her private server. Assuming it wasn't an RSVP acceptance for Chelsea's wedding.
 
this is the same electorate that voted for Bush2 twice.

It's more the same electorate that elected Obama twice and despite the volume of the screeching from the rightwing deplorables, it's tending even more toward that electorate. I never make predictions about elections but the way things are shaping up now is pretty much the same way as it looked at this point in 2012.
 
Using a Code Word (or pseudonym) instead of the real name of the President in government communications is not uncommon.
Not really the point. The point is if he was mailing to an email address managed on a private (in other words not her .mil or .gov account) server he lied about not knowing about the private server.
 
Q. If nobody knew about Clinton's private server (except for Clinton, of course) until about a year and a half ago, how do Obamahaters make the case that he must have known about it 4 years ago?

A. They don't. They never make the case for the lies they tell about this President. They never have. They never will. They just keep piling on the lies and he ignores them and keeps on presidentin' to the approval of the majority of Americans.

Still, Hillary is so tech challenged, damn she needs a couple IT classes, she could have avoided this entire debacle from the outset by being honest, when she feels cornered she covers her ass, therefore the lies. Is it ingrained in her to lie all the time, I do not think so. Some canidates lie to protect themselves, other canidates lie on a daily, almost hourly rate because they can. As the writers of South Park alluded to, we have a choice, Giant Douche or Turd Sandwich? So true!!
 
Still, Hillary is so tech challenged, damn she needs a couple IT classes, she could have avoided this entire debacle from the outset by being honest, when she feels cornered she covers her ass, therefore the lies. Is it ingrained in her to lie all the time, I do not think so. Some canidates lie to protect themselves, other canidates lie on a daily, almost hourly rate because they can. As the writers of South Park alluded to, we have a choice, Giant Douche or Turd Sandwich? So true!!
:lamo

Hillary lied about her own name.

Democrats could **** on a piece of bread...you could WATCH them **** on a piece of bread...and they could hand you that piece of bread and tell you it was a new kind of sandwich spread and you'll love it and you would eat it and ask for seconds.
 
The FBI has become a tool of the Administration.

Perhaps it always has been.

With every passing day, it becomes more apparent that the institutions of the US government are corrupt and rotting pools of filth that needs to be eliminated and replaced.

I bet hoover is rolling over in his grave.
 
:lamo

Hillary lied about her own name.

Democrats could **** on a piece of bread...you could WATCH them **** on a piece of bread...and they could hand you that piece of bread and tell you it was a new kind of sandwich spread and you'll love it and you would eat it and ask for seconds.

Morning dose of hyberbole courtesy of VM

Good morning Sunshine!!
 
Back
Top Bottom