• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When Will Criminal Hillary call Muslim Terrorists "Deplorable"?

disneydude said:
LOL....you have seriously got to be kidding. Trumps plan? - Trample on the Constitution and give up our American values because terrorist are scary. In the words of Benjamin Franklin " Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Click to expand...

Amazing when Leftists pull their heads from their rectums only to use that quote from Franklin!!!

The Left are the biggest whores... begging the state to run their private lives with one government program after another... Expecting government to punish wealth creators in the process... Giving up... Begging for Liberty to be thieved at every turn.

It's as the great Senator Paul Laxalt from NV used to say... Everyday Congress meets, you lose a little bit more of your Liberty.
 
disneydude said:
LOL....you have seriously got to be kidding. Trumps plan? - Trample on the Constitution and give up our American values because terrorist are scary. In the words of Benjamin Franklin " Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Click to expand...

I see. So you agree Clinton has no plan. Perhaps it's to issue brooms, plywood and condolences up after the attacks.
 
disneydude said:
I agree. The patriot act was and is a disastrous attack on our rights and values. Trump wants to take it a bit further. Insane.
Click to expand...

So what do you think Hillary's "Intelligence Surge" will be? She claimed that this morning.
 
zimmer said:
Amazing when Leftists pull their heads from their rectums only to use that quote from Franklin!!!

The Left are the biggest whores... begging the state to run their private lives with one government program after another... Expecting government to punish wealth creators in the process... Giving up... Begging for Liberty to be thieved at every turn.

It's as the great Senator Paul Laxalt from NV used to say... Everyday Congress meets, you lose a little bit more of your Liberty.
Click to expand...

Blah blah blah....when you can't respond to the issue, blather generics. typical.
 
zimmer said:
Amazing when Leftists pull their heads from their rectums only to use that quote from Franklin!!!

The Left are the biggest whores... begging the state to run their private lives with one government program after another... Expecting government to punish wealth creators in the process... Giving up... Begging for Liberty to be thieved at every turn.

It's as the great Senator Paul Laxalt from NV used to say... Everyday Congress meets, you lose a little bit more of your Liberty.
Click to expand...

Nailed it!
 
zimmer said:
When?

When will they come out and call it Islamic Terrorism? And "deplorable"?

When?
Click to expand...

They won't. The millions of liberal/progressive minions will continue on with their "islamophobe" attacks against anyone who disagrees with their dangerous immigration policies.
 
ocean515 said:
I see. So you're going to avoid the questions and just continue with the blather.

Cool. I'll move on.
Click to expand...

Its a legitimate question. You want to mock Hilary's comment about an intelligence surge....isn't it fair game to ask if you prefer Trumps "Extreme Vetting" (which is already being done, he just didn't realize it...doh)?

When will the "intelligence surge" start? I'm guessing it would likely be one of the first steps that President Clinton will take.
 
RetiredUSN said:
They won't. The millions of liberal/progressive minions will continue on with their "islamophobe" attacks against anyone who disagrees with their dangerous immigration policies.
Click to expand...

What EXACTLY is the "dangerous immigration policies" that you speak of? Not banning all Muslims from coming into the United States? Be specific. thanks
 
disneydude said:
Its a legitimate question. You want to mock Hilary's comment about an intelligence surge....isn't it fair game to ask if you prefer Trumps "Extreme Vetting" (which is already being done, he just didn't realize it...doh)?

When will the "intelligence surge" start? I'm guessing it would likely be one of the first steps that President Clinton will take.
Click to expand...

I asked what her "intelligence surge" was. I'll move on if you want to continue to avoid answering the question. I'm sure we both have better things to do.
 
zimmer said:
When?

When will they come out and call it Islamic Terrorism? And "deplorable"?

When?
Click to expand...

I don't think her face (or her brain) can function is such a manner that she can speak these terms.

I think she's incapable to mouth the words and make the needed sounds.
 
disneydude said:
What EXACTLY is the "dangerous immigration policies" that you speak of? Not banning all Muslims from coming into the United States? Be specific. thanks
Click to expand...

Not taking in Syrian refugees would be a good start.
 
blaxshep said:
Close but no cigar, We are at war with radical ISLAM. Just say it!
Click to expand...
1.)Arent jihadis a militant muslim at war against non-believers? So doesnt the word jihad include Islam in its definition?
2.)But the thing also is we are not simply just at war against "radical Islam"... Many countries that could be labeled as "governed by radical Islamists" are our buddies.... Saudis, UAE, Bahrain, even the current Afghani government. Could they not?
 
ocean515 said:
I asked what her "intelligence surge" was. I'll move on if you want to continue to avoid answering the question. I'm sure we both have better things to do.
Click to expand...

I misread your question. What WILL it be? I don't pretend to actually know but if you listened to what she talked about, she talked about working with Silicon Valley computer companies to partnership with government to find smarter ways to track terrorist activity and to also find ways to help prevent their online activities.

Now....lets talk about the question you are avoiding. Do you prefer Trumps plan of "Extreme Vetting" (which we are already doing, which I'm sure you are aware because I suspect you are a bit smarter than Trump)? I'll await your answer...(but won't expect one).
 
blaxshep said:
Not taking in Syrian refugees would be a good start.
Click to expand...

We have always taken in refugees that are victims of genocide. You do know that these are "Christians" right? I suspect that you didn't know that
 
TheDemSocialist said:
1.)Arent jihadis a militant muslim at war against non-believers? So doesnt the word jihad include Islam in its definition?
2.)But the thing also is we are not simply just at war against "radical Islam"... Many countries that could be labeled as "governed by radical Islamists" are our buddies.... Saudis, UAE, Bahrain, even the current Afghani government. Could they not?
Click to expand...

wipe them out all of them - Bing video
 
faithful_servant said:
Interesting choice of quotes: When an attack comes on foreign soil, she's quick to denounce radical Islam, but what about in response to attacks on OUR soil??
Click to expand...

After the Orlando attack: "I have clearly said many, many times we face terrorist enemies who use Islam to justify slaughtering innocent people. We have to stop them and we will. We have to defeat radical jihadist terrorism or radical Islamism, whatever you call it" Clinton breaks from Obama, calls Orlando attack 'radical Islamism' - POLITICO

zimmer said:
Since Obama took office those words didn't pass through their lips... And Candy Crowley in a setup wrongly backed Obama claiming so.
Click to expand...
False.
"And it mattered we got bin Laden, not what name we called him. I have clearly said we -- whether you call it radical jihadism or radical Islamism, I'm happy to say either. I think they mean the same thing." Hillary Clinton: I'll say the words 'radical Islamism' - CNNPolitics.com


It's not just an Obama thing, but a Demokrat Party thing.
Click to expand...
You spelt it wrong.

And this is also false.
"Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said Wednesday he had no issue using the term "radical Islam" a day after President Obama defended his refusal to use the phrase.
"[H]e should have said radical Islam — I would say that. I believe that they're radical, very radical," http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...hin-on-radical-islam-id-say-it-in-a-heartbeat

"Look, this is something that I have disagreed with the president on because I think it's important that you identify your enemy, you know who they are, you call them by their name, and you understand the ideology that's driving them. " Dem Rep. Gabbard: Use Term Radical Islamic Terrorism, "Important That You Identify Your Enemy" | Video | RealClearPolitics

This is not a Democratic Party thing and its really not a Republican party thing (see Bush not labeling "radical Islam" also)



Psssst... Proving my point... Barely 10-months ago...
Hillary Clinton explains why she won't say 'radical Islam' - CNNPolitics.com
Click to expand...
Pssst.... Barely 2 months ago Hillary Clinton: I'll say the words 'radical Islamism' - CNNPolitics.com
 
disneydude said:
What EXACTLY is the "dangerous immigration policies" that you speak of? Not banning all Muslims from coming into the United States? Be specific. thanks
Click to expand...

How about not knowing who you are letting in? I would say that that is dangerous................... Pretty darn simple.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom