• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton to follow Angela Merkel and import millions of Muslim refugees

eohrnberger said:
Agreed. We are witnessing a Christian genocide in the Middle East at the hands of the ISIS Militant Muslim Extremists.

It would seem reasonable that Christians fleeing from Middle East would have a much easier time assimilating into the US culture than Muslims fleeing the Middle East, just based on the values framework of the Christian religion being much the same as the values framework already present here.

Last I read the percentage of Muslims being resettled here in the US is grater than 90%, so if there isn't a written mandate to favor Muslims, it certainly seems they are.
Click to expand...

I agree. It would be easier and more advantageous for the US to take Christian refugees vs. muslims because they would assimilate much faster. Besides, Christianity is 100% compatible with our culture/laws/Constitution than Islam and Sharia.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
The culturally guaranteed moderates are largely Kurds, which are in opposition to our ally, the Turks.
It's not quite that easy to do.

The rest is a mixed bag.
Click to expand...

But now we're talking about international relations. None of those complexities prevent us from extending aid to refugees, regardless of ethnicity or faith.
 
GhostlyJoe said:
But now we're talking about international relations. None of those complexities prevent us from extending aid to refugees, regardless of ethnicity or faith.
Click to expand...

Honestly, you may not believe it, but I'm fairly sure that the reason we're importing Muslims, rather than the groups in serious need is because of politics.
It's the same reason illegal immigration hasn't been dealt with.

Dems want more voters, they're importing them.
It's shown, more or less, with Hispanics in DNCLeaks, likely the same reason for importing Muslims.
They're using demographic changes to create a long term wedge in politics, to make the GOP a minority party.

That's my opinion.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
Honestly, you may not believe it, but I'm fairly sure that the reason we're importing Muslims, rather than the groups in serious need is because of politics.
It's the same reason illegal immigration hasn't been dealt with.

Dems want more voters, they're importing them.
It's shown, more or less, with Hispanics in DNCLeaks, likely the same reason for importing Muslims.
They're using demographic changes to create a long term wedge in politics, to make the GOP a minority party.

That's my opinion.
Click to expand...

Politicians pander. I certainly believe that. Doesn't change what I think is right and which policies I favor.

Long-term demographic predictions seem to favor the Democratic party as it currently exists. But it's also sort of the nature of conservative parties to swim against the tide.
 
GhostlyJoe said:
Politicians pander. I certainly believe that. Doesn't change what I think is right and which policies I favor.

Long-term demographic predictions seem to favor the Democratic party as it currently exists. But it's also sort of the nature of conservative parties to swim against the tide.
Click to expand...

I'm saying the demographic shifts aren't by happenstance, their purposeful.
Bringing in a new demographic, solely to maintain or gain political power, is immoral and unethical, even if the stated reason is moral.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
I'm saying the demographic shifts aren't by happenstance, their purposeful.
Bringing in a new demographic, solely to maintain or gain political power, is immoral and unethical, even if the stated reason is moral.
Click to expand...

I don't doubt the DNC favors minority immigration, but they don't have that much control over it. Only citizens vote, so bringing in refugees doesn't equate to a changing electorate, especially not in the short term.
 
GhostlyJoe said:
I don't doubt the DNC favors minority immigration, but they don't have that much control over it. Only citizens vote, so bringing in refugees doesn't equate to a changing electorate, especially not in the short term.
Click to expand...

They are the current government.
Refugees become citizens.

I don't trust political parties when it comes to this.
If we really cared about groups in danger, we'd be bringing in the most in danger first.
Not the most politically profitable.

I'm fine with helping.
We just need to help the right ones first and foremost/
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
They are the current government.
Refugees become citizens.

I don't trust political parties when it comes to this.
If we really cared about groups in danger, we'd be bringing in the most in danger first.
Not the most politically profitable.

I'm fine with helping.
We just need to help the right ones first and foremost/
Click to expand...

The best way to help them is send them arms so they can fright for their country back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom