• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Former Clinton email tech aide won’t testify

This morning he was supposed to appear. He didn't. Now he is in contempt of Congress.

Not a good position for him to be.

If he appeared and pled the 5th, that would have been a different story, but I guess he didn't feel he had to.
I was just going off the OP where his lawyers said he would invoke his 5th amendment right if called to testify.

All of this is just a cat and mouse game. Clinton knows that anyone in a position to give damaging testimony will plead the 5th and when they do she then turns around and toots the horn of... "See! They keep dragging up these politically motivated false claims despite the fact that there is no evidence." "It's a partisan witch hunt!"(ironic because I truly believe she IS a witch or at least was in a past life)

Until someone dares to testify against her, she's in the clear and she knows it.
 
Sounds like the smart play in the face of a Grandstanding GOP

Lol.....yes, the smart play is to legitimize this " witch hunt " by pleading the 5th
 
Pagliano wasn't granted immunity.....Paul Combetta, was.

"Obstruction of justice"...what a laugh. Obstruction of Chaffetz's political agenda is more like it.

Mr. Combetta is one of at least two people who were given immunity by the Justice Department as part of the investigation. The other was Bryan Pagliano, a former campaign staff member for Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, who was granted immunity in exchange for answering questions about how he set up a server in Mrs. Clinton’s home in Chappaqua, N.Y., around the time she became secretary of state in 2009.

Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails - NYTimes.com

.....
 
Lol.....yes, the smart play is to legitimize this " witch hunt " by pleading the 5th

Exactly! Legitimize, "grand standing", by admitting he broke the law...lol
 
Oh please...you were the one that called them cowards. That kind of hyperbole is not intelligent discussion. :roll:


Does continuing this political farce with more subpoenas have any legislative purpose what so ever? We have a justice system and an investigative agency...so why is congress acting as both instead of doing their job legislating?


It's a farce to you because you tow the democrat party line at all costs.
 
It's a farce to you because you tow the democrat party line at all costs.

Says the guy that tows the republican party line... hook, line and stinker.
 
Says the guy that tows the republican party line... hook, line and stinker.

I am not a republican, I have told you that some time back in multiple posts, and as far as I am concerned both parties can go to hell.
 
If he has immunity...why should he appear before congress if he's just going to claim the fifth...for the 125th time?

To give the illusion that Hillary did nothing wrong.
 
If he has immunity...why should he appear before congress if he's just going to claim the fifth...for the 125th time?

The 5th will only cover his azz for so long. As soon as they have a shred of proof in his involvement, he will face the music no matter what he refuses to say.
 
I am not a republican, I have told you that some time back in multiple posts, and as far as I am concerned both parties can go to hell.

I could give a rats ass what you call yourself. I go by your opinions and they reek of GOP talking points through and through.
 
If he has immunity...why should he appear before congress if he's just going to claim the fifth...for the 125th time?

You'll have to ask him why he's obstructing justice.

If this is a dog and pony show, as you claim, he wouldn't have asked for immunity and wouldn't be invoking his 5th Amendment rights.
 
I am not a republican, I have told you that some time back in multiple posts, and as far as I am concerned both parties can go to hell.

That I agree with. Both parties need to be thrown out the window into the cesspool of horse manure where they belong for making us have to choose between Clinton and Trump. The two major parties are obsolete and belong on the scrap heap of history. Both told the American people to stick it where the sun doesn't shine with their choice of nominees.

I for one am not buying into it, I will be voting for Gary Johnson and every third party candidate on the ballot. It is the political parties, Republican and Democratic that has wrought all our problems as a nation today. I agree, to hell with both.
 
I could give a rats ass what you call yourself. I go by your opinions and they reek of GOP talking points through and through.

I have shredded the GOP and their politics on here many many times. The problem is, that you closed mindedly reference any rebuttal as a attack from the far right.
 
The 5th will only cover his azz for so long. As soon as they have a shred of proof in his involvement, he will face the music no matter what he refuses to say.

It's not a secret that Pagliano was hired by Clinton to set up and maintain her server. His involvement was spelled out in the FBI report. Congress isn't going to find out anymore than what the FBI found so it's all just an exercise in futility for the sake of a political agenda to keep this email nonsense alive until the election.
 
It's not a secret that Pagliano was hired by Clinton to set up and maintain her server. His involvement was spelled out in the FBI report. Congress isn't going to find out anymore than what the FBI found so it's all just an exercise in futility for the sake of a political agenda to keep this email nonsense alive until the election.

Time will tell.
 
He's not testifying because Obama has rigged the whole thing. Simple as that.
 
I have shredded the GOP and their politics on here many many times. The problem is, that you closed mindedly reference any rebuttal as a attack from the far right.

Oh yeah...then post a link to one.
 
Sound like to me they and Hillary have something to hide.

That's probably because they don't. You (we) know more about Hillary than any other candidate or politician that ever ran for office.
 
You'll have to ask him why he's obstructing justice.

If this is a dog and pony show, as you claim, he wouldn't have asked for immunity and wouldn't be invoking his 5th Amendment rights.

Congress isn't interested in justice...they're only interested in bringing Clinton's ratings down and abusing their power to do it.
 
Back
Top Bottom