• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pneumonia? Hillary received neurological test before she collapsed

Despite her campaign claiming it was pneumonia that led to her ill health in New York on Sunday, Hillary Clinton was caught on camera receiving a neurological test from someone who appeared to be a nurse.
The image shows Hillary grasping the woman’s fingers with her fist, which is a classic motor neuron test to determine abnormalities in the nervous system.
Pneumonia? Hillary Received Neurological Test Before She Collapsed » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

It doesn't look like a neurological exam from the picture. It's not clear what the young lady is doing.
 
Like "news" about the Illuminati and the NWO?
Of course the MSM won't mention that nonsense, because that's what is: nonsense.

I don't buy into any "propaganda machine". But I definitely don't buy into conspiratorial BS that Infowars and Prison Planet presents.

That's a terrible comparison.

There is in fact a liberal globalist agenda, info wars may embellish it or use hyperbole, there may not be an actual NWO or Illuminati, but the MSM won't even address it. So which one is less credible? As a liberal that would be the one that disagrees with your world view I guess. To me they are both as credible or non-credible as the other. The Islamic Terrorism comparison is dead on. Info Wars would have you believe Islamic jihad is lurking at every mosque while the MSM won't even mention it. Neither narrative is credible, the reality is that not all Muslims are terrorist but Islam (A subset of the Muslim faith) is the religion of terror. All Muslims do not believe in the ideology of Islam, but all Islamic followers come from the Muslim faith. If you don't understand that then you should do your research.
 
I'd say they are not. If you believe all the garbage from the MSM, you have blinders on and are deceived...DAILY!

Didn't say I believed everything that the MSM pushes.

And honestly, if anyone's being deceived, it's you.

And many times have very plausible and good coverage.

Of course you think that.
 
Because they peddle nonsensical conspiracy theories, and all other sorts of ridiculous BS.

CTs do serve a purpose, though. While they are off in left field, in many cases, they question things that normally would not get questioned. Don't forget, The National Enquirer broke the Edwards cheating scandal.
 
CTs do serve a purpose, though. While they are off in left field, in many cases, they question things that normally would not get questioned.

But to what end? Has this ever proved useful?
 
But to what end? Has this ever proved useful?

Well, to some degree. Our government seems to inherently prefer to be secretive so CTs can serve the purpose of digging into things and sometimes exposing abuses or lies. I don't mind people digging around. I look at it more as the scientific method. True science is to be a skeptic.
 
WikiLeaks gave us a lot that proved to be useful, even though I know you don't care that Hillary is a crook.

Wikileaks is not a Conspiracy Theory site.

Fishking said:
Well, to some degree. Our government seems to inherently prefer to be secretive so CTs can serve the purpose of digging into things and sometimes exposing abuses or lies.

But has this really happened before at all? and if so, has it happened enough times for it to be worthwhile? I'm not saying it hasn't, I just really can't think of any time when it has.
 
Wikileaks is not a Conspiracy Theory site.

But has this really happened before at all? and if so, has it happened enough times for it to be worthwhile? I'm not saying it hasn't, I just really can't think of any time when it has.

Wikileaks is not a conspiracy site but it does provide real documentation to back up what would only be speculation off of observation. For example, I read all kinds of issues from Bernie supporters regarding the validity of the primary elections and possible voter fraud. Wikileaks provided evidence that gave a little more weight to those theories.
 
Back
Top Bottom