WSJ publishes clips from Trumps radio show from 2006-2008.

roughdraft274 said:

No. No their isn't.

Click to expand...

Sure there is. Remember the "Affluenza Teen", who killed 4 people, and left others crippled for life, because he was driving drunk and didn't give an F? He was sentenced to probation because his family is rich and connected. Untouchable.

Perotista said:

Not to mention political parties. Democrat three times, Republican three times, Independent three times and then to ruin the threes, he belonged to my tiny Reform Party only once and then for only about a year.

Trump is an opportunist, an egotist and much more. His lifelong held political views were very liberal. He change a couple and promised to build a wall and viola, this liberal won the Republican nomination. It his persona, his fighting spirit, his political incorrectness that endeared this liberal to the GOP.

Lets face it, we have a true blood Democrat running, perhaps more center left that far left and a liberal Democrat wearing Republican clothing or sheep's wool. Heck, the Dems can't lose regardless of who wins.

Click to expand...

He is one of many bluedog democrats that got pushed out of the democratic party and made his way over to the gop. Washington is full of them.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

trouble13 said:

He is one of many bluedog democrats that got pushed out of the democratic party and made his way over to the gop. Washington is full of them.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

Makes sense to me. As both political move more and more to the extreme right and left, they leave more and more Americans behind or without a home, a political party to belong to. I do know the Democratic Party kicked out those old yeller dog Democrats a long time ago.

truthatallcost said:

Sure there is. Remember the "Affluenza Teen", who killed 4 people, and left others crippled for life, because he was driving drunk and didn't give an F? He was sentenced to probation because his family is rich and connected. Untouchable.

Click to expand...

One example of a person getting a ridiculously laxed punishment doesn't make untouchable people exist.

truthatallcost said:

Did Trump say that Hillary would make a good president when Hillary was begging him for campaign donations? That would be relevant to his comment and why he said it. Being that Hillary was a NY senator, Trump would be shooting himself in the foot to say how he really felt about her at the time.

Click to expand...

So you're saying that Trump is a serial liar? He publicly will say whatever benefits him at the time? You endorse that behavior?

roughdraft274 said:

One example of a person getting a ridiculously laxed punishment doesn't make untouchable people exist.

Click to expand...

Look, you really have no argument here. Our justice system has been unfair for years. A black guy that was convicted of selling $20 worth of drugs in Los Angeles was sentenced to life in prison. Hillary Clinton has committed far worse crimes and always gone free.

You are really going to sound ridiculous here if your only point is "untouchable not really a thing"

truthatallcost said:

Look, you really have no argument here. Our justice system has been unfair for years. A black guy that was convicted of selling $20 worth of drugs in Los Angeles was sentenced to life in prison. Hillary Clinton has committed far worse crimes and always gone free.

You are really going to sound ridiculous here if your only point is "untouchable not really a thing"

Click to expand...

Our justice system is unfair in many aspects. That doesn't mean that we untouchables. These aren't the same thing.

Zyphlin said:

So instead of "Trump is a flip flopper on these issues" we instead have a "Trump will say anything he needs, regardless of whether he actually believes it, if it benefits him".

Truly, a sterling argument as to why we should totally trust that Trump's current stances as the Republican nominee are sincere and legitimate and aren't being said simply because it benefits him :roll:

Click to expand...

I see what you're saying.

Do I think that Trump is a perfect candidate? No.
Do I think that Trump would make a better president than Hillary? Absolutely.

What other options exist? Gary Johnson is polling at 7% currently. Johnson has no chance whatsoever of beating Hillary and her dregs.

roughdraft274 said:

Our justice system is unfair in many aspects. That doesn't mean that we untouchables. These aren't the same thing.

Click to expand...

What is an untouchable? It's someone who is financially able to afford the best legal council, and socially or politically connected to powerful people who have the ability to secure a favorable outcome, such as a light sentence (Affluenza Teen case), or no punishment whatsoever (Hillary Clinton).

Meanwhile, the black guy I mentioned, sold 20 bucks worth of crack to an undercover officer, had no money to hire attorneys, had no friends in high places, and was sentenced to life in prison, under the 3 strikes law.

truthatallcost said:

What is an untouchable? It's someone who is financially able to afford the best legal council, and socially or politically connected to powerful people who have the ability to secure a favorable outcome, such as a light sentence (Affluenza Teen case), or no punishment whatsoever (Hillary Clinton).

Click to expand...

Hillary isn't untouchable. You're just upset that made up scandals haven't brought her down to her knees.

roughdraft274 said:

Hillary isn't untouchable. You're just upset that made up scandals haven't brought her down to her knees.

Click to expand...

No, I'm upset that Hillary gets away with serious felonies while men and women sit in prison for things like selling $20 worth of drugs for personal use.

If you were really progressive, you'd feel the same way, but you sound like another Hillary Zombie who knows nothing about her, but thinks she's an amazing woman who is fit for the presidency.

truthatallcost said:

No, I'm upset that Hillary gets away with serious felonies

Click to expand...

Serious felonies such as?

roughdraft274 said:

Serious felonies such as?

Click to expand...

"Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information", 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment. Secretary Clinton was trained in handling of classified materials, and acknowledges that she understood them. By transmitting and receiving email correspondence that contained information gleaned from foreign government sources on an unauthorized, insecure system, she violated the law.

How about that? Ten years in prison. Hillary can start her sentence now, and be out in time to run for president in 2028.

truthatallcost said:

"Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information", 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment. Secretary Clinton was trained in handling of classified materials, and acknowledges that she understood them. By transmitting and receiving email correspondence that contained information gleaned from foreign government sources on an unauthorized, insecure system, she violated the law.

How about that? Ten years in prison. Hillary can start her sentence now, and be out in time to run for president in 2028.

Click to expand...

The FBI said it never charged anyone in circumstances similar to Hillary's, that there were always aggravating factors when they pursued charges. Either prove they were lying or stop trying to play lawyer.

Further, the last five SoS's engaged in similar behaviors with allegedly classified material though not using a private email server without being charged or indeed, anyone who is mad at Hillary saying a damned thing.

What she did may have been stupid and careless, just like other SoS's, but that doesn't make it criminal. Copy/pasting part of a subsection of a statute doesn't change that.





Basically, the people investigating the law say you are wrong AND you are demanding that we abandon the principle of treating like cases alike so as to attack your perceived political enemy. But the right just doesn't care anymore. All that matters is that their enemies be attacked. Hence, for example, they cheer on the evil murdering dictator Duerte when he insults the United States President, simply because Obama is their perceived political enemy.

No shame. No honesty. No basic decency.





That's bad.

truthatallcost said:

"Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information", 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment. Secretary Clinton was trained in handling of classified materials, and acknowledges that she understood them. By transmitting and receiving email correspondence that contained information gleaned from foreign government sources on an unauthorized, insecure system, she violated the law.

How about that? Ten years in prison. Hillary can start her sentence now, and be out in time to run for president in 2028.

Click to expand...

And a top republican official examined this and determined that she shouldn't be prosecuted and that no one has ever been prosecuted for what she did. Anything that was classified (but of course unmarked) and was sent to hillary was also sent to hundreds of other officials on their emails that's not to be used for classified info. None of them were prosecuted either correct? Can you point to anyone that has ever been prosecuted on this where there wasn't a malicious intent behind their actions?

roughdraft274 said:

And a top republican official examined this and determined that she shouldn't be prosecuted and that no one has ever been prosecuted for what she did. Anything that was classified (but of course unmarked) and was sent to hillary was also sent to hundreds of other officials on their emails that's not to be used for classified info. None of them were prosecuted either correct? Can you point to anyone that has ever been prosecuted on this where there wasn't a malicious intent behind their actions?

Click to expand...

What's the penalty for getting caught with 700 FBI files that were ordered to spy on Hillary's enemies? Oh yes, for someone who is untouchable, that penalty would be: nothing.

Craig Livingstone, the man who Hillary hired to obtain 700 files took the fall for Hillary, and take it he did.

A common theme with the Clintons is where they let their friends and staff workers take the rap, while they get off scot free.

Webb Hubbell (who Clinton once wanted to nominate for Attorney General) took the fall and went to prison, Sandy Berger took the fall for Bill Clinton's blunders surrounding 9/11, Craig Livingstone took the fall for Filegate.

Being in the Clinton's gang of shady schemers can be very bad for one's career.