• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do we need the Bureau of Alcohol Tabaco and Firearms?

PoS said:
Why stop here? We should also get rid of FDA, DEA, EPA, HS and the Fed Reserve.
Click to expand...

Some would say the USA would be better off without them. The more ignorant and hedonistic the society, the more you need a nanny state. Unfortunately, our society has devolved to the point it needs the latter.
 
NoLeftNoRight said:
Some would say the USA would be better off without them. The more ignorant and hedonistic the society, the more you need a nanny state. Unfortunately, our society has devolved to the point it needs the latter.
Click to expand...

Show me any society on earth with no crime,and no law enforcement agencies. Nanny state WTF is that universal daycare?
 
Green Hornet said:
Non of your tax money goes to the Clinton foundation.
Click to expand...

None?
Uh, I'll need copies of all your research documentation to convince me of that.

That's pretty much an impossible statement to prove.....or disprove.
 
Green Hornet said:
Show me any society on earth with no crime,and no law enforcement agencies. Nanny state WTF is that universal daycare?
Click to expand...
Who said anything about no law enforcement agencies?

You are aware that the main intent of the US Constitution is to LIMIT the power of the federal government right?

The states are quite capable of enforcing law and growing crops etc.
 
NoLeftNoRight said:
None?
Uh, I'll need copies of all your research documentation to convince me of that.

That's pretty much an impossible statement to prove.....or disprove.
Click to expand...

Prove that I am wrong, the burden is on on you for proof not me. Show me where tax money went to the Clinton Foundation. And if such proof actually exists report it. Where do some of you posters get this proof B.S at? This is not court.
 
NoLeftNoRight said:
Who said anything about no law enforcement agencies?

You are aware that the main intent of the US Constitution is to LIMIT the power of the federal government right?

The states are quite capable of enforcing law and growing crops etc.
Click to expand...

No it is not, I am sure you believe that but it is not true. Are saying the ATF is Un - Constitutional?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom