• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World Ten Trends

While both points are loony, it's the part about human interaction becoming less necessary that's bat**** insane - people need human interaction to be healthy, and very few people are terrified of other humans enough that they would be willing to walk around in a giant combat suit, assuming such a device were ever available to civilians. I for one would never put something so ludicrously impractical on, and I'm 5'11" and 145 lbs. And even if I did somehow come to the conclusion that I need to strap on some kind of military-grade combat suit to interact with other people, my thin frame would greatly limit my carrying capacity compared to, say, a three-hundred pound bodybuilder, who would be capable of hefting around far, far more gear than I could, thus shifting the balance of power squarely into the big guy's corner.


Protective suits will become more and more powerful, lighter and lighter, cheaper and cheaper with progress of science and technologies, which is similar to the development histories of personal computers and mobile phones.
 
No. You are wrong.

The Sun is hot because it is desroying mass. Not giving it away but actually destroying it. Changing mass into energy.

mass and energy of the sun reduce at the same time by radiating photons and other particles to planets and other stars.
 
Yep, that was one of the things they got wrong. Matter and energy are sort of the same, in that mass is a form of potential energy, but the implications of Einstein's stuff has taken a long time to filter down to us idiots. I hope the process of this education has speeded up with the internet and all but who knows?

if mass and energy are not same, what relationship or equation between mass and energy do you think?
 
if mass and energy are not same, what relationship or equation between mass and energy do you think?

Mass and energy are not the same thing but they can be considered manifistations of the same base stuff. I wish I could say it better.

That is when we say E=MC*2 it means that when mass is converted to a different form of energy it will be a lot, as the mass is multipied by the speed of light squared. However, since I am but a plumber this is all a lot beyond me.

When the sun converts mass to energy it destroys the mass in the process. There is less mass in the universe due to the sun destroying 2 million tonnes of it a second.
 
If you ascribe to Multiverse Theory, then there is at least one universe in which those insane predictions are actually accurate - not necessarily beneficial to human life, but accurate.

Is that the same one where unicorns poop cancer curing drugs and the speed of light is 45 MPH??
 
The sun surely has been losing mass but Jupiter or Saturn or other planet will likely increase mass and replace the sun. Even if Jupiter or Saturn or other planet will also disappear with the sun, the mass of some stars outside the sun system will get the mass from the sun system.
The start point of Big Bang theory is completely an imagination that has not been proved just like my imaginations.
All of the space telescopes of humans can not see the whole universe. "the universe is slowly expanding from a start point" is likely just local phenomenon of the whole universe.

But if other stars are picking up mass from our sun, then our sun should also be picking up mass from them. Oops... I used logic there. Sorry about that....
 
The much feared Wall O' Text has returned.

When I first read that, I thought it said "Wall of Texas". Maybe we should have neverearth build The Wall using his theories explained in detail. By the time any illegal immigrants got done reading them, they would have laughed themselves into a coma...
 
Protective suits will become more and more powerful, lighter and lighter, cheaper and cheaper with progress of science and technologies, which is similar to the development histories of personal computers and mobile phones.

...You really don't understand the concept of carrying capacity, do you?
 
...... my thin frame would greatly limit my carrying capacity compared to, say, a three-hundred pound bodybuilder, who would be capable of hefting around far, far more gear than I could, thus shifting the balance of power squarely into the big guy's corner.


You won't need heft any heavy gear except your light weapons. Your protective suits can prevent you from big guy's attack and your weapons can beat back. Victory or defeat of personal attack and defense will depend not on bones and muscles but on technical contents of protective suits and weapons.
 
But if other stars are picking up mass from our sun, then our sun should also be picking up mass from them. Oops... I used logic there. Sorry about that....

Everything is getting mass from others and is losing mass to others at the same time. I just said the net change of mass.
 
So why is ours losing while other are gaining?? Is our sun suffering under a gypsy curse??

That was surely a possible but not certain case.
case 1 is: most of mass of sun will be gained by Jupiter or Saturn or other planet in the sun system.
case 2 is: most of mass of sun will be gained by the stars outside the sun system.
 
I suspect he joined the forum to feel out his dissertation :shrug:

I joined the forum because I am not sure that my predictions, particularly the part about simplifying English will be true. So I want to discuss them with you all.
 
That was surely a possible but not certain case.
case 1 is: most of mass of sun will be gained by Jupiter or Saturn or other planet in the sun system.
case 2 is: most of mass of sun will be gained by the stars outside the sun system.

But what about the gypsy curse??? It is not the primary cause of all this?? Shouldn't we be seeking a wayto break that curse and return our solar system to a state of planetary equilibrium???
 
But what about the gypsy curse??? It is not the primary cause of all this?? Shouldn't we be seeking a wayto break that curse and return our solar system to a state of planetary equilibrium???

If humans can't live on the earth, humans will perhaps move to other planet in the sun system. But if humans can't live on any planet in the sun system, human in the sun system will likely disappear because it is nearly impossible for humans to move to other star system. All of lives including humans have limited life period.
 
The only thing that I agree with you is only point 3, where maybe in the future there is only molecular food. Right now people dont have time for eat food but they still want to ensure their body healty and the only way to do that is creating some molecular food, its greatly effective.

Point number 2, it may happens it may doesn't happen. As the time goes on people will slowly dont believe about the existence of God and im sure someday some people will spread stupid precept that the world it self is a God.But im telling you all right now that the world is not God.God is the one who gives us the true affection, the one who teachs us about true affection and no other things in this universe can do that.
 
The only thing that I agree with you is only point 3, where maybe in the future there is only molecular food. Right now people dont have time for eat food but they still want to ensure their body healty and the only way to do that is creating some molecular food, its greatly effective.

Point number 2, it may happens it may doesn't happen. As the time goes on people will slowly dont believe about the existence of God and im sure someday some people will spread stupid precept that the world it self is a God.But im telling you all right now that the world is not God.God is the one who gives us the true affection, the one who teachs us about true affection and no other things in this universe can do that.


Why don't you think point 8 about simplifying English will be possible? Don't you think English is too complicated? Don't you think all of letters and all of phonetic symbols should be unified? Don't you think English words such as verbs have too many unnecessary transformations?
 
Back
Top Bottom