• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Petition with Over 35,000 signatures to remove ALL air Con from State Dept .[W:52]

Re: Petition with Over 35,000 signatures to remove ALL air Con from State Dept .[W:52

trouble13 said:
Personaly what i would of liked to hear after iran announced its intentions was for america to announce its intention to exit the nonproliferation treaty.

We entered that treaty for the purposes of disarming current stockpiles and preventing future production of new ones. That only works if the world is united on this. If the world is going to tolerate places like Iran and N. Korea developing nuclear arms. America should ratchet up its program and we can see who casts the longest shadow of nuclear terror.

America should give the world a clear choice either everyone is going to work toward disarment or everyone can try to keep up to our pace.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what that would accomplish. We already have enough nukes to wipe out the human race and probably most other species.
 
Re: Petition with Over 35,000 signatures to remove ALL air Con from State Dept .[W:52

Mr Person said:
I'm not sure what that would accomplish. We already have enough nukes to wipe out the human race and probably most other species.
Click to expand...
I dont think it would actually result in us making more nukes. I think the threat of the intention to would put enough pressure on the rest of the world that they would become more enfaged in preventing other nations from going nuclear and it would squash any intentions they had for expanding their own program. The world needs yo make a choice whether it wants more nukes or less of them. America declaring it intends to start producing more of them if others are insisting on making them pressures the world to stop.

I mentioned it because i am partly conservative and you indicated that you had not heard any ideas from conservatives on how to stop them without attacking them. Im offering you this as one possible way of doing it.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Re: Petition with Over 35,000 signatures to remove ALL air Con from State Dept .[W:52

trouble13 said:
I dont think it would actually result in us making more nukes. I think the threat of the intention to would put enough pressure on the rest of the world that they would become more enfaged in preventing other nations from going nuclear and it would squash any intentions they had for expanding their own program. The world needs yo make a choice whether it wants more nukes or less of them. America declaring it intends to start producing more of them if others are insisting on making them pressures the world to stop.

I mentioned it because i am partly conservative and you indicated that you had not heard any ideas from conservatives on how to stop them without attacking them. Im offering you this as one possible way of doing it.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Hmmm. I just don't see a declaration that we're ramping up our nuclear program as having any purpose, let alone effect on Iran unless it is to encourage them to try to build their own even faster. I certainly don't think it would be a likely response for them to say "ok ok, we'll stop now".

Unless we team up with Israel and seriously go after them, I think the only thing that could have been done was to kick the can down the road, which is exactly what the deal does.
 
Re: Petition with Over 35,000 signatures to remove ALL air Con from State Dept .[W:52

Mr Person said:
Hmmm. I just don't see a declaration that we're ramping up our nuclear program as having any purpose, let alone effect on Iran unless it is to encourage them to try to build their own even faster. I certainly don't think it would be a likely response for them to say "ok ok, we'll stop now".

Unless we team up with Israel and seriously go after them, I think the only thing that could have been done was to kick the can down the road, which is exactly what the deal does.
Click to expand...
To be clear this is only my opinion.

I agree it might not deter irans efforts but it would motivate the rest of the world to deter irans efforts for them. I dont think anyone wants to get into an arms tace with us.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom