• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary's Speech

So much for change, right?

This last week O'Rielly interviewed some Dem Congressman. In the Congressman's rant, he mention that Hilary's immigration proposals would include securing the border.
So OR ask, how would the border be secured? The Congressman danced around the issue four times and never answered how. The responses were well it will start with making it legal for those who are hear to stay, allow more migrant workers to come in, keep families together, and make it easier for those who want to come in to do so. Not much for securing the border.
Typical for a politician.

I don't like Trump, I don't like Hillary. No matter who gets elected, I believe the country will be grid locked between Congress and the President. In fighting will continue and the US will slump.

Trump, to me, is the lesser of evils...but to a lot of people he is NOT a politician. His campaign rhetoric supports that because he says what he WILL do instead of being wishy-washy about it like Hillary. I think that's one of the reasons he has so much support.
 
you mean you goofed and you aren't willing to concede what is a major error? the fact is-a guy OBAMA picked to run the FBI has found that HILLARY IS A LIAR


actually I did point out my error, you are making a fool of yourself again.
 
Don't post stupid lies and then call someone else's post "foolishness". The foolishness was your post. And no, I don't read all of the posts in the thread before responding as I'm reading along. When I join a board that you are in charge of, you can make the rules of reading and responding, and I'll do it.

But I see Turtle caught your ignorant mistake anyway. No wonder your posts are so snivelly. Two smart people showed everyone your foolishness.


and you keep driving it into the ground. your emotional issues laid bare.
 
She absolutely was cleared.

No she was not. Comey said he found credible evidence of potential wrongdoing but chose not to prosecute. He exposed countless lies on her part and described her activity as 'extreme carelessness.' I get that you are just a leftist partisan and none of that bothers you since she is a liberal, but that is not being cleared
 
Good lord...do you people even read what you are responding to?

I didn't say a word about Hillary...just like I wasn't defending Trump.

I was talking about Obama!!

I know it wasn't about Hillary
Just like you know Obama and Bush have said the same line before

Go hack elsewhere
 
Trump, to me, is the lesser of evils...but to a lot of people he is NOT a politician. His campaign rhetoric supports that because he says what he WILL do instead of being wishy-washy about it like Hillary. I think that's one of the reasons he has so much support.

It is Britney Spears going up against Kanye West.

I am not ready to put any money down.

I am hoping Yeezus prevails.

:popcorn2:
 
I know it wasn't about Hillary
Just like you know Obama and Bush have said the same line before

Go hack elsewhere

Unbunch your panties, dude...and get relevant.

Or get dismissed.

you-are-dismissed-749788.jpg
 
No she was not. Comey said he found credible evidence of potential wrongdoing but chose not to prosecute. He exposed countless lies on her part and described her activity as 'extreme carelessness.' I get that you are just a leftist partisan and none of that bothers you since she is a liberal, but that is not being cleared

No he didn't....where are you getting this stuff. He said that he found evidence of clear negligence but nothing that rose to the level of illegality, thus no prosecution. It wasn't that "he chose not to prosecute". He clearly said that there was nothing TO prosecute. Doh!
 
I didn't watch one second of the conventions. They have nothing to do with reality. And I can't listen to Clinton at all. I'd rather be subject to than medieval torture or Winston Smith's rats than listen to her for one second.
 
I didn't watch one second of the conventions. They have nothing to do with reality. And I can't listen to Clinton at all. I'd rather be subject to than medieval torture or Winston Smith's rats than listen to her for one second.

Kinda like fingernails on a chalkboard, huh?
 
Back
Top Bottom