• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Juanita broaddrick: He raped me twice

VanceMack said:
Its not 'just' relevant because you are contemplating returning a rapist to the White House. Its not 'just the rape of Juanita Broderick and the sexual assault of Kathleen Wiley and others. Its not 'just' that he lied about it under oath, suborned perjury, had multiple affairs, etc. That all speaks to Bill. But when Hillary has spent her husbands entire career not just covering for him but also attacking his victims...well...trying to sell her as a champion of women will be rather suspect. Thats why it matters today (in addition to finally letting some of those people heal.
Click to expand...

I think Bill is a nasty man. He has no class, something which I spotted as soon as I saw him for the first time 30 years ago. He's white trash. He is a sleaze. I don't know if he raped Broderick or not - I don't think it was ever proven. I also don'[t understand Hillary's defense of him except I guess she liked being First Lady and knew she'd need him to advance her career. I know she pretends to champion women and that's a joke. But do you think women who were going to support her are going to turn against her because of the accusation of a woman, decades after this was supposed to have happened? They won't. So the Trump people need to find something else. This stuff didn't wreck him 30 years ago, and it won't wreck her today.
 
One thing that always sticks out to me about liberals is that pick jackasses and then raise them on a podium comparable to that of god. Obama and Bill Clinton are both douchebags and you could tell they were douchebags the first time you ever saw them, and yet, liberals praised Bill at every turn during his presidency and they praise Obama at every turn today. I would love to understand what they see in these two men because all I see is douchebags.
 
tres borrachos said:
Donald Trump is running for the Presidency. Bill Clinton isn't. Donald Trump has no record to scrutinize. His resume is thinner than Barack Obama's. He is running on his "business experience". His "business experience" includes 4 bankruptcies.
Click to expand...

Actually Chapter 11 Reorganizations

And over 500 successes.
 
tres borrachos said:
I think Bill is a nasty man. He has no class, something which I spotted as soon as I saw him for the first time 30 years ago. He's white trash. He is a sleaze. I don't know if he raped Broderick or not - I don't think it was ever proven. I also don'[t understand Hillary's defense of him except I guess she liked being First Lady and knew she'd need him to advance her career. I know she pretends to champion women and that's a joke. But do you think women who were going to support her are going to turn against her because of the accusation of a woman, decades after this was supposed to have happened? They won't. So the Trump people need to find something else. This stuff didn't wreck him 30 years ago, and it won't wreck her today.
Click to expand...
Do you think Juanita Broderick is being forced or coerced? If anything, Bills victims are being given a stage and those women are being given an opportunity to speak...to be heard. Do I think it will matter? I dont know Tres. You are a woman voter. I believe I have heard you say you would never vote for trump. Im cool with that...I wont be voting for him either. But if not Trump would you vote for Hillary? Would you vote for a woman that has been proven to be a liar, has been proven she is untrustworthy and shouldnt be allowed to have access to a security clearance? And...would you vote for a woman you KNOW has spent most of her married life trashing the women her husband has victimized? maybe that would be the final straw for some people. Maybe they wont vote at all. Maybe they will vote 3rd party.

Will it make a difference? I dont know. its really hard to fathom how we got 'here' in the first place. But would you suggest a rape victim should say nothing? Would you say a woman that was pinned in a doorway by Bill Clinton and then groped on the day of her husbands funeral and who was later threatened and silenced by her attackers supporters should just stay silent? ESPECIALLY when the woman running for president has been talking about how much she supports women and that all women victims should be believed?
 
jimbo said:
Actually Chapter 11 Reorganizations

And over 500 successes.
Click to expand...

I know what they were. You asked why people are discussing something that happened 25 years ago. Kind of like Barack Obama's college records that the right was so anxious to see. Those were 30 years old, and Obama wasn't running based on his college record. Trump is running on his business record. He put it out there as his credential. Now it's being scrutinized.
 
VanceMack said:
Do you think Juanita Broderick is being forced or coerced? If anything, Bills victims are being given a stage and those women are being given an opportunity to speak...to be heard. Do I think it will matter? I dont know Tres. You are a woman voter. I believe I have heard you say you would never vote for trump. Im cool with that...I wont be voting for him either. But if not Trump would you vote for Hillary? Would you vote for a woman that has been proven to be a liar, has been proven she is untrustworthy and shouldnt be allowed to have access to a security clearance? And...would you vote for a woman you KNOW has spent most of her married life trashing the women her husband has victimized? maybe that would be the final straw for some people. Maybe they wont vote at all. Maybe they will vote 3rd party.

Will it make a difference? I dont know. its really hard to fathom how we got 'here' in the first place. But would you suggest a rape victim should say nothing? Would you say a woman that was pinned in a doorway by Bill Clinton and then groped on the day of her husbands funeral and who was later threatened and silenced by her attackers supporters should just stay silent? ESPECIALLY when the woman running for president has been talking about how much she supports women and that all women victims should be believed?
Click to expand...

Me? I'm voting for Johnson. I doubt any woman who votes on the basis of women's rights or whatever that bull**** is has not already decided to vote for Hillary. Because they're stupid. They won't vote for Trump, no matter how many women come out and accuse Bill of malfeasance.

Do I think Broderick is being coerced? No clue. Didn't know it was relevant. But if Trump supporters think this story will have any impact at all, I think they're going to be very disappointed.
 
shrubnose said:
Lots of far-right tabloids would be glad to spread that BS.

:lol:
Click to expand...

How about we just take Hillary's advice on this?

Hillary Clinton: Women Should Be Believed When They Claim Rape; "Have To Increase Prevention" | Video | RealClearPolitics

"Today I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault," Clinton said. "Don't let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed and we're with you."
Click to expand...
 
tres borrachos said:
Yes, Bill Clinton is a proven liar. Yes, he's hornier than a 3-balled tomcat. But seriously, this is the best you people can come up with? I really think at this point nobody gives a **** about all of this anymore. If you want to defeat Hillary, go after her, don't drag up this 25 year old **** on her husband.
Click to expand...

Because her husband raping women is nothing to worry about.
 
I first saw Broadrrick's story on 60 Minutes back in the early 90's. I thought she came across as being very credible. That was about the same time 60 Minutes was telling the story of Mena through the testimony of 2 former Arkansas cops who were quite familiar with the shenanigans going on there.

I've always said that Bill Clinton demonstrated clearly that it is very possible for an unconvicted felon to run the government. :mrgreen:
 
tres borrachos said:
Me? I'm voting for Johnson. I doubt any woman who votes on the basis of women's rights or whatever that bull**** is has not already decided to vote for Hillary. Because they're stupid. They won't vote for Trump, no matter how many women come out and accuse Bill of malfeasance.

Do I think Broderick is being coerced? No clue. Didn't know it was relevant. But if Trump supporters think this story will have any impact at all, I think they're going to be very disappointed.
Click to expand...
Id like to think Broederick supporters are maybe more relevant than Trump supporters in this story.
 
joG said:
She should write a short story.
Click to expand...

It's actually a long story, especially if you include all the victims.

shrubnose said:
Lots of far-right tabloids would be glad to spread that BS.

:lol:
Click to expand...

So Bill Cosby is guilty, but Bill Clinton isn't? Did you actually say that in so many words? :lamo

shrubnose said:
This BS has been spread like a serial for years.If there was any truth to it it would have been a court case years ago.
Click to expand...

Statute of limitations. Most of that has saved Cosby's ass too. Do you always support the criminals....?

Captain Adverse said:
Hmm, isn't that what people said about Bill Cosby? :unsure13:

I didn't approve of the Republican's making such a big deal about the Monica Lewinsky thing at the time, but Bill Clinton did lie...
Click to expand...

Yes he did....and Under Oath ........and to the American people on TV.......and the libtards deny it even now! The guy should be in prison right next to his wife.

Karma is waiting for them and the odds against them are increasing with each passing day.

I wonder what Hillary's medical problems are? The odds really increase when the two of them fly in an airplane together....;):cool:
 
Renae said:
Because her husband raping women is nothing to worry about.
Click to expand...

I have no idea who her husband raped, or if he raped anyone. Which is why I don't think about it. Maybe lots of other people do. But until he gets convicted of rape, we can only wonder. In the meantime, and what was my point in this thread, the likelihood of it making a bit of difference in the fight against her is about as remote as the possibility of me wanting to have a sexy fling with Bernie Sanders.
 
VanceMack said:
Id like to think Broederick supporters are maybe more relevant than Trump supporters in this story.
Click to expand...

Oh. I didn't know she had supporters. Maybe I'm out of the loop on these things. I'm more focused on the election.
 
tres borrachos said:
Oh. I didn't know she had supporters. Maybe I'm out of the loop on these things. I'm more focused on the election.
Click to expand...
Whats to focus on? Trainwreck A is in a statistical dead heat with Trainwreck B. Whoever wins...we still get stuck with the trainwreck.

13882500_1600593363566661_7763199242265313029_n.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom