• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary Cl

Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

Having said that would you like to reply to the subject.........


BTW

I did not "imply" RW..............I out and out called it as it is..........

I have replied. Further effort would be a waste of effort, given your view of my opinion, and my view of yours.

Best for both to move on, don't you think?

P.S. You should work on that habit of making unsubstantiated accusations.

Outside of stimulating additional posts, which may very well be your objective, it does nothing for your credibility.
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

I have replied. Further effort would be a waste of effort, given your view of my opinion, and my view of yours.

Best for both to move on, don't you think?

P.S. You should work on that habit of making unsubstantiated accusations.

Outside of stimulating additional posts, which may very well be your objective, it does nothing for your credibility.

Fishing for the answer he wants to hear and ignoring the answers given is not helping either.
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

I have replied. Further effort would be a waste of effort, given your view of my opinion, and my view of yours.

Best for both to move on, don't you think?

P.S. You should work on that habit of making unsubstantiated accusations.

Outside of stimulating additional posts, which may very well be your objective, it does nothing for your credibility.

Maybe that's the problem................There are no opinions here friend........

It's a matter of history...........

Since yall do not to be into "self-learning........

Let me give you something to read.........for those who still do that is..........

Trump and Christie's 'law and order' should terrify you | Editorial
Trump and Christie's 'law and order' should terrify you | Editorial | NJ.com

Biden laughs at Trump's 'law and order candidate' claim
Biden laughs at Trump's 'law and order candidate' claim - POLITICO

Biden Says 'Institutional Racism' Still Exists in Policing
Biden Says 'Institutional Racism' Still Exists in Policing - ABC News

Donald Trump is plagiarizing Richard Nixon’s presidential campaigns
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/135...arizing-richard-nixons-presidential-campaigns

The 1960s-style dog whistle hidden in Donald Trump’s Dallas statement
Trump calls for ‘law and order’ after Dallas | Fusion

Southern strategy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

Dog-Whistle Politics: It’s a Tradition with the GOP - http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/161448#sthash.NbKsJJjd.dpuf

From Wallace To Trump, The Evolution of “Law And Order”
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/from-wallace-to-trump-the-evolution-of-law-and-order/

Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class
https://www.amazon.com/Dog-Whistle-Politics-Appeals-Reinvented/dp/019022925X
Read reviews
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

What value do your posts add to the forum? You never share anything folks can learn from.............all you seem to know how to do is belittle other posters and say" I won."

Well, of course you see no value in a post that demolishes the very premise of your thread...but that doesn't mean the value isn't there.

Quit crying, imyoda...move on.
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

Fishing for the answer he wants to hear and ignoring the answers given is not helping either.

Even more laughable is the accusation my response to the Nixon claims came from some RW source.

Laughable, because the Nixon association is posted all over LW sites, and the usual liberal/socialist progressive media websites. The always entertaining and utterly repulsive Rachel Maddow also floated the meme.

For example:

Donald Trump: 'I Am The Law And Order Candidate'

By declaring himself the “law and order” candidate, however, Trump has ripped a page from the campaign playbook of Richard Nixon, who successfully ran for the presidency in 1968 as the “law and order” candidate. Trump has also cribbed the Nixonian phrase “silent majority” to describe his supporters ― who, like Nixon’s, are largely white and middle class.​

So the question is, who gets what, from where. The jury is in.
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

Maybe that's the problem................There are no opinions here friend........

It's a matter of history...........

Since yall do not to be into "self-learning........

Let me give you something to read.........for those who still do that is..........

Trump and Christie's 'law and order' should terrify you | Editorial
Trump and Christie's 'law and order' should terrify you | Editorial | NJ.com

Biden laughs at Trump's 'law and order candidate' claim
Biden laughs at Trump's 'law and order candidate' claim - POLITICO

Biden Says 'Institutional Racism' Still Exists in Policing
Biden Says 'Institutional Racism' Still Exists in Policing - ABC News

Donald Trump is plagiarizing Richard Nixon’s presidential campaigns
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/135...arizing-richard-nixons-presidential-campaigns

The 1960s-style dog whistle hidden in Donald Trump’s Dallas statement
Trump calls for ‘law and order’ after Dallas | Fusion

Southern strategy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

Dog-Whistle Politics: It’s a Tradition with the GOP - http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/161448#sthash.NbKsJJjd.dpuf

From Wallace To Trump, The Evolution of “Law And Order”
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/from-wallace-to-trump-the-evolution-of-law-and-order/

Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class
https://www.amazon.com/Dog-Whistle-Politics-Appeals-Reinvented/dp/019022925X
Read reviews

No need to confirm your lack of original thought. But thanks for the effort.

As my post to another indicates, I'm well aware of the knee jerk reaction to Trumps Law and Order statements.

Perhaps it would have been better if he claimed he supported Clinton's "Subterfuge and Duplicitous" approach.

At least he wouldn't have stirred up so much copy by the usual suspects.
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

Well, of course you see no value in a post that demolishes the very premise of your thread...but that doesn't mean the value isn't there.

Quit crying, imyoda...move on.

There you go again.........that's your variation of "I won." again adding nothing of value.......

BTW

I had no "premise"..........(you need to check the definition of the word and how its used)

I stated fact backed up with supporting material...........
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

No need to confirm your lack of original thought. But thanks for the effort.

As my post to another indicates, I'm well aware of the knee jerk reaction to Trumps Law and Order statements.

Perhaps it would have been better if he claimed he supported Clinton's "Subterfuge and Duplicitous" approach.

At least he wouldn't have stirred up so much copy by the usual suspects.


Given all you say.........

You still do not know what you are speaking of.............


BTW

I am getting off the stupidity train.............so yall have each other to play with.................ta ta
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

There you go again.........that's your variation of "I won." again adding nothing of value.......

BTW

I had no "premise"..........(you need to check the definition of the word and how its used)

I stated fact backed up with supporting material...........

I used the word correctly.

prem·ise

NOUN

a previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion

You spouted off with your Nixon drivel and used it to infer that Trump is racist...that was your premise...except I blew it out of the water.

That sucks, I know...but you just need to get over it and move on.
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

Given all you say.........

You still do not know what you are speaking of.............


BTW

I am getting off the stupidity train.............so yall have each other to play with.................ta ta

LOL

I believe it's rather obvious I do know what I am writing about.

None the less....:2wave:
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

Given all you say.........

You still do not know what you are speaking of.............


BTW

I am getting off the stupidity train.............so yall have each other to play with.................ta ta

Buh-bye
 
Re: Donald Trump Labels Himself as 'Law and Order' Candidate, While Attacking Hillary

Before you went flapping your mouth did you bother to learn something the Nixon era...........Southern Strategy.......election of '69 or the "law and order" movement.........

Somehow I believe you have not bothered to check..............

That being said.........


Would it be fair to say you have no idea of what you talk about..........

And an attempt to attach Trumps open declaration into racism with HRC highlights another type of deficit...

again... Looking at how someone said/intended those words over 40 years ago does not equate to how someone said/intended those words today. One must look at the context in which the words were used. You clearly have no interest in being honest about this. You are simply a partisan that wishes to project your hatred onto others.
 
Back
Top Bottom