• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed footbal

Re: Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed foo

If we don-t know where the helmet went, maybe Trump bought it with the charity-s money and the helmet went to the charity.

Did the OP investigate that?
 
Re: Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed foo

Man...if it turns out that this is correct and Donald Trump actually bought a helmet from a charity (and paid $12,000.00 to the Susan Khomen foundation IN CHARITY for a helmet) taht could be a HUGE friggen scandal! If the OP and Washington Post are ****ting themselves over this I can only IMAGINE how much they are digging into the fact that Hillary CLinton was working weapons deals and providing special access through the State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Holy ****...talk about a pending ****storm.......
 
Re: Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed foo

Is this really the worst you guys can come up with on Trump?

Um, no. Why do you think there are a hundred threads on the guy>
 
Re: Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed foo

If he bought it and did now use his own money to pay fore it as described in the news report........

What is is.....

And suggest just recounting what was.......

Is politically motivated and doesn't deserves the light of day because it make Trump look like the charlatan he is.......

Covering up the truth is dishonest and not the purpose of what journalism is.......

You can blame it all as politically motivated.......

But it that does not change the report of what he did........

Actually, a rational mind would read the WaPo's ideologically driven bogus screed, and realize they have nothing.

For example, they even state the following:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/01/donald-trump-used-money-donated-for-charity-to-buy-himself-a-tim-tebow-signed-football-helmet/

Excerpts:

The answer may depend on what became of the helmet and jersey.

If they are still in Trump's possession — perhaps on display at one of his homes or properties — that might be deemed improper, if the IRS ever looks.

So what happened to the the helmet and jersey? Where are they today? (The double "the" is theirs, not mine. More evidence of the immature brain trust running out this stuff)​


Admitted in their own article, the neophytes at WaPo demonstrate they have no clue where this infamous helmet is, why it was purchased, and for future use it was intended - but that doesn't stop their inflammatory rhetoric does it?

And it certainly doesn't stop like minded ideologues and paid shills from posting such garbage pretending their motivation is truth.

Again, any wonder why WaPo got the middle finger from Trump. I don't blame him.

Frankly, I like these posts, it better to let them bury any semblance of journalistic ethics, in writing, so they can be caught under an avalanche of bogus partisan blather they have devolved to.
 
Re: Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed foo

Actually, a rational mind would read the WaPo's ideologically driven bogus screed, and realize they have nothing.

For example, they even state the following:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/01/donald-trump-used-money-donated-for-charity-to-buy-himself-a-tim-tebow-signed-football-helmet/

Excerpts:

The answer may depend on what became of the helmet and jersey.

If they are still in Trump's possession — perhaps on display at one of his homes or properties — that might be deemed improper, if the IRS ever looks.

So what happened to the the helmet and jersey? Where are they today? (The double "the" is theirs, not mine. More evidence of the immature brain trust running out this stuff)​


Admitted in their own article, the neophytes at WaPo demonstrate they have no clue where this infamous helmet is, why it was purchased, and for future use it was intended - but that doesn't stop their inflammatory rhetoric does it?

And it certainly doesn't stop like minded ideologues and paid shills from posting such garbage pretending their motivation is truth.

Again, any wonder why WaPo got the middle finger from Trump. I don't blame him.

Frankly, I like these posts, it better to let them bury any semblance of journalistic ethics, in writing, so they can be caught under an avalanche of bogus partisan blather they have devolved to.

"ideologically driven bogus screed".........

Do you think someone who reads that can fairly conclude your post is biased?
 
Re: Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed foo

"ideologically driven bogus screed".........

Do you think someone who reads that can fairly conclude your post is biased?

Do you think someone who notices you dodged the facts presented in my post can fairly conclude your bias was the reason you did?
 
Re: Donald Trump used money donated for charity to buy himself a Tim Tebow-signed foo

Man...if it turns out that this is correct and Donald Trump actually bought a helmet from a charity (and paid $12,000.00 to the Susan Khomen foundation IN CHARITY for a helmet) taht could be a HUGE friggen scandal! If the OP and Washington Post are ****ting themselves over this I can only IMAGINE how much they are digging into the fact that Hillary CLinton was working weapons deals and providing special access through the State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Holy ****...talk about a pending ****storm.......

I would also criticize the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which heavily uses its "donations" to influence politics.

Charities are being abused as ways to evade taxes. If we're not going to regulate charities, then we shouldn't have the tax exemption.
 
Back
Top Bottom