• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Loretta Lynch an incompetent, or just another political crook and liar?

No one can accuse you of not being consistent.

I am not the subject of this thread. Loretta Lynch is.

It is my opinion that she is neither incompetent...nor "just another political crook and liar."
 
I am not the subject of this thread. Loretta Lynch is.

It is my opinion that she is neither incompetent...nor "just another political crook and liar."

I know you are not Frank. But since you volunteered your opinion, could you share how you came to that opinion?
 
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?


If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?

She's awesome!
 
I am not the subject of this thread. Loretta Lynch is.

It is my opinion that she is neither incompetent...nor "just another political crook and liar."

true, she's an affirmative action quota pick who was not anywhere near being the best person for the job.

what she is is a person who owes her ascendency to the racial politics of the Democrat party and its pinnacle of affirmative action-Obama
 
If the AG is going to go with the FBI recommendations, I'd say the odds have likely greatly increased of Hilary being indicted and likely Biden chosen as replacement by the party. My guess a Biden/Warren ticket.

You seem primed for a friendly wager. Let me know if you are interested, and if not, I'll know you don't believe the things you write.
 
true, she's an affirmative action quota pick who was not anywhere near being the best person for the job.

what she is is a person who owes her ascendency to the racial politics of the Democrat party and its pinnacle of affirmative action-Obama

You don't like her because she's black, but you're not alone. That's the main reason the GOP doesn't like her.
 
You don't like her because she's black, but you're not alone. That's the main reason the GOP doesn't like her.

that's horsecrap though her being black is why she is where she is. I don't like positions being based on one's race and that is clearly why she was chosen. She wasn't the best attorney in the entire DOJ-i can personally name 50 or so people with better credentials than she has-people who actually went to schools like Harvard Law based their grades and test scores not due to their race-

when she applied to Harvard in the fall of 1980, Blacks were given a .5 addition to their GPA and 130 points were added on to their LSAT scores. For white males attending say YALE in 1980, you were not assured entrance into harvard unless you were in the 775 range on the LSAT at a 3.8. that meant an extremely strong candidate from Yale or Duke or Stanford or Cornell who was white with a 750 and a 3.7 GPA was going to be placed behind a black who had a 660 LSAT score and a 3.3 GPA from an Ivy school.
 
You don't like her because she's black, but you're not alone. That's the main reason the GOP doesn't like her.

I don't like her because she is fat. Both stupid reasons, but all you got to defend the disrespect for her position and the law she has shown.
 
that's horsecrap though her being black is why she is where she is. I don't like positions being based on one's race and that is clearly why she was chosen. She wasn't the best attorney in the entire DOJ-i can personally name 50 or so people with better credentials than she has-people who actually went to schools like Harvard Law based their grades and test scores not due to their race-

when she applied to Harvard in the fall of 1980, Blacks were given a .5 addition to their GPA and 130 points were added on to their LSAT scores. For white males attending say YALE in 1980, you were not assured entrance into harvard unless you were in the 775 range on the LSAT at a 3.8. that meant an extremely strong candidate from Yale or Duke or Stanford or Cornell who was white with a 750 and a 3.7 GPA was going to be placed behind a black who had a 660 LSAT score and a 3.3 GPA from an Ivy school.

She is black, and you don't like it.
 
I don't like her because she is fat. Both stupid reasons, but all you got to defend the disrespect for her position and the law she has shown.

Pretty damn stupid. I'll agree with that.
 
Pretty damn stupid. I'll agree with that.

I said both reasons. That includes your reason she is disliked because she is black. And you just agreed it is stupid.
 
She is black, and you don't like it.

You're posting idiocy and we laugh at it. you just made that up and cannot refute my points. The Obama administration was the epitome of people being promoted past their level of competence due to their race or gender. and that is what I don't like. an administration that bases much of its action on rewarding interest groups, especially racial groups that supported the administration
 
You're posting idiocy and we laugh at it. you just made that up and cannot refute my points. The Obama administration was the epitome of people being promoted past their level of competence due to their race or gender. and that is what I don't like. an administration that bases much of its action on rewarding interest groups, especially racial groups that supported the administration

My point is you don't like black people. You cannot refute that. I have the evidence.
 
I said both reasons. That includes your reason she is disliked because she is black. And you just agreed it is stupid.

So I'm as stupid as you are?

Thanks.

Truth be told, I pointed out that the tortoise doesn't like Lynch because she's black, and you said you don't like Lynch because she's fat, and they are stupid reasons not to like someone.

We agree on that.
 
My point is you don't like black people. You cannot refute that. I have the evidence.

post it up noob. we can make fun of your pathetic argument I don't like the Obama administration. I don't like affirmative action at the governmental level. and I don't like Obama supporters who scream racism because they don't have any valid argument.
 
post it up noob. we can make fun of your pathetic argument I don't like the Obama administration. I don't like affirmative action at the governmental level. and I don't like Obama supporters who scream racism because they don't have any valid argument.

You don't like black people. You left that obvious fact out of your post.
 
I know you are not Frank. But since you volunteered your opinion, could you share how you came to that opinion?

I could, but I have decided that I do not want to do so.

It will have to suffice that it is my opinion that Loretta Lynch is not incompetent...nor "just another political crook and liar."

You obviously are of the opposite opinion...and I will not ask you about why you came to that opinion. It is sufficient for me that you are of the opinion.
 
true, she's an affirmative action quota pick who was not anywhere near being the best person for the job.

what she is is a person who owes her ascendency to the racial politics of the Democrat party and its pinnacle of affirmative action-Obama

Fair enough for you to have that opinion, Dude.

I certainly would not want to be the person mounting a strong objection to what you have said.
 
that's a silly comment because it assumes that anyone who would recommend that the lying bitch be charged with perjury and malfeasance in office is biased against the clinton crime family

Actually it means that there are no prosecutable offences based on past prosecution protocol.

In addition, attorneys noted that mishandling of diplomatic information that doesn’t have an obvious national security component to it probably couldn’t be prosecuted under the Espionage Act, which is the felony statute most widely cited in discussions of the potential legal fallout of the Clinton email flap.

Read more: Clinton emails: Past cases suggest Hillary won’t be indicted - POLITICO
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 
You don't like black people. You left that obvious fact out of your post.

you keep making that stupid claim over and over without any proof. How about some proof there rather than acting like a parrot. are you black?
 
Back
Top Bottom