- Joined
- Mar 17, 2016
- Messages
- 14,235
- Reaction score
- 1,453
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
She is neither.
Oh, the agony of the right!
Would you like to tell us why she is neither?
She is neither.
Oh, the agony of the right!
Would you like to tell us why she is neither?
Not especially.
No one can accuse you of not being consistent.
I am not the subject of this thread. Loretta Lynch is.
It is my opinion that she is neither incompetent...nor "just another political crook and liar."
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?
If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
If the AG is going to go with the FBI recommendations, I'd say the odds have likely greatly increased of Hilary being indicted and likely Biden chosen as replacement by the party. My guess a Biden/Warren ticket.
I am not the subject of this thread. Loretta Lynch is.
It is my opinion that she is neither incompetent...nor "just another political crook and liar."
If the AG is going to go with the FBI recommendations, I'd say the odds have likely greatly increased of Hilary being indicted and likely Biden chosen as replacement by the party. My guess a Biden/Warren ticket.
Actually there is no impartial lawyer who thinks there is a case against Hillary. The FBI will not recommend indictments.
Why Hillary Won't Be Indicted and Shouldn't Be: An Objective Legal Analysis
true, she's an affirmative action quota pick who was not anywhere near being the best person for the job.
what she is is a person who owes her ascendency to the racial politics of the Democrat party and its pinnacle of affirmative action-Obama
You don't like her because she's black, but you're not alone. That's the main reason the GOP doesn't like her.
You don't like her because she's black, but you're not alone. That's the main reason the GOP doesn't like her.
that's horsecrap though her being black is why she is where she is. I don't like positions being based on one's race and that is clearly why she was chosen. She wasn't the best attorney in the entire DOJ-i can personally name 50 or so people with better credentials than she has-people who actually went to schools like Harvard Law based their grades and test scores not due to their race-
when she applied to Harvard in the fall of 1980, Blacks were given a .5 addition to their GPA and 130 points were added on to their LSAT scores. For white males attending say YALE in 1980, you were not assured entrance into harvard unless you were in the 775 range on the LSAT at a 3.8. that meant an extremely strong candidate from Yale or Duke or Stanford or Cornell who was white with a 750 and a 3.7 GPA was going to be placed behind a black who had a 660 LSAT score and a 3.3 GPA from an Ivy school.
I don't like her because she is fat. Both stupid reasons, but all you got to defend the disrespect for her position and the law she has shown.
Pretty damn stupid. I'll agree with that.
She is black, and you don't like it.
You're posting idiocy and we laugh at it. you just made that up and cannot refute my points. The Obama administration was the epitome of people being promoted past their level of competence due to their race or gender. and that is what I don't like. an administration that bases much of its action on rewarding interest groups, especially racial groups that supported the administration
I said both reasons. That includes your reason she is disliked because she is black. And you just agreed it is stupid.
My point is you don't like black people. You cannot refute that. I have the evidence.
post it up noob. we can make fun of your pathetic argument I don't like the Obama administration. I don't like affirmative action at the governmental level. and I don't like Obama supporters who scream racism because they don't have any valid argument.
I know you are not Frank. But since you volunteered your opinion, could you share how you came to that opinion?
true, she's an affirmative action quota pick who was not anywhere near being the best person for the job.
what she is is a person who owes her ascendency to the racial politics of the Democrat party and its pinnacle of affirmative action-Obama
that's a silly comment because it assumes that anyone who would recommend that the lying bitch be charged with perjury and malfeasance in office is biased against the clinton crime family
In addition, attorneys noted that mishandling of diplomatic information that doesn’t have an obvious national security component to it probably couldn’t be prosecuted under the Espionage Act, which is the felony statute most widely cited in discussions of the potential legal fallout of the Clinton email flap.
You don't like black people. You left that obvious fact out of your post.