• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Six Diseases Return To US as Migration Advocates Celebrate ‘World Refugee Day’

No, it would as these invaders have drug resistance viruses.

And muzzies arent, right?

Since it was caused by an immigrant.

Ugh.

TheDemSocialist has already handily refuted you on this issue previously in this thread. All you're listing to is a bunch of Breibart fear mongering, which is a totally commonplace thing for them to do. The love capitalizing on people's irrational fears, like they are doing with you.
 
Ugh.

TheDemSocialist has already handily refuted you on this issue previously in this thread. All you're listing to is a bunch of Breibart fear mongering, which is a totally commonplace thing for them to do. The love capitalizing on people's irrational fears, like they are doing with you.

And all you do is offer nothing but "muh feelz" and then claim you are a better or more moral person. Your side is losing more and more ground every day.

Wanting to keep out threats or burdens is not "irrational" its a basic thing every nation has done since the beginning of time. Sorry you can not understand.

But hey enjoy the health, prosperity, and safety others provide for you.
 
Yes, we do. Are you are aware of the cost of refugees and the burdens of mass immigration?

Sessions: Obama's Syrian refugee plan to cost $55 billion, demands it be killed | Washington Examiner

The evidence doesn't support such an astronomical figure, it also indicates that they tend to be a net-benefit in terms of purely economic calculations in the long term. I'd be more than willing to resettle up to half a million or more refugees in the United States so I have no problem with the current plan. We should most certainly do our part.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ow-much-the-united-states-spends-on-refugees/
 
The evidence doesn't support such an astronomical figure, it also indicates that they tend to be a net-benefit in terms of purely economic calculations in the long term. I'd be more than willing to resettle up to half a million or more refugees in the United States so I have no problem with the current plan. We should most certainly do our part.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ow-much-the-united-states-spends-on-refugees/

Since they are so helpful to the economy I say we send them back so they can build up the economies where they came from.
 
Since they are so helpful to the economy I say we send them back so they can build up the economies where they came from.

It's hard to be economically fruitful in an active warzone. There is a reason they become refugees in the first place.
 
And all you do is offer nothing but "muh feelz" and then claim you are a better or more moral person. Your side is losing more and more ground every day.

...What? When did I ever claim I was morally superior to you? Because I didn't.

Wanting to keep out threats or burdens is not "irrational" its a basic thing every nation has done since the beginning of time. Sorry you can not understand.

Immigrants are not threats. The fact that you think they are is pretty damn saddening.

But hey enjoy the health, prosperity, and safety others provide for you.

Thanks, but I'll continue to provide for myself.
 
The evidence doesn't support such an astronomical figure, it also indicates that they tend to be a net-benefit in terms of purely economic calculations in the long term. I'd be more than willing to resettle up to half a million or more refugees in the United States so I have no problem with the current plan. We should most certainly do our part.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ow-much-the-united-states-spends-on-refugees/

They are not going to be a net gain at all, they do not speak the language, lack any basic education at all.

The High Cost of Resettling Middle Eastern Refugees | Center for Immigration Studies

Welfare Use by Legal and Illegal Immigrant Households | Center for Immigration Studies

You are clearly wrong and people like you need to be ignored on this issue, we have to much poverty, crime, and welfare cases in our own nation.

But glad to see you care more about others then your countrymen.

Never the boys from Somalian who are training with ISIS, right?
 
...What? When did I ever claim I was morally superior to you? Because I didn't.



Immigrants are not threats. The fact that you think they are is pretty damn saddening.



Thanks, but I'll continue to provide for myself.

Facts prove otherwise but glad to see you are bull pilled to the point over an overdose.
 
It's hard to be economically fruitful in an active warzone. There is a reason they become refugees in the first place.

I guess that is why those nations where so fruitful before the war, right?
 
Not our problem.

I disagree, and fortunately we live in a Democracy whereby we can elect leaders to represent our views. At present the prevailing view is that refugees should be brought here, the only difference is how many and how quickly.
 
They are not going to be a net gain at all, they do not speak the language, lack any basic education at all.

The High Cost of Resettling Middle Eastern Refugees | Center for Immigration Studies

Welfare Use by Legal and Illegal Immigrant Households | Center for Immigration Studies

You are clearly wrong and people like you need to be ignored on this issue, we have to much poverty, crime, and welfare cases in our own nation.

But glad to see you care more about others then your countrymen.

Never the boys from Somalian who are training with ISIS, right?

CIS is a deeply conservative Think Tank with iffy scholarship and troublesome political ties. It's why I opted for the Washington Post.
 
I disagree, and fortunately we live in a Democracy whereby we can elect leaders to represent our views. At present the prevailing view is that refugees should be brought here, the only difference is how many and how quickly.

Well you are wrong and our leaders are clearly fools. No, that is wrong LOL.

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...=UTF-8#q=majority+against+letting+in+refugees

How many? None! How soon? Now!

Its like you are so removed from what is happening its almost funny.
 
CIS is a deeply conservative Think Tank with iffy scholarship and troublesome political ties. It's why I opted for the Washington Post.

You have no retort and no come back so you have to attack the source like a beaten leftist.
 
Facts prove otherwise but glad to see you are bull pilled to the point over an overdose.

The facts prove you wrong, buddy. You just don't want to accept that, because you are too busy fear mongering.

I won't be a party to it.
 
I disagree, and fortunately we live in a Democracy whereby we can elect leaders to represent our views. At present the prevailing view is that refugees should be brought here, the only difference is how many and how quickly.

Ok then can they stay at the homes of the people that want them and you guys can pay for them on your own?
 
The facts prove you wrong, buddy. You just don't want to accept that, because you are too busy fear mongering.

I won't be a party to it.

To you, anyone bring up any threat no matter how valid is "fear mongering", guess 49 gay people in FL were victims of a false warning..Right?
 
Well you are wrong and our leaders are clearly fools. No, that is wrong LOL.

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...=UTF-8#q=majority+against+letting+in+refugees

How many? None! How soon? Now!

Its like you are so removed from what is happening its almost funny.

Our elected officials are more responsible than the mass of popular opinion in this instance and remain committed. Which is why even as we type there are refugees being prepared for entry into the country.
 
Ok then can they stay at the homes of the people that want them and you guys can pay for them on your own?

And if they do anything "snackbar related" will they be held civilly liable?
 
Ok then can they stay at the homes of the people that want them and you guys can pay for them on your own?

Nope. We're going to pay for them out of the general pool of funds made available by taxation. We don't govern or make policy by volunteerism.
 
To you, anyone bring up any threat no matter how valid is "fear mongering", guess 49 gay people in FL were victims of a false warning..Right?

Oh boy, now we're changing the subject.
 
You have no retort and no come back so you have to attack the source like a beaten leftist.

I'm not a leftist, I'm quite the Republican. If you bring me a better source I'd be happy to consider it.
 
Our elected officials are more responsible than the mass of popular opinion in this instance and remain committed. Which is why even as we type there are refugees being prepared for entry into the country.

popular opinion says they will not allow them in, or else they will get elected. .

Not for long, this program is a waste of funds and will be targeted for defunding. But glad to see you do not care about the millions of need people already in America.
 
Nope. We're going to pay for them out of the general pool of funds made available by taxation. We don't govern or make policy by volunteerism.

Nice of you liberals to volunteer our money, $19T in debt not good enough I guess.
 
Back
Top Bottom