• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump the Racist

legalimmigrant said:
Amongst???

They are all criminals by entering, and remain criminals during their entire stay by forging SS cards and working illegally.
Click to expand...

I was differentiating between those that were criminals before they crossed the border.
 
All people are prejudice. If it is towards race they are a racist. If it is towards women is it still racist since race is not involved but gender is. I have never met anyone that wasn't prejudice just the same as I have never met anyone that is not good and bad. It is how we handle such things that is important. I have met too many people that were racist but were very good at keeping it discrete. I have talked to many elderly people who still refer to black people as colored and mean no disrespect. They literally do not know any better and have fallen behind on the ever changing politically correct term to describe peoples race. Most people on this forum dropping the race card all the time prejudge people they have never met and really know nothing about first hand. This makes them prejudice and a racist. I have people say I am racist and have no idea what race, gender, or age I am. Which proves the people crying racist or prejudice are usually the people with a race and prejudice problem.
 
clownboy said:
Still waiting to see where Trump ever said that. That's a fiction spun by the desperate and bought by the gullible.
Click to expand...
When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.
Click to expand...

If you don't see anything wrong with that, we are done as there is nothing more to say.
 
clownboy said:
Mexicans hate him - would you say that's an accurate statement? Is it racist to call someone on their nationality? You have still failed to show racism. Tell us, when did you stop beating your wife? You see how that works?
Click to expand...
No, it is not. I believe at this time about 20% are still planning to vote for him. Hard for me to believe but that is what the polls say. You did not explain away Trumps racism, nor does the existence of other racist have any bearing on wether Trump is or not. Sort of a disappointing argument, kinda 3rd grade ish. The beating the wife thing isn't even close. Trump is a racist. He stated, repeatedly a Mexican (who isn't) cannot judge his case because of his heritage. Now, define racism in such a way this aint it. Otherwise I have to go with all the Republicans and everyone else who thinks Trump has made repeated racist comments. It is so obvious I am not sure how to more clearly explain it.
 
Last edited:
That judge is a racist America hater. He decided to help the Mexican criminals to continue being criminals while on welfare of the country whose laws they are violating.

If he is a true American without a hyphen, he should be on the other side helping to enforce the U.S. laws and get the Mexican scum out asap. I would.

Let's imagine a case where the judge is a son of Italian immigrants. He belongs to Lawyers for Mafia organization, and helps Italian mobsters to avoid deportations.

Now he is presiding over a case with a U.S. Attorney General as a defendant. There is only one little problem: that AG's mission is to go after the Italian mobsters.

See a problem or is it just me?
 
legalimmigrant said:
That judge is a racist America hater. He decided to help the Mexican criminals to continue being criminals while on welfare of the country whose laws they are violating.

If he is a true American without a hyphen, he should be on the other side helping to enforce the U.S. laws and get the Mexican scum out asap. I would.

Let's imagine a case where the judge is a son of Italian immigrants. He belongs to Lawyers for Mafia organization, and helps Italian mobsters to avoid deportations.

Now he is presiding over a case with a U.S. Attorney General as a defendant. There is only one little problem: that AG's mission is to go after the Italian mobsters.

See a problem or is it just me?
Click to expand...

literally every argument you made here is incorrect.
 
clownboy said:
Mexicans hate him - would you say that's an accurate statement? Is it racist to call someone on their nationality? You have still failed to show racism. Tell us, when did you stop beating your wife? You see how that works?
Click to expand...

Saying that someone is unsuitable to the exercise of public office because of their ethnicity is absolutely racist. It's no better when Trump does it than when liberals do it.
 
What year is this?
legalimmigrant said:
That judge is a racist America hater. He decided to help the Mexican criminals to continue being criminals while on welfare of the country whose laws they are violating.

If he is a true American without a hyphen, he should be on the other side helping to enforce the U.S. laws and get the Mexican scum out asap. I would.

Let's imagine a case where the judge is a son of Italian immigrants. He belongs to Lawyers for Mafia organization, and helps Italian mobsters to avoid deportations.

Now he is presiding over a case with a U.S. Attorney General as a defendant. There is only one little problem: that AG's mission is to go after the Italian mobsters.

See a problem or is it just me?
Click to expand...
 
bubbabgone said:
Just to level set, is LaRaza a racist organization?
Click to expand...

1. "La Raza" itself isn't an organization, it's a phrase that translates, variously, to "The People", "The Community", or "The Race".

2. The National Council of La Raza seems to be a racist organization.

3. Judge Curiel, however, is not a member of the National Council of La Raza.
 
americanwoman said:
If you don't see anything wrong with that, we are done as there is nothing more to say.
Click to expand...

I see that it doesn't say what YOU have been saying.

americanwoman said:
when you fall back on saying a nation is mostly rapists thats not just not saying wonderful things, it's offensive and in some ways, racist
Click to expand...

If you continue to lie and spin we are done and there is nothing more to say.
 
cpwill said:
Saying that someone is unsuitable to the exercise of public office because of their ethnicity is absolutely racist. It's no better when Trump does it than when liberals do it.
Click to expand...

Except he didn't say that. He's pointed to the judge's ethnicity to show the judge's bias. And he's correct. He shouldn't be trying this case.
 
MrT said:
What do you think it means? Do you think the term "bigot" would be more applicable to Trump?
Click to expand...

DJT is neither. You leftists simply have nothing on him so you people make it up as you go. DJT has clearly shown he is not PC enough for the far left, and has hired more people of all walks of life than the fringe left cares to knowledge. BTW, there's a lot of dems slipping over to DJT's side. You people are losing control. It's time to panic. :)
 
cpwill said:
1. "La Raza" itself isn't an organization, it's a phrase that translates, variously, to "The People", "The Community", or "The Race".

2. The National Council of La Raza seems to be a racist organization.

3. Judge Curiel, however, is not a member of the National Council of La Raza.
Click to expand...

Yeah, because it's sooooo much better that he belongs to a different La Raza group. :roll:
 
The problem here is you don't understand believing the judge's ethnicity shows the judge's bias is racism at its finest.
clownboy said:
Except he didn't say that. He's pointed to the judge's ethnicity to show the judge's bias. And he's correct. He shouldn't be trying this case.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
What does it mean and why isn't Trump one?
Click to expand...

What do you mean, what does it mean? You haven't proved DJT is a racist. You simply make false accusations and believe them true. Most thoughtful sane people don't make silly claims like that.
 
What is racism?
DamnYankee said:
What do you mean, what does it mean? You haven't proved DJT is a racist. You simply make false accusations and believe them true. Most thoughtful sane people don't make silly claims like that.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
No, it is not. I believe at this time about 20% are still planning to vote for him. Hard for me to believe but that is what the polls say. You did not explain away Trumps racism, nor does the existence of other racist have any bearing on wether Trump is or not. Sort of a disappointing argument, kinda 3rd grade ish. The beating the wife thing isn't even close. Trump is a racist. He stated, repeatedly a Mexican (who isn't) cannot judge his case because of his heritage. Now, define racism in such a way this aint it. Otherwise I have to go with all the Republicans and everyone else who thinks Trump has made repeated racist comments. It is so obvious I am not sure how to more clearly explain it.
Click to expand...

You're all over the place trying to defend having drunk the koolaid. You conflate race with nationality, ignore the national pride this judge still has for a country that supposedly is not his, and ignore the judge's political and personal bias.
 
mak2 said:
What is racism?
Click to expand...

Google is your friend. You have a computer literally right in front of you - use it.

rac·ism
/ˈrāˌsizəm/

noun
noun: racism

the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

•prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
Click to expand...
 
The only evidence you have this judge is incapable of doing his job is his ethnicity. Racism at its finest. Maybe this really will be Trumps downfall, but I doubt it. As far as I can tell all the Repubs that had reluctantly swung on board condemned the statement.
clownboy said:
You're all over the place trying to defend having drunk the koolaid. You conflate race with nationality, ignore the national pride this judge still has for a country that supposedly is not his, and ignore the judge's political and personal bias.
Click to expand...
 
DamnYankee said:
DJT is neither. You leftists simply have nothing on him so you people make it up as you go. DJT has clearly shown he is not PC enough for the far left, and has hired more people of all walks of life than the fringe left cares to knowledge. BTW, there's a lot of dems slipping over to DJT's side. You people are losing control. It's time to panic. :)
Click to expand...

:lamo

First, you didn't answer the question. How do you define racist?

Second, it is not just the "far left" that has denounced his comments as racist, let alone not "PC enough"

Third, the number of "dems" slipping over to the DJT side are miniscule compared to the share of every demographic, including Republicans, that are currently moving towards the Hillary side.
 
clownboy said:
You're all over the place trying to defend having drunk the koolaid. You conflate race with nationality, ignore the national pride this judge still has for a country that supposedly is not his, and ignore the judge's political and personal bias.
Click to expand...


the only bias the judge has is what you make up.
 
mak2 said:
The problem here is you don't understand believing the judge's ethnicity shows the judge's bias is racism at its finest.
Click to expand...

The problem here is you blind yourself to anything beyond that one factor. The judge's ethnicity AND his associations AND his history AND his actions AND his politics together show bias.
 
clownboy said:
Except he didn't say that [someone is unsuitable to the exercise of public office because of their ethnicity, but he did say that an American federal court judge was inherently biased because of his Mexican heritage]. He's pointed to the judge's ethnicity to show the judge's bias. And he's correct. He shouldn't be trying this case.
Click to expand...

And you really are able to parse out a difference between the two positions contained in bold?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom