• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Law Firm and Judge bringing Trump U case both tied to La Raza...

MickeyW said:
NEW YORK – The federal judge presiding over the Trump University class action lawsuit is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, a group that while not a branch of the National Council of La Raza, has ties to the controversial organization, which translates literally “The Race.”


Judge, law firm bringing Trump U case both tied to La Raza
Click to expand...



The Trump propaganda machine is in full gear.

It appears we have hit a soft spot as Mr Trump faces legal issues....

And all the happy Trumpets are following without question. One, IF Trump has an issue about bias, why haven't his lawyers filed to have him recused?

Is it because Trump's lawyers are incompetent assholes? He's always on about all these "Great People" he has, so how come he's crying on the public's shoulder, working up his rioters, er supporters to have his case tried in public. In other words, Trump is afraid of the result, and he's appealing tom mobism.

If it's not incompetence then it's exploitation of the "stupid voter." Either way the people who have created all these threads are frightened, one thread isn't enough...
 
TheDemSocialist said:
You can be white and support the Latino community. You can be black and support the Latino community. You can be asian and support the latino community. You can be a slav and support the latino community. You can be native american and support the latino community. Can you not?
Click to expand...

Sure....but if you are Latino, your bias, will reign supreme!

Being Latino has built in bias and I maintain that this guy should not be on this case of Trump's.
 
MickeyW said:
Sure....but if you are Latino, your bias, will reign supreme!

Being Latino has built in bias and I maintain that this guy should not be on this case of Trump's.
Click to expand...

:doh Lets forget your bigotry..... So you are essentially admitting you just made **** up in an attempt to justify Trumps bigotry.
 
Another massive Mickey FAIL thread....LOL
 
Redress said:
First, please warn when linking to WND. Some of us prefer not to give page views to conspiracy theory sites.

Second, the "ties" with NCLR is a link on a webpage.
Click to expand...

Your bias against me is right here and now.

You asked the other day for examples....you just gave me one.
WND gets it right...a lot.
Rebuking me on every thread that you respond to me...happens...here it is! I was right.

Redress said:
Neither Trump nor those bringing suit are Hispanic, so even if you where right(and, well, you aren't), the bias would not matter. To put it another way, I am biased against kidney beans(it is true, they are evil and make me vomit). This does not affect my choice between beef and pork.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter who is bringing the suit. That's not the point.
Trump is saying that this judge has built in bias against him...because Trump wants a wall and that is contrary to the judge's bias and his enrollment to this exclusive group.

Redress said:
Leaving aside the fact mentioned above that the plaintiff and defendant in the case are not Hispanic(making your claim moot), based on your criteria, almost every lawyer is racist, as almost all of them belong to exclusionary attorney groups.
Click to expand...

Almost every lawyer is racist? Really? I HIGHLY doubt that! Furthermore it flies in the face of liberalism.
That admission is tantamount to huge faux pa.
How can you, as a liberal....admit that? :2razz:

Redress said:
Nowhere in that does it say Latino only. So let's look at their actual rules, maybe that will tell us: SDLRLA Bylaws | San Diego's Latino/Latina Bar Association



Oops, major fail on your part.
Click to expand...

Get Real. Rules are broken or ignored all the time. I don't believe for one minute that a Conservative Attorney for the NRA, a religions organization or the Boy Scouts, would have a chance in hell of gaining membership!

Just a few examples.

Major Fail on your part!
 
cpwill said:
:lol: that is exactly what you said. You attempted to defend Trump's bigotry by pointing to Sotomayor's. Neither should be allowed or accepted, as both are fundamentally anti-American. :)

Meh, it depends on where you are and what you are talking about. Overtly, I could see that. But actually? Everyone is racist. See how you score.


:) It doesn't matter if you do or not - you are free to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Virtually every lawyer and judge in America is a member of one such association or another, and the association that you are desperately attempting to pivot to in order to get away from Trump's argument that Mexican Heritage Is Disqualifying is benign. :)
Click to expand...

What Soto said is typical, what Trump said was taken out of context and Trump is correct!
So, if a judge is very pro-gun, a member of 20 different gun groups and on the board of directors of some, should he/she be sitting on a case deciding a lawsuit against a firearms manufacture? And said plaintiff objected.......I guess that would be fine.
 
MrT said:
How many times is Trump going to double down on a clearly indefensible position?
Click to expand...

As long and as many times as it takes .

MrT said:
Holy **** MickeyW. You are just getting reamed here.

Please don't continue, it's getting painful to watch.
Click to expand...

I think you guys are all wet and I stand by what I said. The judge should recuse himself.

Moot said:
I think Sotomayor was talking about having diversity on the courts and not about judging a particular case.
Click to expand...

Not the way I read it! To her ..........diversity on the courts is ****ing Whitey!

Tanngrisnir said:
At least twice, in any case.

He's already stated that women and Muslim judges couldn't be impartial in his cases.
Click to expand...

For good reason.
 
MickeyW said:
For good reason.
Click to expand...

Indeed! Because he's a coward and a pugnacious bully used to getting his own way.

Pity for him our legal system doesn't work the way he's whining about.

Hope he doesn't end up in tears.
 
MickeyW said:
Your bias against me is right here and now.

You asked the other day for examples....you just gave me one.
WND gets it right...a lot.
Rebuking me on every thread that you respond to me...happens...here it is! I was right.
Click to expand...

Way to not respond to what was said. The connection between NCLR and the group the judge belongs to is a link on a webpage. That is from the WND article. See, you should actually address facts, not get all defensive like Trump.



It doesn't matter who is bringing the suit. That's not the point.
Trump is saying that this judge has built in bias against him...because Trump wants a wall and that is contrary to the judge's bias and his enrollment to this exclusive group.
Click to expand...

Ok, so are you then saying no judge can take a case for any one who does not agree with him or her politically? That would be kinda stupid. And how do you know the judge does not approve of the wall? You make all these assumptions based on race, and that is kinda stupid. You probably should not be a judge.


Almost every lawyer is racist? Really? I HIGHLY doubt that! Furthermore it flies in the face of liberalism.
That admission is tantamount to huge faux pa.
How can you, as a liberal....admit that? :2razz:
Click to expand...

Every lawyer, or at least most, belong to exclusionary lawyer groups. If we assume they are all biased, as you are doing, then we have a whole ****load fewer judges who can rule on any case.


Get Real. Rules are broken or ignored all the time. I don't believe for one minute that a Conservative Attorney for the NRA, a religions organization or the Boy Scouts, would have a chance in hell of gaining membership!

Just a few examples.

Major Fail on your part!
Click to expand...

So when you got caught making **** up, and that the rules are not what you thought, your reasoning now is that they may not follow the rules. Well thought out argument there, do keep up the good work...:roll:
 
This is getting more and more pathetic...
 
Redress said:
First, please warn when linking to WND. Some of us prefer not to give page views to conspiracy theory sites.

Second, the "ties" with NCLR is a link on a webpage.
Click to expand...

if you can't hover over a link before clicking it get off the internet
 
MickeyW said:
Sure....but if you are Latino, your bias, will reign supreme!

Being Latino has built in bias and I maintain that this guy should not be on this case of Trump's.
Click to expand...

That also goes you can't have an Asian judge conducting a case of non-Asians. Christian judges can't conduct court on catholics. Little short squatty guys can judge men over 6 foot.
 
ARealConservative said:
if you can't hover over a link before clicking it get off the internet
Click to expand...

What a contribution! You should be proud of your ability to add absolutely nothing to a conversation!
 
Redress said:
What a contribution! You should be proud of your ability to add absolutely nothing to a conversation!
Click to expand...

says the person that contributes nothing but a complaint because they are too ignorant of how technology works to hover over a link
 
ARealConservative said:
says the person that contributes nothing but a complaint because they are too ignorant of how technology works to hover over a link
Click to expand...

So you took one brief joking comment out of a significantly longer post, out of several posts, and claim it is all I contributed? Do you think no one will notice your dishonesty? Do you have anything to say about the topic? Why are you trying so hard to distract from the failure that is the premise of this thread?
 
redress said:
so you took one brief joking comment out of a significantly longer post, out of several posts, and claim it is all i contributed? Do you think no one will notice your dishonesty? Do you have anything to say about the topic? Why are you trying so hard to distract from the failure that is the premise of this thread?
Click to expand...

cookoo cookoo
 
Redress said:
So that would be a no, you cannot talk about the topic, nor answer questions, nor actually contribute.
Click to expand...

I posted on the comment of yours I wished to. why do you continue to troll about like you do? you come off as a crazy person IMO
 
ARealConservative said:
I posted on the comment of yours I wished to. why do you continue to troll about like you do? you come off as a crazy person IMO
Click to expand...

So you have nothing to say about the Trump U case? In a thread on the Trump U case that I have posted about on topic multiple times? And yet you say I am trolling?
 
MickeyW said:
Sure....but if you are Latino, your bias, will reign supreme!

Being Latino has built in bias and I maintain that this guy should not be on this case of Trump's.
Click to expand...

reasonably argued, your original case might have had a point, being that the previous ties led to an obvious bias, but simply accusing hispanics of being bias:shock:
 
* breathing out of both my nose and mouth *

-sound of exhaling - sort of a sigh.

I hate stupidity.

Oh, and people who don't know what they're talking about.
 
tres borrachos said:
Please tell me he was kidding. I mean, seriously....nobody can be that clueless. Can they?
Click to expand...

Its Mickey...he is.

BTW, I was at a NCLR National Council of La Raza convention once, the speakers were George W. Bush and Mitt Romney. They are in no way a radical group.

But..again, the trumpanzies are not right in the head.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom