• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Rape Culture: A Dire Crisis or Pure Nonsense?

It's a problem, however, the subjective lengths the abstractions go can be rather absurd.
 
I agree however if the statistic of 1 in 5 is going to be bandied around, we need to define what sexual assault is in this case.

That statistic has been completely debunked, the actual figure is less than 1 in 52, but feminists aren't known for their honesty so they continue to repeat demonstrably bad statistics to their gullible followers. They also regularly redefine what words mean to make it look more dangerous on their side. These people are sleaze.
 
Half of these leftist idiots think looking at someone the wrong way constitutes rape. These people are morons.

WHY do they claim Rape when someone looks at them in what they DEEM the wrong way?

Because the Grievance Industry gets them loads of money for it!

The heart of the false "Rape Epidemic" is a sick and twisted legal system!

-
 
The people who claim the US is steeped in "rape culture" are the same people who support imposed federal regulations that allow boys to walk into a girls locker room and mansplain girl on girl shower etiquette.
 
Last edited:
WHY do they claim Rape when someone looks at them in what they DEEM the wrong way?

Because the Grievance Industry gets them loads of money for it!

The heart of the false "Rape Epidemic" is a sick and twisted legal system!

-

My sister-in-law told me one time.

You are young, male, single so you are guilty.
 
it has no effect on the underlying cause of the attacks and limits the movements of evry one at most it should be a temporary measure till thats figured out

I hardly think limiting access to dorms and fraternity/sorority houses is something that is too onerous to implement. There are all kinds of places that has a similar setup and it's not a big deal. Pretty much all religious-based colleges run things like that. The military runs it in a similar manner, though barracks are now flipping to co-ed, once out of training. Of course, the co-ed barracks usually belong to the units who have co-ed jobs and have been for a while and the mentality is different. I'd be more concerned for females that shared barracks with artillery, infantry, tankers, ect. That would be like red meat in front of wolves.
 
My sister-in-law told me one time.

You are young, male, single so you are guilty.

Your sister-in-law is an idiot, I'm afraid.
 
My sister-in-law told me one time.

You are young, male, single so you are guilty.
What?! That's so unbelievably stupid. What is with this "You're a white male, therefore you are the scum of the earth" mentality?!
 
What?! That's so unbelievably stupid. What is with this "You're a white male, therefore you are the scum of the earth" mentality?!

But that's the problem with the regressive left's victimhood narrative. They have to find someone to blame for all of their own failures. They can never accept responsibility for where they've gone wrong.
 
Pure nonsense..

The real rape culture is the muslims in north africa where 1 in 3 men admit to raping a woman..
 
No argument there, but it is a mindset that men have to put up with.

No, we don't have to put up with it, we can call out that stupidity everywhere we find it.
 
Pure nonsense..

The real rape culture is the muslims in north africa where 1 in 3 men admit to raping a woman..

And the regressive asshats defend Islam. Go figure.
 
We need to define what Sexual Assault is.

Is this only full blown rape or is it an ass grab?

It's actually not that hard to define, though the definition of rape is very female centric. Rape is defined by various forms of penetration without the person's consent. Sexual assault is usually touching someone without consent for sexual gratification and the degree can change depending on where you touch them. For women it gets bumped up for the areas covered by a bikini and men would be the speedo area.

I say rape is female centric because of the penetration part. I'll demonstrate that with two scenarios:

1. Drunk female is taken to a back room by a male and he has traditional style intercourse with her in a state where she is unable to give consent. This would be rape.

2. Drunk male is taken to a back room by a female and she has traditional style intercourse with him in a state where he is unable to give consent. This would be some form of sexual assault, not rape.

In #2 the female would have to jam her finger up the dude's ass or something to get the rape charge which, honestly, ain't really happening.

P.S. Yes, ladies, the one-eyed snake definitely can work all on it's own. Men can get hard, even if it's against their will.
 
To call rare occurrences of rape on campuses a "rape culture" is ridiculous. You can't put broad labels on a place where that label rarely to never happens.

Very rarely we have teachers in the US who have sexual relationships with students. We don't call the teaching industry to be a "statutory rape culture", though.



I would not go so far as to call it a "culture of rape", but we have a BIG problem at least in Canada and I suspect much the same in the US.

We just went through a high profile 'celebrity rape' case where radio host Jian Gomeshe was found not guilty or multiple counts of sexual assault. The finding came as a result of a grueling cross examination by defense council that revealed inconsistencies in the witnesses, revealed that one of them had continued a relationship with him after the assault and on........

The end result of this, we know, is that women will be even more reticent to come forward. As a result of this men of that type will be more emboldened. This needs to become an issue.
 
I hardly think limiting access to dorms and fraternity/sorority houses is something that is too onerous to implement. There are all kinds of places that has a similar setup and it's not a big deal. Pretty much all religious-based colleges run things like that. The military runs it in a similar manner, though barracks are now flipping to co-ed, once out of training. Of course, the co-ed barracks usually belong to the units who have co-ed jobs and have been for a while and the mentality is different. I'd be more concerned for females that shared barracks with artillery, infantry, tankers, ect. That would be like red meat in front of wolves.

this 1 is going to far though

4. Or even, separate schools for men and women.

then isn't ther something wrong with?

artillery, infantry, tankers, ect.
 
this 1 is going to far though

4. Or even, separate schools for men and women.

then isn't ther something wrong with?

artillery, infantry, tankers, ect.

I don't think separate schools for men and women is necessarily needed. Just don't have co-ed dorms. This was actually the norm not too long ago and no one was acting like colleges were a prison. Why do you think co-ed dorms are so necessary? I really don't see what is gained by it at all.

As far as artillery, infantry, and tankers...is something wrong with them? I don't want to broad-brush but in some ways yes and some ways no. Some may not want to admit it but the military needs the hyper-masculine aggressive types of males in those jobs. These are people who are asked to directly engage the enemy, the warrior caste of the warrior caste of society. You don't get that type of thing without having to deal with other issues.
 
Back
Top Bottom