• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN Cuts Off Segment After Mention of Hillary's Accused Child Rapist Defense...

Μολὼν λαβέ;1065759642 said:
Hardly; Hillary's scumbag antics go all the way back to Watergate. But you keep believing... :notlook:
Click to expand...

I believe in facts only, so far we have seen claim after claim and yet not one charge has been filed and none look forthcoming. So until someone can make good on the claims that is all they will remain, claims.
 
The witch was never appointed to defend anyone. Some years later the prosecutor who asked her to represent the rapist started the lie that she was appointed by the judge. Had any of that been true, she would've offered it in that unguarded interview.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tor00iWUhDQ&feature=youtu.be
 
It's not that odd when you consider the case was likely thrown to prop this witch's early career. What were the results if they tested it? How would she know the crime lab threw away the bloody cut-out? I think it's more likely the prosecutor's office threw away the evidence. How extraordinarily ironic it is that the 12 year old victim was black.

 
The sickening lies of a megalomaniac.

 
Manc Skipper said:
She did the job of a defence lawyer. When guests become emotionally incontinent, it's normal to cut to the ads. That's why radio phone in callers are on a delay.
Click to expand...

All you are saying is that what that person(or his superiors) do not want heard can be censored. What a surprise.
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/229667084/State-of-Arkansas-V-Thomas-Alfred-Taylor

There's nothing in the case file about any lost or tested evidence that I can see. It magically skips to a plea agreement without any explanation for doing so. It very well could be that the story of lost underwear was entirely made up by the prosecutor as a gift to an up and coming Hillary Rodham. It's hard to imagine that sending out evidence for testing would not require filing a legal brief. I wonder if the Sheriff's Department still has Taylor's intact underwear with the vicitm's blood on it?



 
The wicked witch of Washington laughs at getting off a child rapist.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom