• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fact Checkers Prove That 91% of the Things Donald Trump Says Are False

You're saying he's right 9% of the time? I'm impressed.
 
Using politifact? What a joke.

uh uh ... it's IMYODA using PoliticusUSA using PolitiFact ... imagine the bilious putrefied brew you can distill from that? It ain't triple sec.
 
True Conservative.......... always go to hyper partisan..... Progressive attack sites........ because that's what........ being a Conservative.......... is all........

......
..
......................
About.

well done
 
Hillary is also a habitual liar, which doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of the things coming out of Donald's mouth are half-truths, exaggerations, and outright lies. You don't need to trust the bias or lack of bias of any news network. Just listen to the things that he says and try fact checking it. Most of it isn't even on the same planet as true.

Well I know he uses hyperbole a lot, and lies quite a lot. I'm not saying he isn't a dirtbag who needs to be put in a good scrap, and knocked silly, but I was trying to say it wasn't the best source to talk about a Republican candidate, despite Trump being the ESTABLISHMENT, he was a lobbyist, an insult, an insult to our democracy.
 
Using politifact? What a joke.

He made a claim and provided evidence.


As you are fully aware, politifact quotes politicians, links to proof of the quotation, and explains its rating of truthfulness. You should try proving that politifact is lying, rather than do a hit & run on the source.

Of course, I have to suspect that the reason you didn't try proving that politifact is lying is because you are fully aware that it is correct, and find it more important to simply run interference for the right.
 
If you're holding your breath waiting for a Pulitzer Prize for your comments you're going to end up out of breath and disappointed.
It figures you would provide a silly nonsensical reply.
You said to to explain away their prize. I didn't have to as it doesn't apply to the here and now and showing that the prize was also awarded for criticizing them in-part was just icing.
 
What a joke?
I didn't stutter.
A partisan site using partisan opinion.


Why is that.............most every one else is not laughing.............
At your source or of their quoting politifact? Yes folks are laughing.


nor is your comment anything more than an uninformed opinion someone taught you to say............
No, that would be your uninformed opinion.


And if may "school" you a tad.............an argument is to provide examples proving Politifact is unreliable..........Less that that6 is but BS dripping from one mouth
No, it is on you to show what they say is true as that is what you are holding them out to be.

Regardless they are still a joke.





He made a claim and provided evidence.
No he didn't.
Maybe you didn't get it because of the way he formatted his post, but what he provided was an article from a biased source reporting on what Politifact (a biased organization) opinionated on. (w/links)

What the poster did was to ask a question based on what was being reported. It is a begging the question fallacy as it assumes what was reported is accurate.
What is additionally funny is that they do not cover every statement made by Trump, so the headline is also a joke.


As you are fully aware, politifact quotes politicians, links to proof of the quotation, and explains its rating of truthfulness. You should try proving that politifact is lying, rather than do a hit & run on the source.

Of course, I have to suspect that the reason you didn't try proving that politifact is lying is because you are fully aware that it is correct, and find it more important to simply run interference for the right.
Of course I now have to suspect that you do not know how debate works.
As he provided the information he has to show they are being truthful.

Politifact as well as the source reporting on politifact's opinion's are biased and are therefore suspect from the get. As such it is incumbent on the poster to support what they are providing.


But the reality behind this is that it is a bs hit piece. For all intent and purpose politifact threw **** against a wall to see what sticks.
If one were to contest one of the claims which in fact is false, politifact or this above poster will will undoubtedly point to another amongst.

Yes, the biased source relying on the biased politifact is a "joke".
 
Back
Top Bottom