• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

To Stave Off Extinction, Protect “Half-Earth”

Joined
Feb 20, 2016
Messages
3,089
Reaction score
571
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
Last month, President Obama designated three new national monuments in the California desert: Mojave Trails, Sand to Snow, and Castle Mountains. All in all, the new monuments protect nearly two million acres of sand dunes, lava flows, snow-capped peaks, and Native American trading routes.

But if you add it all up, the tally of protected land in the U.S. is only about 14 percent; worldwide, it’s about the same. And that, argues Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson, isn’t nearly enough to stave off another mass extinction of the world’s biodiversity.

Wilson’s prescription for the planet, which he lays out in his new book Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life, is to set aside half the world’s lands and seas for nature to do its thing.

Let us know below what place on Earth you would set aside.

To Stave Off Extinction, Protect "Half-Earth" - Science Friday


Half-Earth proposes an achievable plan to save our imperiled biosphere: devote half the surface of the Earth to nature.

In order to stave off the mass extinction of species, including our own, we must move swiftly to preserve the biodiversity of our planet, says Edward O. Wilson in his most impassioned book to date. Half-Earth argues that the situation facing us is too large to be solved piecemeal and proposes a solution commensurate with the magnitude of the problem: dedicate fully half the surface of the Earth to nature.

If we are to undertake such an ambitious endeavor, we first must understand just what the biosphere is, why it's essential to our survival, and the manifold threats now facing it. In doing so, Wilson describes how our species, in only a mere blink of geological time, became the architects and rulers of this epoch and outlines the consequences of this that will affect all of life, both ours and the natural world, far into the future.

Half-Earth provides an enormously moving and naturalistic portrait of just what is being lost when we clip "twigs and eventually whole braches of life's family tree." In elegiac prose, Wilson documents the many ongoing extinctions that are imminent, paying tribute to creatures great and small, not the least of them the two Sumatran rhinos whom he encounters in captivity. Uniquely, Half-Earth considers not only the large animals and star species of plants but also the millions of invertebrate animals and microorganisms that, despite being overlooked, form the foundations of Earth's ecosystems.

In stinging language, he avers that the biosphere does not belong to us and addresses many fallacious notions such as the idea that ongoing extinctions can be balanced out by the introduction of alien species into new ecosystems or that extinct species might be brought back through cloning. This includes a critique of the "anthropocenists," a fashionable collection of revisionist environmentalists who believe that the human species alone can be saved through engineering and technology.

Despite the Earth's parlous condition, Wilson is no doomsayer, resigned to fatalism. Defying prevailing conventional wisdom, he suggests that we still have time to put aside half the Earth and identifies actual spots where Earth's biodiversity can still be reclaimed. Suffused with a profound Darwinian understanding of our planet's fragility, Half-Earth reverberates with an urgency like few other books, but it offers an attainable goal that we can strive for on behalf of all life.

BOOK DETAILS
Hardcover
March 2016
ISBN 978-1-63149-082-8
6.5 × 9.6 in / 272 pages
Sales Territory: Worldwide
ENDORSEMENTS & REVIEWS
“Edward O. Wilson possesses a rare, almost unique, combination of immense scientific knowledge and deep humane intelligence. Looking around him at the beloved natural world he has done so much to understand and taking the measure of the massive damage to it caused by human stupidity and greed, he has every reason to succumb to despair. But Half-Earth is not a bitter jeremiad. It is a brave expression of hope, a visionary blueprint for saving the planet.” — Stephen Greenblatt, author of The Swerve

“Wilson speaks with a humane eloquence which calls to us all.” — Oliver Sacks

“If humankind finds a way to live in peace together, and in harmony with nature, Wilson will have played a unique role in that deliverance.” — Jeffrey Sachs

Half-Earth | W. W. Norton & Company
 
Last month, President Obama designated three new national monuments in the California desert: Mojave Trails, Sand to Snow, and Castle Mountains. All in all, the new monuments protect nearly two million acres of sand dunes, lava flows, snow-capped peaks, and Native American trading routes.

But if you add it all up, the tally of protected land in the U.S. is only about 14 percent; worldwide, it’s about the same. And that, argues Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson, isn’t nearly enough to stave off another mass extinction of the world’s biodiversity.

Wilson’s prescription for the planet, which he lays out in his new book Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life, is to set aside half the world’s lands and seas for nature to do its thing.

Let us know below what place on Earth you would set aside.

To Stave Off Extinction, Protect "Half-Earth" - Science Friday


Half-Earth proposes an achievable plan to save our imperiled biosphere: devote half the surface of the Earth to nature.

In order to stave off the mass extinction of species, including our own, we must move swiftly to preserve the biodiversity of our planet, says Edward O. Wilson in his most impassioned book to date. Half-Earth argues that the situation facing us is too large to be solved piecemeal and proposes a solution commensurate with the magnitude of the problem: dedicate fully half the surface of the Earth to nature.

If we are to undertake such an ambitious endeavor, we first must understand just what the biosphere is, why it's essential to our survival, and the manifold threats now facing it. In doing so, Wilson describes how our species, in only a mere blink of geological time, became the architects and rulers of this epoch and outlines the consequences of this that will affect all of life, both ours and the natural world, far into the future.

Half-Earth provides an enormously moving and naturalistic portrait of just what is being lost when we clip "twigs and eventually whole braches of life's family tree." In elegiac prose, Wilson documents the many ongoing extinctions that are imminent, paying tribute to creatures great and small, not the least of them the two Sumatran rhinos whom he encounters in captivity. Uniquely, Half-Earth considers not only the large animals and star species of plants but also the millions of invertebrate animals and microorganisms that, despite being overlooked, form the foundations of Earth's ecosystems.

In stinging language, he avers that the biosphere does not belong to us and addresses many fallacious notions such as the idea that ongoing extinctions can be balanced out by the introduction of alien species into new ecosystems or that extinct species might be brought back through cloning. This includes a critique of the "anthropocenists," a fashionable collection of revisionist environmentalists who believe that the human species alone can be saved through engineering and technology.

Despite the Earth's parlous condition, Wilson is no doomsayer, resigned to fatalism. Defying prevailing conventional wisdom, he suggests that we still have time to put aside half the Earth and identifies actual spots where Earth's biodiversity can still be reclaimed. Suffused with a profound Darwinian understanding of our planet's fragility, Half-Earth reverberates with an urgency like few other books, but it offers an attainable goal that we can strive for on behalf of all life.

BOOK DETAILS
Hardcover
March 2016
ISBN 978-1-63149-082-8
6.5 × 9.6 in / 272 pages
Sales Territory: Worldwide
ENDORSEMENTS & REVIEWS
“Edward O. Wilson possesses a rare, almost unique, combination of immense scientific knowledge and deep humane intelligence. Looking around him at the beloved natural world he has done so much to understand and taking the measure of the massive damage to it caused by human stupidity and greed, he has every reason to succumb to despair. But Half-Earth is not a bitter jeremiad. It is a brave expression of hope, a visionary blueprint for saving the planet.” — Stephen Greenblatt, author of The Swerve

“Wilson speaks with a humane eloquence which calls to us all.” — Oliver Sacks

“If humankind finds a way to live in peace together, and in harmony with nature, Wilson will have played a unique role in that deliverance.” — Jeffrey Sachs

Half-Earth | W. W. Norton & Company

Hubris.
We can't do anything that will either save or endanger the planet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesis
 


George Carlin exposes the moronic arrogance of people.
 
George Carlin was a comedian, sir.
 
George Carlin was a comedian, sir.

So? He makes a lot more sense than the brain dead environmentalists who scream that the earth is somehow "dying" every single day.
 
So? He makes a lot more sense than the brain dead environmentalists who scream that the earth is somehow "dying" every single day.

you probably take the muppet show seriously too.
 
You really hate humans don't you.

not as much as you hate a healthy planet.

It's unsustainable and most people with some idea about things know this, however people want what they want in spite of the obvious and where there's a demand there will be a supply.
 
Last edited:
Sure beats sucking on asparagus all day long.

My wife cooked some of that crap last night. It smelled up the whole house. I declined to eat anything that smells pre-rotted.
 
WC Fields didn't like water, hurr hurr.

this thread isn't about eating, so why the post?
 
not as much as you hate a healthy planet.

It's unsustainable and most people with some idea about things know this, however people want what they want in spite of the obvious and where there's a demand there will be a supply.

You know that you have no science, no evidence, that the earth is not capable of easily supporting this level of human population.

Inspite of this your hatread of humanity is such that you want half of us to starve.
 
You know that you have no science, no evidence, that the earth is not capable of easily supporting this level of human population.

Inspite of this your hatread of humanity is such that you want half of us to starve.

did you read the article? if we were to preserve our fisheries we will actually have more fish long term. of course you didn't
 
not as much as you hate a healthy planet.

It's unsustainable and most people with some idea about things know this, however people want what they want in spite of the obvious and where there's a demand there will be a supply.

At least you know basic economic concepts, that's a step up from everything you've provided before ;)
 
did you read the article? if we were to preserve our fisheries we will actually have more fish long term. of course you didn't

We have to be a lot better at keeping fish stocks healthy and fishing in a decent way.

One of the many negative consequences of the fixation on CO2 has been the lack of attention on real environmental troubles.

Yet not using half the world is silly.

Presumably you would mean half of the world we now use. Because we use less than half the world's surface area today, land or sea.
 
We have to be a lot better at keeping fish stocks healthy and fishing in a decent way.

One of the many negative consequences of the fixation on CO2 has been the lack of attention on real environmental troubles.

Yet not using half the world is silly.

Presumably you would mean half of the world we now use. Because we use less than half the world's surface area today, land or sea.

we can agree on something. the world is overfished and not sustainable at present rate.
 
Back
Top Bottom