Is this cartoon racist.[W:62]

Flamethrower said:

Do you boycott redskin potatos?

Click to expand...

Is that a racial stereotype?

ecofarm said:

Is that a racial stereotype?

Click to expand...

Yes, like Native Americans, different vegtables and fruits have reddish skin coloring.

So, if you imagine that calling a Black person a Black, or a White a White, or a Redman a Redskin is racist, then you probably must imagine redskin potatos were named to insult Native Americans.

Flamethrower said:

You think as you have been programed to think over the years. Most Jews in the US have been so blended over the years, most look no different than average Whites. Of course with 80% of Hollywood Producers having Jewish linage, it's not suprising that there are 100 fims about Jewish suffering and the Holocaust for every 1 film about every other genocide of the 20th century. Look on Netflix and see for yourself. So if there were 100 films made on the Ukranian Holodomor or the Khemr Ruge for every 1 film on the Holocaust, then you'd be calling the Ukes or the Cambodians the world's great victims. I've worked, gone to school and hung out with many over the years and whatever suffering their ancestors had in past isn't a problem today.

Click to expand...

The Cambodian and Ukrainian examples were not racially motivated, they were just examples of the rather brutal means of gaining control that a couple of communists used. Let's not forget that we killed a good number of Cambodians civilians ourselves, though the word "genocide" isn't used.

As for the Jews, theirs is a unique situation. On racial and religious grounds, they were imprisoned, tortured and murdered until a large percentage of the worldwide population was decimated. The Soviets were not trying to kill ALL of the Ukrainians, Pol Pot did not try to kill ALL of the Cambodians. Hitler most definitely wanted to kill ALL jews.

The Black cult of victimhood can never seem to move past slavery or Jim Crow.

Click to expand...

It's not a cult, it's a collection of modern statistics and historical facts that point to the continued subjugation of black people. Your assessment of their status as victims is about as reductionist as they come, which always looks more than a little racist. You may fear that these facts will survive for 1,000 years and I don't doubt that they could. Each generation of white conservatives who do nothing to bring equity to that portion of society prolong the abuse in their own way. We can't solve problems that people refuse to acknowledge. The real cult is one of Anglo denial.

Blacks commit crimes at least 10 times more than Jews, Asians and Whites. Although 12% of the US population, their crimes far outweigh their numbers. Young Black males, although 1% of the population commit 25% of the murders here.

Click to expand...

As I said, you can't drive people into ignorance and poverty over the course of four centuries and then call them disproportionately criminal without considering how their social status limits their legal options. I see no appreciation in the average conservative for that fact.

No living young Black male for decades has experienced school segregation, Jim Crow laws or slavery.

Click to expand...

Now, that is a foolish statement. If you're not aware of how less likely a black person is to get a good public education, due to the racist way our school money is allocated, then I am arguing with a white-apologist and not a fair minded citizen who really gives a sh*!.

But what they do not apologize for is their thuggish lifestyle. Hardly any Black in media has had the courage to speak against this. It is the absoulte fault OF the Black community, and things will not improve unless they are held accountable.

Click to expand...

White thugs kept black people down for centuries, broke up their families, kept them out of college, made them politically impotent through various means and then, all of a sudden, decided everything was equal somehow. That is the height of thuggishness by American conservatives who don't just declare an arbitrary fresh start but who play dumb as to how these people could possibly have so much dysfunction in their lives. It really does approach evil, a word I rarely use, when you think about how dumb or dishonest someone would have to be not to see the big picture of the treatment of black people and to, in fact, use crime statistics that are divorced from statistics of African American abuses. Your agenda is as obvious as can be. Your humanity is better camouflaged.

D_NATURED said:

The Cambodian and Ukrainian examples were not racially motivated, they were just examples of the rather brutal means of gaining control that a couple of communists used. Let's not forget that we killed a good number of Cambodians civilians ourselves, though the word "genocide" isn't used.

As for the Jews, theirs is a unique situation. On racial and religious grounds, they were imprisoned, tortured and murdered until a large percentage of the worldwide population was decimated. The Soviets were not trying to kill ALL of the Ukrainians, Pol Pot did not try to kill ALL of the Cambodians. Hitler most definitely wanted to kill ALL jews.



It's not a cult, it's a collection of modern statistics and historical facts that point to the continued subjugation of black people. Your assessment of their status as victims is about as reductionist as they come, which always looks more than a little racist. You may fear that these facts will survive for 1,000 years and I don't doubt that they could. Each generation of white conservatives who do nothing to bring equity to that portion of society prolong the abuse in their own way. We can't solve problems that people refuse to acknowledge. The real cult is one of Anglo denial.



As I said, you can't drive people into ignorance and poverty over the course of four centuries and then call them disproportionately criminal without considering how their social status limits their legal options. I see no appreciation in the average conservative for that fact.




Now, that is a foolish statement. If you're not aware of how less likely a black person is to get a good public education, due to the racist way our school money is allocated, then I am arguing with a white-apologist and not a fair minded citizen who really gives a sh*!.



White thugs kept black people down for centuries, broke up their families, kept them out of college, made them politically impotent through various means and then, all of a sudden, decided everything was equal somehow. That is the height of thuggishness by American conservatives who don't just declare an arbitrary fresh start but who play dumb as to how these people could possibly have so much dysfunction in their lives. It really does approach evil, a word I rarely use, when you think about how dumb or dishonest someone would have to be not to see the big picture of the treatment of black people and to, in fact, use crime statistics that are divorced from statistics of African American abuses. Your agenda is as obvious as can be. Your humanity is better camouflaged.

Click to expand...

I see little chance that you can get past your narrow, liberal views of Black history that have been so ingrained into your being.

Blaming Whites for everything bad today is a great defence mechanism. But what about Blacks today? Why is the longest running free Black nation in the world, Haiti, still at the bottom after 200 years of freedom from White racism? Who are the people giving them all the aid over the last 100 years? Has it been other Black Nations? NO.

So, if you are anti-slavery. Why is there no great outcry against the Arabs? To this very day, they have been the premier slave traders and clients for slaves over the last 1400 years. Slavery was last "legally" abolished in Arab nations. And slaves can still be bought and sold in many African nations. Please state the last time a large group of Western Whites enslaved any Blacks???? The last time Arabs and Islamic kidnapped and enslaved Blacks was today. How many of your Black heroes in Hollywood are taking action against the Islmaic slavers who kidnapped over 100 Black girls in Nigeria?

In fact, name one majority Black nation in the world that is doing well---even as well as a 3rd world craphole like Mexico?

Just one?

Flamethrower said:

Yes, like Native Americans, different vegtables and fruits have reddish skin coloring.

So, if you imagine that calling a Black person a Black, or a White a White, or a Redman a Redskin is racist, then you probably must imagine redskin potatos were named to insult Native Americans.

Click to expand...

That's weak BS. No characteristic or trait is attributed to red potatoes.

ecofarm said:

View attachment 67177954


Is this cartoon racist and/or antisemitic? Not to mention the presumably hairy armed woman.

I vote yes, very much so.

Click to expand...

The way the characters are drawn is racist,not the message.The message is a template used by the liberal media,The template being that a criminal who happens to black does something and gets in trouble as a result of his actions, liberal media gives soap box to race antagonists,alleged witnesses who claim the criminal did nothing wrong,then a interview with the criminal's family who claims the criminal did nothing wrong and a liberal retard claiming white privilege, and a scumbag lawyer defending the criminal.