You are a hard core partisan. You ignore all the bills that get buried in the other direction. Either there is concensus on both sides of the aisle that a bill is good for the country or there isn't. Without concensus it meets my definition of a bad bill regardless of whether it is what you or I want or not. You may be less angry if you find a way to look past the emotion.
No, I'm just capable of analyzing the facts and reaching an informed conclusion. I don't care which party proposes a bill. I care if it's a good bill. I am also capable of seeing that the good ones seldom originate from one of the parties. But if they did have a good one, I'd be loudly for it, just like with any good idea that would benefit the nation.
The charge was that it was one-half of one-third of government (House Republicans) preventing the government from doing anything. The fact that the House passed three-hundred bills they are willing to defend to the public, proves the charges false. It is Democrat Harry Reid blocking all progress, not Republican's. And if you read your constitution, you'd know revenue bills must initiate in the House, unlike Obamacare which initiated in the senate as a revenue-generating bill, passed under revenue rules and ruled a revenue bill by SCOTUS.
Again, those three hundred bills that the house has tossed out are mostly crap. There are dozens of bills to repeal or cripple Obamacare (which would be bad for the country), deregulation to allow corporations to pollute more and consolidate into monopolies, and just straight up gifts to their corporate donors. Please, do you have any examples of a bill from the house that would be a boon to the nation that the senate is sitting on? As above, if there are good laws that need to be passed to help this country, then no one should be standing in the way. But the house Republicans don't get to whine by virtue of passing lots and lots of crap.
Notice how Democrats refuse to tax the super-rich? Why do super-rich pay less than secretaries, whenever Democrats are in charge?
Your chart lacks any kind of date or context, but the president has called for taxing the super rich several times. The Republicans always shout him down and call him a communist. Likewise, the super rich have been paying less than their secretaries (suddenly you think Warren Buffet is legit now?) for a long time, under Democrats and Republicans alike.
Despite Democrat tax-breaks for the super-rich, corporate taxes are still higher than every single country in the world.
Both of these assertions are completely wrong. Democrats are trying to get the rich to actually pay their taxes, rather than use all kinds of tricks to pay nothing. Likewise, American corporate taxes aren't higher than the rest of the world. They're on the lower end of industrialized nations. Seriously, do you do any research yourself or just parrot what you hear from right wing propaganda media?
Pretty much the rest of your post is shouty emotional nonsense with no grounding in reality, so I won't quote it. Suffice to say that you have no understanding whatsoever of your political opponents. Not what they want, not how they think, not what they care about, and certainly not the hardships that they face that you don't.
