Thread: Why Do Conservatives Deny The Existence Of The Population Management Crisis

Originally Posted by American

Nobody told city dwellers they had to live in the city. It's their own dumbass fault if they stay there. And the OP is ridiculously overexaggerating.

Actually, the OP is slightly understated, as it didn't specifically list what it described as additionally deleterious effects of the population mismangement crisis.

Regardless, I see you've yet to answer the poll?

Originally Posted by American

Nobody told city dwellers they had to live in the city. It's their own dumbass fault if they stay there. And the OP is ridiculously overexaggerating.

American you are going to regret those words when the planet earth shrinks to the size of Texas and we all have to live in the painful conditions of New York City, where sometimes you have to walk for ten minutes to find a Starbucks.

Originally Posted by Camlon

Yes. Some people in Africa is going to starve anyway, but we should try to avoid mass starvation on humanitarian basis.

So it's more humane to tell people that they can't have children?
Odd form of humanitarianism.

Originally Posted by Camlon

What is your point, that I go straight to the point and are not politically correct?

It's that your point is dumb.
Immigrants, regardless of country of origin are not a net negative, providing that they are productive and lawful.

Originally Posted by Camlon

And as I have pointed out before. That is not going to change. In fact it is probably going to get worse, because bad farming practices from today will make the land infertile. With the kind of governments they have today, they will not be able to stand that many people, and there will be more starvation.

The evidence is in the opposite direction.
The Guinea Savannah, in Africa alone, is large enough to support the entire worlds grain needs.
At this point, you're only speculating and it's poor speculation at that.

Originally Posted by Harry Guerrilla

So it's more humane to tell people that they can't have children?
Odd form of humanitarianism.

Is starvation more humanitarian than family planning. Are you even serious?

It's that your point is dumb.
Immigrants, regardless of country of origin are not a net negative, providing that they are productive and lawful.

Now you are just jumping ships. First you talked about morals, and now you are going over to economics. Immigration can be both negative and positive depending on who is coming. Unqualified African immigration to Europe is a massive negative.

The evidence is in the opposite direction.
The Guinea Savannah, in Africa alone, is large enough to support the entire worlds grain needs.
At this point, you're only speculating and it's poor speculation at that.

So if we had very efficient farming, in a huge area of Africa, then that would only cover the worlds need of grains. That's not very impressive, especially considering the inefficiency of African farm production.

Please provide evidence if you believe it is in the opposite direction. But you need to provide that evidence. To state that Africa could produce a lot more food, is not really an argument. Yes, they can produce more food, but will they be able to? Or will they just squander the farmland/water, which is common in many third world countries. Nigerias population is expected to rise to 450 million people in 2050. That is a not a large area. How are they going to feed themselves? There are already starvation in Nigeria. Many countries in Africa is already dependant on food support.