
Originally Posted by
Kandahar
Indeed it is a question of framing...which is exactly why I'm going to call bull**** on this survey. Let's look at the way the question was framed to the people being polled: They asked them the "Most appropriate top tax rate for families earning $250,000 or more." Then they gave them MULTIPLE CHOICE responses: Less than 20%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, or more than 45%.
Any marketing guru can tell you exactly why that's a bad way to conduct a survey. If you give people multiple choices, most of them will gravitate toward the middle because they want to sound reasonable. By framing a tax rate of only 5% above what's actually being proposed as the "extreme liberal" position, while framing a tax rate nearly 20% lower than what's being proposed as the "extreme conservative" position, it's not surprising that people will gravitate toward a lower tax rate than what currently exists. I could easily design a poll question to show just the opposite, by giving people multiple choice options of "Less than 35%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, or more than 60%." Again, people would gravitate toward the middle choices.
Furthermore, the idea of having the American people voice their opinion on the "appropriate" tax rate doesn't tell you very much...most of them don't even know what tax rate THEY pay, let alone what tax rate the wealthiest people in the country pay. At best, they'll have a vague idea of whether they think top tax rates should be higher, lower, or the same...and even that opinion usually isn't very well-informed.
Finally, I'd like to point out that this question is being asked in a vacuum without consideration for other budgetary changes, so I question how meaningful the results of ANY of these types of polls are. Sure, everyone likes low taxes; no one likes paying more to the government. People want low taxes, high spending, low deficits, and a free pony. Unfortunately, they can't have all of those things.
EDIT: I'm not sure that even if this survey *did* provide quality data (which it obviously doesn't), that it would actually support your case. It would just mean that people support lower MARGINAL tax rates. Well, so do many liberals. So does Barack Obama. It's just a question of what reforms to the tax code would need to be made to accomplish that.