• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Post your political debate annoyances here...[W: 585]

Similar to that, in any thread where the premise is what people feel a law should be, inevitably some yahoo comes along and states what the law is... and just leaves it hanging like they solved the issue. Duh, we know that, numbnuts.
I've only seen it recently.
 
"...as I've clearly stated...", or some variant.

Being adamant about it doesn't automatically make you right.
 
"See how that works?"

First off, it's insulting and condescending.

Second, yeah, I "see how that works". I also see that you and/or it are wrong.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Any response that begins with... WRONG.
Still annoys me. It doesn't matter if you're someone I normally agree with, if you start a post with this I stop reading right there. It doesn't matter if you go on to say something I would agree with or not, it's just rude.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Any variation of, "I accept your concession."

Has to be one of the lamest retorts possible. Is that all you got? Apparently, it is.

Translation: "I got nothing, but I simply cannot let you have the last word, so I'll act all indignant and declare victory."

Seriously, :roll:
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Accusations that the other person doesn't understand the English language, or that comprehension is beyond their capabilities.

Grow the eff up. Debate the topic, or concede.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Folks who won't let a thread die.












(Totally joking)
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Hey, I have something to complain about, and you're going to hear about it. ;)

Actually I haven't seen too much you've said that I disagree with.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Calling the quibbling that mostly goes on here...DEBATE.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Confusing correlation with causation. People, two lines on a graph that run in parallel to each other are NOT proof that they are connected. There's a whole website out there that illustrates this (Spurious Correlations). Just because you see something that backs up your particular ideology does not mean that it's true. It may indicate that there is something to look into, but it isn't proof. Correlation is a starting point to finding a causal relationship and not proof of it.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Confusing correlation with causation. People, two lines on a graph that run in parallel to each other are NOT proof that they are connected. There's a whole website out there that illustrates this (Spurious Correlations). Just because you see something that backs up your particular ideology does not mean that it's true. It may indicate that there is something to look into, but it isn't proof. Correlation is a starting point to finding a causal relationship and not proof of it.
Completely agree.

Plus, too many people don't seem to understand the difference between "evidence" and "proof". Someone will say, "There is not a shred of evidence...", when their context is they are dismissing a lack of proof. No, there's evidence, plenty of evidence, but not proof. There is a distinct difference between the two.

I will have to check out that link later. Cannot right now.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Completely agree.

Plus, too many people don't seem to understand the difference between "evidence" and "proof". Someone will say, "There is not a shred of evidence...", when their context is they are dismissing a lack of proof. No, there's evidence, plenty of evidence, but not proof. There is a distinct difference between the two.

I will have to check out that link later. Cannot right now.

If you go to the bottom of the main page, there's a link for "Discover Correlations" that's the best part of the whole site.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Faux denial.

When someone engages in debate over the course of several hours and several posts, then suddenly claims, "I don't care."
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Ideology is the Chimpanzee part of the brain at work - and no one looks good flinging poop.
 
Re: Post your political debate annoyances here...

Is it possible to simply disagree? Or, do we have to be right and victorious all the time?
 
Back
Top Bottom