<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Debate Politics Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/</link>
		<description>Non-biased and non-partisan political forums. Debate topics may include breaking news today, media bias, abortion, warfare, conspiracy theories, economics, climate change and health care discussion.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:21:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>NAACP, Left-Leaning Media Groups Form Tea Party Tracking Site</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80844-naacp-left-leaning-media-groups-form-tea-party-tracking-site.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote--- 
A new website sponsored by the NAACP and left-leaning media operations is seeking videographers and bloggers who will search out "racism" and "extremism" among Tea Partiers. 
 
Teapartytracker.org will feature tweets, interviews with people at rallies, blog entries and a picture of a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			A new website sponsored by the NAACP and left-leaning media operations is seeking videographers and bloggers who will search out &quot;racism&quot; and &quot;extremism&quot; among Tea Partiers.<br />
<br />
Teapartytracker.org will feature tweets, interviews with people at rallies, blog entries and a picture of a t-shirt they say someone spotted at a rally that reads &quot;Blacks own slaves in Mauitania, Sudan, Niger &amp; Haiti.&quot;<br />
<br />
The site, sponsored by the NAACP, Think Progress, New Left Media and Media Matters for America, will monitor &quot;racism and other forms of extremism within the Tea Party movement. We call on the Tea Party to repudiate extremists among their ranks and join in civil dialogue with all Americans.&quot;
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/02/naacp-left-groups-form-tea-party-tracking-site/" target="_blank">FOXNews.com - NAACP, Left-Leaning Media Groups Form Tea Party Tracking Site</a><br />
<br />
George Soros, at it again.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/">*Breaking News* - Mainstream Media</category>
			<dc:creator>MrVicchio</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80844-naacp-left-leaning-media-groups-form-tea-party-tracking-site.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Analysts: White House Panicking Over Elections</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80843-analysts-white-house-panicking-over-elections.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:23:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote--- 
(CBS)  With many polls indicating the Republicans may win back control of the House of Representatives (and possibly the Senate as well) in the upcoming mid-term elections, Jim VandeHei, the executive editor of Politico, told CBS' "Face the Nation" that the Obama administration is in a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			(CBS)  With many polls indicating the Republicans may win back control of the House of Representatives (and possibly the Senate as well) in the upcoming mid-term elections, Jim VandeHei, the executive editor of Politico, told CBS' &quot;Face the Nation&quot; that the Obama administration is in a horrible position. <br />
<br />
&quot;Does the White House understand this?&quot; asked guest host Harry Smith. &quot;Do you feel any sense of panic or concern&quot; on the part of the administration? <br />
<br />
&quot;They get it. There's panic. There's concern,&quot; VandeHei said. &quot;The reality for this administration stinks, politically and practically, when it comes to the economy. You're not going to be able to change that 9.6-percent unemployment figure. You can't get anything from Congress in the next couple of months.&quot; <br />
<br />
=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\<br />
<br />
&quot;There's a lot of frustration on Capitol Hill among Democrats who feel like the President led them down this path. They didn't all necessarily want to deal with health care. This was on the president's agenda, and then they felt like he kind of hung them out to dry.&quot; <br />
<br />
&quot;Not a single Democrat has run an ad in support of the health care bill since April,&quot; VandeHei noted. <br />
<br />
Cordes pointed out that Democrats are very unhappy about Mr. Obama's speech last week, only the second Oval Office prime time address in his presidency. <br />
<br />
&quot;What does he talk about? Not the economy, but Iraq,&quot; Cordes said. &quot;And they say, 'No, we need to own the economy. If you’re going to use the power of your office to give a speech like that, talk about the economy.&quot; 
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/05/ftn/main6837589.shtml" target="_blank">Analysts: White House Panicking Over Elections - Face The Nation - CBS News</a><br />
<br />
Panic?  In the White House?  I find that hard to believe, I haven't seen anything from the WH to indicate they realize that Nov. is going to be, horrific for them.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/">*Breaking News* - Mainstream Media</category>
			<dc:creator>MrVicchio</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80843-analysts-white-house-panicking-over-elections.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Why are women happier than men?</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/80841-why-women-happier-than-men.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Women happier than men, survey says... 
 
This is obviously inaccurate information.. right?  :2razz: 
 
Women happier than men: survey | Stuff.co.nz (http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wellbeing/3910665/Women-happier-than-men-survey)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Women happier than men, survey says...<br />
<br />
This is obviously inaccurate information.. right?  :2razz:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wellbeing/3910665/Women-happier-than-men-survey" target="_blank">Women happier than men: survey | Stuff.co.nz</a></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/">Polls</category>
			<dc:creator>Bodhisattva</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/80841-why-women-happier-than-men.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Tea Party' off Michigan ballot]]></title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80840-tea-party-off-michigan-ballot.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Not the one you think: 
 
'Tea Party' off Michigan ballot | detnews.com | The Detroit News (http://www.detnews.com/article/20100903/POLITICS02/9030434/-Tea-Party--off-Michigan-ballot) 
 
 
---Quote--- 
The Michigan Supreme Court ruled today the controversial Tea Party group -- *criticized as a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Not the one you think:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20100903/POLITICS02/9030434/-Tea-Party--off-Michigan-ballot" target="_blank">'Tea Party' off Michigan ballot | detnews.com | The Detroit News</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			The Michigan Supreme Court ruled today the controversial Tea Party group -- <b>criticized as a Democratic ploy to siphon votes away from Republicans </b>-- will not be on the November ballot. &quot;We are definitely pleased that the scam that was being perpetrated has been stopped,&quot; said John Pirich, an attorney for tea party groups around the state. &quot;We also hope that the investigation into this activity proceeds as expeditiously as possible.&quot;
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> ...<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b>The ruling comes a day after The Detroit News reported links between Democrats and The Tea Party group</b> with 23 candidates that included the former stepmother of the former leader of the Oakland County Democratic Party being recruited to run as well as another candidate who had placed last in a 2008 Democratic primary.<b> The scandal over The Tea Party group forced the resignation of Mike McGuinness, the former Oakland County Democratic chairman, and the firing of Jason Bauer, an organizer for the county Democrats who has been accused of notarizing many of the nominations.</b><br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
<b>Susan Qashat, a Tea Party candidate for the 26th district house seat, told The News in an interview Thursday she thought she was running for an office to help the Democrats but later learned it was The Tea Party her former stepson, McGuinness, had signed her up for. &quot;I was surprised as hell when someone called and said you're a candidate for The Tea Party,&quot; Qashat said. &quot;The Tea Party is a Republican movement. I'm a full-fledged Democrat.</b>&quot;
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> Crap like this is never good for democracy, regardless of who's behind it.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/">*Breaking News* - Mainstream Media</category>
			<dc:creator>RightinNYC</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80840-tea-party-off-michigan-ballot.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Why Americans Elect Awful Presidents</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-partisan-politics-and-political-platforms/80839-why-americans-elect-awful-presidents.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:08:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>For years I muttered mentally to myself about the insanity of Americans electing George W. Bush president.  Now I go through the same agony about the craziness of the nation electing Barack Obama president.  As much as I thought Bush was a manipulated second-rate politician that carried out the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>For years I muttered mentally to myself about the insanity of Americans electing George W. Bush president.  Now I go through the same agony about the craziness of the nation electing Barack Obama president.  As much as I thought Bush was a manipulated second-rate politician that carried out the terribly destructive policies pushed by Cheney and other conservative corporate shills, now I feel equally angry that so many voters fell for the slick rhetoric and lies of Obama.  Disgust produces public thirst for change and Obama was wickedly brilliant at selling change.  When voters are so easily victimized what does democracy amount to?<br />
<br />
All this tells me that any nation that can elect such inept people president can also elect other people that appear to have no right or chance to be president of the United States just as Bush and Obama once appeared before they were sold to the public.  That is what is so frightening about the future of this nation.  The two-party plutocracy with its stranglehold on the American political system has the power to elect presidents that are an insult to the great ones that once served the nation with pride and competence.<br />
<br />
I keep searching for explanations why millions of American voters make such bad electoral decisions.  Are they just so stupid, uninformed and distracted that they fall for endless political lies?  Have Americans become so easily manipulated and fooled by advertising and brilliant political campaigns that they can be sold terrible presidents as easily as unneeded, low quality and unhealthy products?<br />
<br />
Yes, all this seems too true.  Delusional voters have produced our delusional democracy which strongly favors corporate, wealthy and elitist interests over ordinary Americans.  This explains frightening economic inequality and the demise of the middle class.  In the late 1970s, the richest 1 percent of American families took in about 9 percent of the nation’s total income; by 2007, the top 1 percent took in 23.5 percent of total income (less than 5 million people).  Two-thirds of the nation’s total income gains from 2002 to 2007 flowed to this sliver of households, which saw a rise of 62 percent, compared to 4 percent for the bottom 90 percent of households.  Today, the median male worker earns less, adjusted for inflation, than he did 30 years ago.  A corrupt bipartisan system gave us this.  Is this the change you were waiting for?<br />
<br />
Considering Bush and Obama from a right-left perspective misses their several critical commonalities.  Both have wasted the nation’s wealth and lives on two ludicrous, unnecessary wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Both turned out to be pretty good communicators during their presidential campaigns but quite lousy after they became president.  The more intelligent and articulate Obama is particularly striking in being totally lackluster when it comes to addressing major issues and crises and building public support for his policies, which now explains his very low approval ratings.<br />
<br />
Both pursued public policies and government programs that preferentially benefit corporate and other special interests, especially the financial sector.  This is no surprise because both depended on huge amounts of corporate money to get elected.  They both have responsibility for the economic meltdown that still exists for a large fraction of the nation.  A large majority of Americans correctly see the nation on the wrong track, but more importantly it is hurtling down the wrong track, which President Obama ignores, because he lacks solutions.<br />
<br />
What may turn out to be the most disturbing similarity is that Obama may get elected for a second term just like Bush accomplished despite uninspiring performance.  If there is anything more disturbing than electing awful politicians with no real record of accomplishments it is reelecting them for a second term!  More than anything else this demonstrates the absence of true, effective political competition and the ability to brainwash and manipulate voters.<br />
<br />
For years I hoped that some third party presidential candidate would emerge, capture public confidence and offer a true reform program to repair our nation.  But sadly the political system has been so corrupted that no third party presidential candidate stands a chance against the two-party plutocracy.  The biggest nonsense is that the US is the greatest democracy on Earth.  There are many other democracies where multiple political parties give citizens far more choices than Americans have.  It pays to remember that no nation ever copied the government structure of the US.  Instead, other democracies where citizens also have freedom use parliamentary structures with far more political choices and even the ability to more easily get rid of rotten leaders.  Here we suffer with disappointing presidents for far too many years.<br />
<br />
The most fascinating aspect of our constitutional republic is that one constitutional path to get true, deep reforms of our government and political system has never been used.  This proves how powerful, entrenched interests on the right and left have maintained a corrupt, dysfunctional and costly system.  Very, very few Americans know anything about the option in Article V of the Constitution for a convention of state delegates that could propose constitutional amendments.  You can learn the facts at the Friends of the Article V Convention website.  The one and only requirement for a convention has long been met but Congress refuses to obey the Constitution.  They fear it.  We need it more than ever.<br />
<br />
A constitutional scholar such as President Obama could make history by openly demanding that Congress convene the first Article V convention.  But that would require dropping the constitutional hypocrisy that he and so many others have.  The rule of law is a farce when an important part of the beloved Constitution is ignored.<br />
<br />
[Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through delusionaldemocracy.com.]</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-partisan-politics-and-political-platforms/">US Partisan Politics and Political Platforms</category>
			<dc:creator>statusquobuster</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-partisan-politics-and-political-platforms/80839-why-americans-elect-awful-presidents.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The perils of government by poll; 1930s edition.</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-blogs/80837-perils-government-poll-1930s-edition.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The Perils Of Government By Poll, 30s Edition - NYTimes.com (http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/the-perils-of-government-by-poll-30s-edition/) 
 
Is there anyone who (besides myself) who (for the lack of a better word) is saddened by this?  It never ceases to amaze me how such ancient...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/the-perils-of-government-by-poll-30s-edition/" target="_blank">The Perils Of Government By Poll, 30s Edition - NYTimes.com</a><br />
<br />
Is there anyone who (besides myself) who (for the lack of a better word) is saddened by this?  It never ceases to amaze me how such ancient thinking still persists in an era of open information.  None the less, the rate of stimulus spending has peaked all the while growth prospects seem to be moving in accordance to the spending pattern of the said stimulus.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-blogs/">*Breaking News* - Blogs</category>
			<dc:creator>Goldenboy219</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-blogs/80837-perils-government-poll-1930s-edition.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Obama to lay out new economic plan Wednesday</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80828-obama-lay-out-new-economic-plan-wednesday.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:43:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
With less than two months to go until a critical midterm election likely to turn on the economy, President Obama this week will lay out a new plan that includes a proposal to extend a tax cut popular with the business community, according to an administration official. 
---End Quote---...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			With less than two months to go until a critical midterm election likely to turn on the economy, President Obama this week will lay out a new plan that includes a proposal to extend a tax cut popular with the business community, according to an administration official.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> This recession has been rough, progress will be slow which I think a lot of Americans still don't realize.  I think a lot of people expected Obama to come in and with a flick of his finger drag us out of this recession.<br />
<br />
Would we have been better with McCain though? I am fairly certain he would have turned to tax cuts, although we have realized that isn't the answer. Maybe he would have but I doubt it.  I am sure the economy would still be slumping.  This isn't something that can be mended in 4 years.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/">*Breaking News* - Mainstream Media</category>
			<dc:creator>BCR</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80828-obama-lay-out-new-economic-plan-wednesday.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ex Military chief exposes two Labour PMs war failings</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/80826-ex-military-chief-exposes-two-labour-pms-war-failings.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:16:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote--- 
A former head of the Army has accused Tony Blair and Gordon Brown of letting down UK troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
 
Gen Sir Richard Dannatt criticised Mr Brown for inadequate funding and said Mr Blair lacked the "moral courage" to make his chancellor deliver money. 
 
--snip-- 
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			A former head of the Army has accused Tony Blair and Gordon Brown of letting down UK troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.<br />
<br />
Gen Sir Richard Dannatt criticised Mr Brown for inadequate funding and said Mr Blair lacked the &quot;moral courage&quot; to make his chancellor deliver money.<br />
<br />
--snip--<br />
<br />
He sparked a row when he acted as a defence adviser to the Conservatives after stepping down from the armed forces.<br />
<br />
But last month the former Army chief revealed he had quit the role when David Cameron became prime minister. <br />
<br />
--snip--<br />
<br />
The Sunday Telegraph reports that in his book,  Sir Richard said evidence for Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction - the justification for Britain's involvement in the 2003 invasion of the country - was &quot;most uncompelling&quot; and the planning for the aftermath of war an &quot;abject failure&quot;.<br />
<br />
And while the 1998 Strategic Defence Review (SDR) provided a &quot;good framework&quot; for defence policy in the Labour years, he said it was &quot;fatally flawed&quot; by being underfunded by Mr Brown's Treasury and could not cope with the strains of deploying troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan at the same time. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11190527" target="_blank">BBC News</a>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> This isolates Bair's position even further that his intelligence on Iraq was compelling, it also exposes further some of the leadership paralysis at the Labour Govt once Blair and Brown couldn't work together any further. Both these men let the armed forces down - Blair sent the troops on a false mission into Iraq while his chancellor refused to make sure the troops had sufficient equipment to do the job.<br />
<br />
And being the military - our people did the best they could and didn't complain.<br />
<br />
This also exposes Brown further in my eyes - he stood up and raided the pensions pot in 1998/99 for which we will all pay for years to come and then pretended that he had ensured the military had not been underfunded or sent in without proper equipment after this first came to light.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/">Europe</category>
			<dc:creator>Infinite Chaos</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/80826-ex-military-chief-exposes-two-labour-pms-war-failings.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Age of Consent Throughout the World</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/law-and-order/80822-age-consent-throughout-world.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:09:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Because the map is to large you have to visit the site:  
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Age_of_Consent.png 
  
The middle East is SICK BTW!!!!!!!!!</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font size="3">Because the map is to large you have to visit the site: </font><br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Age_of_Consent.png" target="_blank"><font size="3">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Age_of_Consent.png</font></a><br />
 <br />
The middle East is SICK BTW!!!!!!!!!</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/law-and-order/">Law and Order</category>
			<dc:creator>The Giant Noodle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/law-and-order/80822-age-consent-throughout-world.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Crisis. What Crisis? Profits Soar!</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/economics/80819-crisis-crisis-profits-soar.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The James Petras website (http://petras.lahaine.org/articulo.php?p=1818&more=1&c=1) 
 
*"While progressives and leftists write about the “crises of capitalism”, manufacturers, petroleum companies, bankers and most other major corporations on both sides of the Atlantic and Pacific coast are...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://petras.lahaine.org/articulo.php?p=1818&amp;more=1&amp;c=1" target="_blank">The James Petras website</a><br />
<br />
<font size="4"><b><font color="blue">&quot;While progressives and leftists write about the “crises of capitalism”, manufacturers, petroleum companies, bankers and most other major corporations on both sides of the Atlantic and Pacific coast are chuckling all the way to the bank.&quot;</font></b></font> <br />
<br />
<font color="blue"><b>08.14.2010 <br />
<br />
<br />
&quot;From the first quarter of this year, corporate profits have shot up between twenty to over a hundred percent, (Financial Times August 10, 2010, p. 7). In fact, corporate profits have risen higher than they were before the onset of the recession in 2008 (Money Morning March 31, 2010). Contrary to progressive bloggers the rates of profits are rising not falling, particularly among the biggest corporations (Consensus Economics, August 12, 2010). The buoyancy of corporate profits is directly a result of the deepening crises of the working class, public and private employees and small and medium size enterprises. With the onset of the recession, big capital shed millions of jobs (one out of four Americans has been unemployed in 2010), secured give backs from the trade union bosses, received tax exemptions, subsidies and virtually interest free loans from local, state and federal governments.<br />
<br />
As the recession temporarily bottomed out, big business doubled up production on the remaining labor force, intensifying exploitation (more output per worker) and lowered costs by passing onto the working class a much larger share of health insurance and pension benefits with the compliance of the millionaire trade union officials. The result is that while revenues declined, profits rose and balance sheets improved (Financial Times August 10, 2010). Paradoxically, the CEO’s used the pretext and rhetoric of “crises” coming from progressive journalists to keep workers from demanding a larger share of the burgeoning profits, aided by the ever growing pool of unemployed and underemployed workers as possible “replacements” (scabs) in the event of industrial action. The current boom of profits has not benefited all sectors of capitalism: the windfall has accrued overwhelmingly with the biggest corporations. In contrast many middle and small enterprises have suffered high rates of bankruptcy and losses, which has made them cheap and easy prey for buyouts for the ‘big fellows’ (Financial Times August 1, 2010). The crises of middle capital has led to the concentration and centralization of capital and has contributed to the rising rate of profits for the largest corporations.&quot;</b></font></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/economics/">Economics</category>
			<dc:creator>jmh423</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/economics/80819-crisis-crisis-profits-soar.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ramadan 2010 Scorecard</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/religion-and-philosophy/80818-ramadan-2010-scorecard.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*Ramadan as of Day 22 * 
 
 *_In the name of the Religion                         
of Peace  _*(Islam) 
   
Terror Attacks  172                    
  
Dead Bodies  816 
 
_*In the name of All</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><font size="4">Ramadan as of Day 22 </font></b><br />
<br />
 <b><u>In the name of the Religion                        <br />
of Peace  </u></b>(Islam)<br />
  <br />
Terror Attacks  172                   <br />
 <br />
Dead Bodies  816<br />
<br />
<u><b>In the name of All<br />
other Religions</b></u><br />
<br />
Terror Attacks  1<br />
<br />
Dead Bodies  1<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/" target="_blank">Islam: Making a True Difference in the World - One Body at a Time</a></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/religion-and-philosophy/"><![CDATA[Religion & Philosophy]]></category>
			<dc:creator>SgtRock</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/religion-and-philosophy/80818-ramadan-2010-scorecard.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>We made it!</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/off-topic-discussion/80804-we-made.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Through the summer heat! 
I woke up - the house was 60 - we're all wearing jackets and pants. :rofl We're so use to the heat the second it's gone * a little* we freeze! 
 
(we don't have AC in our house - 1/2 way through the summer I bought a small portable indoor AC unit that barely kept the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Through the summer heat!<br />
I woke up - the house was 60 - we're all wearing jackets and pants. :rofl We're so use to the heat the second it's gone * a little* we freeze!<br />
<br />
(we don't have AC in our house - 1/2 way through the summer I bought a small portable indoor AC unit that barely kept the living room at 94 when it was 110 outside. . . the average temp in the house during the entire summer (from May - August) was 85 - a few times it would dip down to 75 indoors overnight.<br />
<br />
We got a little use to it - 80/82 was reasonable indoor temp at which we could all do the usual around-the-house stuff without sweating.<br />
<br />
After a while I guess you just get use to it.<br />
<br />
But it did suck in the end - it got *hot* in July (over 98 and humid) and never really stopped beign *hot* . . . until this week.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/off-topic-discussion/">Off topic discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Aunt Spiker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/off-topic-discussion/80804-we-made.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Iran orders 99 lashes for woman facing execution, rights group says</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80803-iran-orders-99-lashes-woman-facing-execution-rights-group-says.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:56:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote--- 
*Iran orders 99 lashes for woman facing execution, rights group says* 
By the CNN Wire Staff 
September 5, 2010 
 
CNN) -- An Iranian woman who'd already been condemned to death faces another sentence of 99 lashes because of a case of mistaken identity in a photograph, according to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b>Iran orders 99 lashes for woman facing execution, rights group says</b><br />
By the CNN Wire Staff<br />
September 5, 2010<br />
<br />
CNN) -- An Iranian woman who'd already been condemned to death faces another sentence of 99 lashes because of a case of mistaken identity in a photograph, according to foes of the execution. Iranian authorities imposed the sentence after they saw the photo of a woman without a head scarf in a newspaper, the International Committee Against Stoning, a human rights group, said Friday.<br />
<br />
In an apology, The Times of London, which ran the photo on its front page on August 28, said the woman was wrongly identified as Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, who had previously been sentenced to death by stoning for adultery. The Times said the photo actually is of Susan Hejrat, a political activist living in Sweden.<br />
<br />
Ashtiani was sentenced to death by stoning after she was convicted of adultery. Iranian judicial authorities say a final verdict in her case has not yet been made, ISNA news agency reported recently. In July, Iran's judiciary said the case was under review. Ashtiani, who is being held in Tabriz, Iran, no longer has visitation rights, the family told CNN.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> Source: <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/09/04/iran.stoning/index.html?iref=NS1#fbid=LO8Q5-Eb3uC&amp;wom=false" target="_blank">CNN.com</a><br />
<br />
This barbarity goes from bad to worse. On a related note, for those who are following this case...<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			August 10, 2010<br />
<br />
Brazil has formalized its offer of asylum to Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, an Iranian woman convicted of adultery and sentenced to death by stoning, Brazilian state-run media said Tuesday. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had made a previous offer for asylum, raising Ashtiani's hopes for survival. Brazil's ambassador in Tehran has now officially made the offer at Iran's foreign ministry, according to the state-run news service Agencia Brasil.<br />
<br />
On Saturday, Lula addressed the matter in Bogota, Colombia, where he said he had asked Amorim to ask the Brazilian ambassador in Tehran to talk to Iranian authorities about it. &quot;I can't imagine someone being stoned,&quot; Lula said. &quot;I can't imagine. That's why I made the request. If there was condition to send her to Brazil, we would receive her with arms wide open.&quot; <br />
<br />
Ashtiani has said she was &quot;grateful&quot; for Brazil's offer and would &quot;graciously&quot; accept, according to a statement from her son, Sajjad Ashtiani, who has visited his mother in a Tabriz prison. Iran rejected a previous, informal offer, saying Lula lacked sufficient information about the case.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> Source: <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/08/10/brazil.stoning.asylum/index.html?iref=obinsite#fbid=LO8Q5-Eb3uC&amp;wom=false" target="_blank">CNN.com</a></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/">*Breaking News* - Mainstream Media</category>
			<dc:creator>Tashah</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/80803-iran-orders-99-lashes-woman-facing-execution-rights-group-says.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Palestinian leader blasts Ahmadinejad</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/middle-east/80801-palestinian-leader-blasts-ahmadinejad.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
*Palestinian leader blasts Ahmadinejad over Mideast peace comments* 
By the CNN Wire Staff 
September 5, 2010  
 
(CNN) -- The administration of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas lashed out at Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Saturday, a day after Ahmadinejad...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b>Palestinian leader blasts Ahmadinejad over Mideast peace comments</b><br />
By the CNN Wire Staff<br />
September 5, 2010 <br />
<br />
(CNN) -- The administration of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas lashed out at Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Saturday, a day after Ahmadinejad criticized Abbas for renewing direct peace talks with Israel. <br />
<br />
&quot;He who does not represent the Iranian people, who forged elections and who suppresses the Iranian people and stole the authority, is not entitled to talk about Palestine, or the President of Palestine,&quot; said Nabil Abu Rudeineh, a spokesman for the Palestinian Authority, according to Wafa, the Palestinian Authority's news agency.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/09/04/west.bank.abbas.ahmadinejad/?hpt=T2#fbid=LO8Q5-Eb3uC&amp;wom=true" target="_blank">CNN.com</a><br />
<br />
The PA certainly didn't mince any words here. It's about time they told Ahmadinejad to butt out.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/middle-east/">Middle East</category>
			<dc:creator>Tashah</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/middle-east/80801-palestinian-leader-blasts-ahmadinejad.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hypothetical scenario</title>
			<link>http://www.debatepolitics.com/abortion/80800-hypothetical-scenario.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Let's say that for whatever you find yourself in a situation where you have a choice to make.   
 
You have an opportunity to do one of the following: 
 
1.  Stop a woman who is 5 months pregnant from having an abortion.  If you choose this option, she will not have an abortion at a later date, and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Let's say that for whatever you find yourself in a situation where you have a choice to make.  <br />
<br />
You have an opportunity to do one of the following:<br />
<br />
1.  Stop a woman who is 5 months pregnant from having an abortion.  If you choose this option, she will not have an abortion at a later date, and nature will take its course in terms of the development of the fetus.<br />
<br />
2.  Stop the mother of a month-old infant from killing it.  If you choose this option, she will not later kill the child, and nature will take its course in terms of the child's development.<br />
<br />
The whys and hows don't really matter, only the outcome.  For whatever reason, choosing both outcomes is not an option.  You must choose one or the other (or neither).  Feel free to expound on why you chose what you did.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.debatepolitics.com/abortion/">Abortion</category>
			<dc:creator>molten_dragon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.debatepolitics.com/abortion/80800-hypothetical-scenario.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
