- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 3,082
- Reaction score
- 744
- Location
- New Orleans
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
As well he should have. You never had parents?
Nope. never.
As well he should have. You never had parents?
You needn't be part of a religious group to avoid mainstream society. And of course "not all Muslims are terrorists" as we hear daily but not all Muslims aren't terrorists either. But there is also the matter of domestic terrorism in the Muslim home. In Europe and North America wherever more Muslims arrive there are more Muslim women seeking shelter. The response from the men is typical.
Islam in Europe: Drammen: Women in shelters are to blame
In Europe, Muslim Women Face Multiple Issues : NPR
Perhaps you've worn a sack over your head to work, or beachwear to your favorite fondue restaurant or a police or fireman's costume to do your grocery shopping but most people know how to dress appropriate to the occasion, the places they are visiting, and the culture in which they live. There is a connection between dress, manners, behavior that connect all cultures with each other and in fact all peoples of the world with each other. Good manners, for example, are just as important in Athens or Tokyo as they are in Nairobi or Buenos Aires.
And I'd be all for that BUT! we don't know, in a patriarchal culture, how many women are being abused because they are at great risk if they do try and defend themselves or express any independence. That is written right there in the Koran about beating wives and those laws certainly dates further back that the body burka, which is a rather recent phenomenon. You only have to read the writings of Muslim women to understand the difficulties and hardships many Muslim women face, and the courage it takes simply to go to a woman's shelter.
I agree that many women will be forced by their husbands to stay home, which simply reinforces the idea that these women are not having a free choice in what they might want to wear. "Beneath The Veil", if you've ever seen it, shows the lengths many women have to go to to safely apply lipstick on their mouths or polish on their fingernails, if only for a little while. They risk a public beating of they are caught. Forcing women to wear great swathes of cloth over the heads and bodies, despite the weather, is just not right.
Sure you can. But would you if you didn't have to? There have been many cases of young Muslims girls being murdered by their fathers for becoming too"western" and not wearing a burka. Just Google and you'll find many dozens of such cases. Banning the burka frees these younger Muslim girls and women from the threat of death from their fathers and brothers.
Yes, indeed. But many Muslim women aren't being given this choice,
No, it won't initially but it will eventually. Muslims have to enter the mainstream and dressing their women in shrouds will not encourage that.
Are you suggesting the fines should be higher? I don't think this law is directed to Middle Eastern sheiks anyway, but instead to Muslim families living in France.
You're saying the same thing I am, that the men have all the power and the women have none. I want that to change.
Im not sure I agree with that line re 'the state' not having the 'right' to interfere. Perhaps in your country, or perhaps in your vision of what 'a' state...any government...should be allowed to do. But...well...this is France we are talking about and they as a 'state' have decided they most definitely do have the right. Just as fundamentalist Islamic countries execute and enforce certain rights.
Of course it's my "vision". Whose vision should I be defending other than my own on a debate board?In my opinion, no government should interfere in the lives of people who are no threat to society whatsoever.
Arcana XV;1059416141 In my opinion said:and that is why the French government is limiting itself to those who do, here.
and that is why the French government is limiting itself to those who do, here.
Banning the burka won't change any of that. If being free and liberated was enough to protect us from domestic violence, there would be no need for those shelters at all. Muslim women are far from the only ones who make us of them.
Of course it's my "vision". Whose vision should I be defending other than my own on a debate board?In my opinion, no government should interfere in the lives of people who are no threat to society whatsoever.
Right. All women are victims so why bother with Muslim women.
Actually I've come to the same conclusion as you. I'll leave it up to Muslims, and of course the Amish, to worry about their women.
There is a concern, apparently well justified through statistics and oter evidence, that there is a domestic danger to those women who don't wear the burka. The beatings and murders rather suggest this, but of course women are being beaten and murdered everywhere. Especially among the Amish.
That's ridiculous and you know it. A piece of fabric is not a weapon. Do keep some perspective. If the French government really wants to do some good, I suggest they start cleaning up the "cités" they're too scared to set foot in. It's unconscionable to scapegoat 2000 defenseless women, when the real problems are much greater.
It is not ridiculous to expect that those living in your country should become French.
Placating a fifth column living among you is foolish, as it DOES represent a danger to France to have growing legions of backwards fundamentalists living amoing you who want nothing from France but to undermine your liberal values and replace them with their primitive culture.
I'll tell you what, Gard. Let's meet up in about 30 years or so when your apocalyptic vision becomes a reality and you can laugh in my face and say "I told you so." :lol:
By the way, your scenario is just as likely to happen with or without this ban.
I have apocalyptic visions? Cool!
I do like your vision of me being among the living in 30 years, though.
I'll be the one in the racy lingerie under my midnight blue silk burka.![]()
and I imagine you will still be hot at 70.
and I imagine you will still be hot at 70.
and I imagine you will still be hot at 70.
Grant, I'm sure you're very frustrated with this whole discussion, but the fact remains that, despite your very good intentions, this ban will not bring the results you so hope for. Surely, you realize this if you're to be truly honest with yourself. Or maybe I'm just way more cynical about humanity than you are. I don't see any good coming from this ban. This is what I predict will happen, knowing what I know about this particular community in France:
I am sincere, and I think everyone should be concerned about the plight of many Muslim women, Honestly, I just don't get the indifference. While you claim the ban will not get results, what have you in mind? Social workers visiting homes where the women are being abused? Who is going tell them? And the burkas, as any women working in the hostels can tell you, are often covering the bruises. When I get specific to Muslim women you, and others, bring up Amish women, there is violence against all women, it's racist to comment, I haven't spoken to enough Muslims, many women want to wear it, etc., none of which relates to the problem at hand and neither are alternatives being offered.
The women who wear it out of cultural habit will not understand why they have to remove it and may even be deeply offended at the idea.
It does not matter if they are offended. They should be educated and informed of the bigger problem.
Those who are forced to wear it will not be allowed out of the house and may face even more abuse if they try to use the law in their favor.
Then you know that women are being forced to wear the burka and it has nothing to do with the Amish. When women are not allowed out of their homes there will be a chance the neighbours will complain and then the social workers can visit to see what's going on. But they can't visit all those homes unless there is evidence, and the burkas frequently hide the evidence.
These two groups constitute the majority of full veil wearers.
Those who wear it by choice (generally a minority of recent converts) will either reluctantly comply and remove the veil covering their face or they'll continue to wear it as a form of protest. Some have even been making noises about switching from wearing hijab to wearing a full veil in support of those who wear it by choice.
Then the law must step in again. All Muslims are not rich princes.
Is this really what the supporters of this ban want?
Supporters of the ban want liberty, equality and fraternity, as well as to ensure the public safety. None of these ambitions will be realized if women, willingly or otherwise, cover their heads and bodies in burkas, a religious and political statement which has only become in fashion quite recently.
Wife Abuse in the Muslim Community :: Islam the Eternal Path to Peace :: Jannah.Org
Abuse and Germany's Muslim women - World news - Islam in Europe - msnbc.com
Who Will Speak Up For The Muslim Women In Europe? - The Muslim Woman
The Redhunter: "The Steady Erosion of Women's Rights in Egypt"
It is not ridiculous to expect that those living in your country should become French.
I am sincere, and I think everyone should be concerned about the plight of many Muslim women, Honestly, I just don't get the indifference. While you claim the ban will not get results, what have you in mind? Social workers visiting homes where the women are being abused? Who is going tell them? And the burkas, as any women working in the hostels can tell you, are often covering the bruises. When I get specific to Muslim women you, and others, bring up Amish women, there is violence against all women, it's racist to comment, I haven't spoken to enough Muslims, many women want to wear it, etc., none of which relates to the problem at hand and neither are alternatives being offered.
It does not matter if they are offended. They should be educated and informed of the bigger problem.
Then you know that women are being forced to wear the burka and it has nothing to do with the Amish. When women are not allowed out of their homes there will be a chance the neighbours will complain and then the social workers can visit to see what's going on. But they can't visit all those homes unless there is evidence, and the burkas frequently hide the evidence.
Then the law must step in again. All Muslims are not rich princes.
Supporters of the ban want liberty, equality and fraternity, as well as to ensure the public safety. None of these ambitions will be realized if women, willingly or otherwise, cover their heads and bodies in burkas, a religious and political statement which has only become in fashion quite recently.
Wife Abuse in the Muslim Community :: Islam the Eternal Path to Peace :: Jannah.Org
Abuse and Germany's Muslim women - World news - Islam in Europe - msnbc.com
Who Will Speak Up For The Muslim Women In Europe? - The Muslim Woman
The Redhunter: "The Steady Erosion of Women's Rights in Egypt"
Aren't you?
*sigh*
Grant, you and I have been around this argument countless times before. You know where I stand on this issue and you're still missing the point. No one is more aware of the evils of domestic violence than I am, regardless of the religion of the perpetrators. There is no need to bombard me with links.
There is nothing you can say that will make me change my conviction that this ban is misguided, targets the wrong people, unduly invades the privacy of individuals and will have none of the intended effects, but will bring about a whole bunch of unintended consequences instead.
I say we agree to disagree and leave it at that.![]()
*sigh*
Grant, you and I have been around this argument countless times before. You know where I stand on this issue and you're still missing the point. No one is more aware of the evils of domestic violence than I am, regardless of the religion of the perpetrators. There is no need to bombard me with links.
There is nothing you can say that will make me change my conviction that this ban is misguided, targets the wrong people, unduly invades the privacy of individuals and will have none of the intended effects, but will bring about a whole bunch of unintended consequences instead.
I say we agree to disagree and leave it at that.![]()