• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sweden II. More than "200 Islamists prone to violence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
And there are riots after the Lakers win the Championship...
Click to expand...

I have no idea who the Lakers are or what Championships you're talking about. Though I make a guess that any rioters there aren't doing it for the cause of religious enlightenment.


It is a indirect name calling in the whiney tone that you mimicked Leftists as using
Click to expand...

I repeat, who did I call a name, indirectly or otherwise? If anything, such names are overused by the Liberal-Leftists to the point of tokenism, hence the satire of the mimicry.



It is all interconnected, and to dismiss that it is remain willfully ignorant...
Click to expand...

No, to make the connection between cartoon riots and the Middle East is grasping at straws. And I can't be bothered with being threadbanned for talking about it in the wrong section.
 
Bodhisattva said:
It is all interconnected, and to dismiss that it is remain willfully ignorant... if it is interconnected, then how is it off-topic?
Click to expand...
Well you're going to have to make a better connection than that EXCUSE.
It's also "interconnected" with the Koran and overpopulation in Muslim countries.
BUT.. this string is on Muslims in Sweden .. or at least Europe or Scandinavia. Or somewhere.
Muslims in the "imperialist" USA are doing just fine. But that's ANOTHER topic.

The fact is this is just more aimless anger because yet another poster cannot handle Blaming anyone but America (or Zionism no less!!).
Post ON TOPIC please.
 
Last edited:
Republic_Of_Public said:
I have no idea who the Lakers are or what Championships you're talking about. Though I make a guess that any rioters there aren't doing it for the cause of religious enlightenment.
Click to expand...

That is the point, that violent people do violent things, and that religion or basketball championships are just excuses.

I repeat, who did I call a name, indirectly or otherwise? If anything, such names are overused by the Liberal-Leftists to the point of tokenism, hence the satire of the mimicry.
Click to expand...

Oh lordie...

mim·ic   /ˈmɪmɪk/ Show Spelled
[mim-ik] Show IPA
verb, -icked, -ick·ing, noun, adjective
–verb (used with object)
1. to imitate or copy in action, speech, etc., often playfully or derisively.
2. to imitate in a servile or unthinking way; ape.
3. to be an imitation of; simulate; resemble closely

Mimic | Define Mimic at Dictionary.com

In doing it in an obviously negative manner, you are being insultive. Using the words name calling was not acurate, but being insultive is...

No, to make the connection between cartoon riots and the Middle East is grasping at straws. And I can't be bothered with being threadbanned for talking about it in the wrong section.
Click to expand...

Who is making that connection?
 
....nd that religion or basketball championships are just excuses.
Click to expand...

As are drivellings about Islamic extremists (not just bombers) feeling 'islolated' in society, feeling 'disaffected' and other cobblers given as just reasoning. But we still have to listen to it every time there's trouble.



Using the words name calling was not acurate, but being insultive is...
Click to expand...

Are you feeling insulted at mimicry of words I've been called all the time? I'll have to go and have a cry now.


Who is making that connection?
Click to expand...

You are. I was talking about trouble in European cities and you started banging on about rape and illegal occupation.
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
As are drivellings about Islamic extremists (not just bombers) feeling 'islolated' in society, feeling 'disaffected' and other cobblers given as just reasoning. But we still have to listen to it every time there's trouble.
Click to expand...

You don't have to listen...

Are you feeling insulted at mimicry of words I've been called all the time? I'll have to go and have a cry now.
Click to expand...

You should cry because you sound pathetic... I don't give two ****s about you or what you think.

You are. I was talking about trouble in European cities and you started banging on about rape and illegal occupation.
Click to expand...

You're a little slow, I can see that... Trouble in European cities is not specifically the cartoon issue, that is what you said I was making a connection about and it isn't.
 
Bodhisattva said:
Although it is not stated, most of the immigrant perpetrators are Muslims.

Most. Most? Most are probably boys too...
Click to expand...

Most of them also choose to wear pants therefore, the ideology of pants-wwearing is a grave threat to western civilization. We should kill this Levi Straus character.
 
You don't have to listen...
Click to expand...

Ah great, I'm given a choice now!



You should cry because you sound pathetic...
Click to expand...

You're a little slow, I can see that...
Click to expand...

Oooh, that's name calling! Insultive, one could almost say! Certainly beats Wacist and Iswamophobe in the bile catagory!




I don't give two ****s about you or what you think.
Click to expand...

Then why have we spent the last half-hour arguing the toss?




Trouble in European cities is not specifically the cartoon issue, that is what you said I was making a connection about and it isn't.
Click to expand...

Alright, let's start again. Concentrate this time and tell me what you're talking about in something other than disjointed abstracts.
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
Ah great, I'm given a choice now!
Click to expand...

You always have a choice... just figuring that out now?

Oooh, that's name calling! Insultive, one could almost say!
Click to expand...

It is. I am being a man and being direct about it while you are snivelling about it and arguing...

Then why have we spent the last half-hour arguing the toss?
Click to expand...

Toss?

Alight, let's start again. Concentrate this time and tell me what you're talking about in something other than disjointed abstracts.
Click to expand...

Abstracts are not always disjointed... and I have been perfectly clear. Perhaps if you concentrated you would have followed it the first time.
 
Tucker Case said:
Most of them also choose to wear pants therefore, the ideology of pants-wwearing is a grave threat to western civilization. We should kill this Levi Straus character.
Click to expand...

But pants don't commit actions, whereas boys do. ;)
 
You always have a choice...
Click to expand...

The ones I make often results in the 'punishment' of being called names for thinking the 'wrong' thing! But that's the grown-ups in the liberal-left for you.



I am being a man and being direct about it
Click to expand...

Not very manly to whine about me supposedly calling names before suddenly feeling all macho when you want to do it to me. But that's the grown-ups in the liberal-left again!


Perhaps if you concentrated you would have followed it the first time.
Click to expand...

Not if it was disjointed I couldn't. You were told by somebody else earlier.

Now as I say, tell me in an unbroken line of logic what you're on about. Then we may get somewhere.
 
Jetboogieman said:
A: Pat Condell is a ****ing idiot.

B: 200 islamists prone to violence? Oh well. There are probably more pure bread aryan white swedes prone to violence then that.

How about there are just people prone to violence? And we deal with them... Muslim or not.
Click to expand...

You know, that's a nice dhimmi thing to say, because the reality is that the killing has been pretty damn lopsided for quite awhile now....

Either way, I have nothing but condemnation for any group or religion that plans, stalks and carries out the murder of innocents.
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
The ones I make often results in the 'punishment' of being called names for thinking the 'wrong' thing! But that's the grown-ups in the liberal-left for you.
Click to expand...

There is that over-generalization again.... that all you got?

Not very manly to whine about me supposedly calling names before suddenly feeling all macho when you want to do it to me. But that's the grown-ups in the liberal-left again!
Click to expand...

I am neither liberal nor left leaning... wanna try again? Also, I was calling you on your pathetic **** before, not whining about it. Weak.

Not if it was disjointed I couldn't. You were told by somebody else earlier.
Click to expand...

Since it wasn't disjointed, and you can't even attempt to show how it is... I'll leave this knowing quite well that the reading comprehension issue is yours.
 
that all you got?
Click to expand...

No, I've been smeared and insulted a lot by the opposition.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...up-against-islamophobia-3.html#post1058733739

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...argeting-europe-foiled-14.html#post1059017767 , etc.



I am neither liberal nor left leaning...
Click to expand...

You seem to make a passable impression from where I'm standing.



Also, I was calling you on your pathetic **** before
Click to expand...

That's only your view which cannot be passed off as fact.

Since it wasn't disjointed, and you can't even attempt to show how it is...
Click to expand...

I was talking about Islamic rioters (cartoons, etc.) and you started talking about troops and 'Zionist policies'.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...slamists-prone-violence-4.html#post1059190642
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
No, I've been smeared and insulted a lot by the opposition.
Click to expand...

It comes with the territory. Criticism of Islamist totalitarianism results in personal attacks. I just received a doozy in another thread, myself.
 
Jetboogieman said:
My thing is, and always will be standing against the idea that a poisonous minority within Islam, makes guilty the law abiding, decent muslims that I deal with every day.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that not all Muslims are terrorists?

What a remarkable insight!
 
mbig said:
Once again, the attempted marginalization/PC to '.01% terriorists' etc. "200 prone to violence."
"200 muslims" is hardly the Only problem in Sweden.
Click to expand...
just "200 prone to violence".
Yes, even while some try to call Muslims "the New Jews of Europe" (!!!), Muslims are still bashing the old (and still) Jews of Europe; Jews.
Click to expand...
Yup, it's only the "200" that the problem. "Xenophobia", "Hate"

Muslim refugees and the cost of Sweden's kindness
Click to expand...
-
Click to expand...

This thread deliberately takes the title of the thread recently closed - a thread which pointed out that Säpo, the Swedish intelligence agency (not a newspaper or a hate website) had assessed the risks posed and that it amounts to 200 or so high risk suspects.

This means people who are highly likely to cause terrorist attacks. Most people would recognise there is a difference between street violence and bombing type terror attacks. Which leads me to suspect the agenda yet again of those who started and thanked the attacking posts in this thread. My original thread was about terrorist attacks - not anti-semitism in the street. I support neither muslim terrorist plots or attacks in Europe nor muslim anti-semites.

I see no purpose to this thread beyond baiting those who have found themselves defending the innocent majority of the muslim population of Sweden. Besides - SOURCE

A report released Wednesday by Sweden's intelligence agency Säpo suggested this kind of extremism was very are: it estimated only about 200 extremists with the potential for violence among the Muslim population.

On that evidence, Hjärpe insisted, they "do not represent the huge majority of the Muslims in Sweden."

Even the audio message attributed to the bomber, sent out shortly before Saturday's attack, appeared to acknowledge this lack of radicalism, said Hjärpe.

"You could hear he was quite angry that the Muslims in Sweden were not interested in going into a jihad," he pointed out.
Click to expand...
 
Moderator's Warning:
Since you all cannot play nice, this thread is closed. This is a benefit to several of you who should be getting infractions. Further, if you think a post is baiting or flaming, do not bitch about that inthread but use the report post button.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom