• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Labour: LOVE Paedophiles, HATE 4mph Toy Car Drivers!

Republic_Of_Public

Republic_Of_Public

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
2,922
Reaction score
343
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
It's as if those creatures in the Left have got nobody better to legislate in favour of:

Paedophile who abducted underage girls for sex wins deportation appeal to stay in UK | Mail Online



Meanwhile, the state clamps down hard on a man driving his daughter's toy car:

Father banned from driving after getting behind the wheel of a toy Barbie car while drunk | Mail Online

(Alright he was a bit merry so the cops pulled him up, but for God's bloody sake! At least he had the presence of mind not to be dangerously driving his own car 500 yards. The lack of joined-up government and common sense is appalling.)



Paedophiles getting a cushy ride under Labour is no new thing, with even judges complaining about the laxity - amazing indeed when you consider they are usually employed by the PC Home Office for that said laxity:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/70523-left-wing-scum-force-judge-let-off-sex-beast.html


But with so many paedophiles and their sympathisers infesting Labour, can we expect any less?

(2009) LABOUR FIGURES’ BIZARRE LINK TO PAEDOPHILE GROUPS Enemies of the People





No wonder that even the Lib Dems and the BNP can make hay while the sun shines whilst the New Labour Utopia crashes in the ruins it always was.

LIB DEMS ENJOY RARE BIT OF SUNSHINE: General Election 2010: Nick Clegg dismisses Tory attack after Lib Dem poll triumph | Mail Online

Cameron less popular than Nick Griffin?

The Sun actually called the Lib Dems more dangerous than the BNP once, not least for their penchant to surrender even more remaining shards of sovereignty to the EU, ramp up taxes more mecilessly and apparently even wanting to legalise much paedophile sex by bringing the age of consent down.



REMEMBER THESE PEOPLE AND DO LOOK BACK IN ANGER ON MAY 6!
 
Last edited:
Republic_Of_Public said:
The Sun actually called the Lib Dems more dangerous than the BNP once, not least for their penchant to surrender even more remaining shards of sovereignty to the EU, ramp up taxes more mecilessly and apparently even wanting to legalise much paedophile sex by bringing the age of consent down.
Click to expand...

Looks like you're getting all trembly about the LibDems like your Tory buddies, RoP.

Especially the bit about lowering the age of consent. S'funny, you're all for sending kids to prison...

Anti-bullying thread, Post 14 "I'm not saying you should chuck kids in at the deep end at their first few offences. But the spiral of crime can grow and the further you go with the worst ones the more you see a need to lock them away."

...but you want them to wait until they're 18 before having sex. Here's a teaser, what do you think will happen to them the second they get into prison? Just asking.
 
I don't think the kind of thugs I was referring to would stand for being molested by 'Hairy Fingers Dave', the terror of the showers, for one minute.

If anything they'd probably be the ones doing it, if not actually being 'humbled' by the experience!
 
Last edited:
Public Opinion doesn't matter either:


General Election 2010: Gordon Brown risks alienating working class over immigration | Mail Online

So he's not just a liar but also arrogantly condescending and dismissive of Public Opinion!

He fits the Labour leadership like a glove!




Interesting comments:

I heard the phrase below a while back and think it kind of sums up the predicament our country faces:

"Great Britain, the only country which imports people and exports jobs"

Nuff said.

Thanks NuLabour "experiment"

- Bob, Mercia, 19/4/2010 13:22


There are more and more immigrants but no more social housing, jobs, school places or hospital beds.

Enough is enough. Stop immigration and start repatriating people who shouldn't be here. [The likes of those who came here via The Jungle in Calais, I take it.]

- Ah Hem, England, 19/4/2010 13:21



LABOUR HAVE FORM ON NATION-MORPHING IMMIGRATION, having the temerity to slander people as racist for voicing concern: http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/65404-lunatics-new-labour-state.html
 
Last edited:
Republic_Of_Public said:
It's as if those creatures in the Left have got nobody better to legislate in favour of:

Paedophile who abducted underage girls for sex wins deportation appeal to stay in UK | Mail Online



Meanwhile, the state clamps down hard on a man driving his daughter's toy car:

Father banned from driving after getting behind the wheel of a toy Barbie car while drunk | Mail Online

(Alright he was a bit merry so the cops pulled him up, but for God's bloody sake! At least he had the presence of mind not to be dangerously driving his own car 500 yards. The lack of joined-up government and common sense is appalling.)



Paedophiles getting a cushy ride under Labour is no new thing, with even judges complaining about the laxity - amazing indeed when you consider they are usually employed by the PC Home Office for that said laxity:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/70523-left-wing-scum-force-judge-let-off-sex-beast.html


But with so many paedophiles and their sympathisers infesting Labour, can we expect any less?

(2009) LABOUR FIGURES’ BIZARRE LINK TO PAEDOPHILE GROUPS Enemies of the People





No wonder that even the Lib Dems and the BNP can make hay while the sun shines whilst the New Labour Utopia crashes in the ruins it always was.

LIB DEMS ENJOY RARE BIT OF SUNSHINE: General Election 2010: Nick Clegg dismisses Tory attack after Lib Dem poll triumph | Mail Online

Cameron less popular than Nick Griffin?

The Sun actually called the Lib Dems more dangerous than the BNP once, not least for their penchant to surrender even more remaining shards of sovereignty to the EU, ramp up taxes more mecilessly and apparently even wanting to legalise much paedophile sex by bringing the age of consent down.



REMEMBER THESE PEOPLE AND DO LOOK BACK IN ANGER ON MAY 6!
Click to expand...

Those poor Brits. In America we would have shot the pedophile without trial and the drunk dad after his trial.
 
Ikari said:
Those poor Brits. In America we would have shot the pedophile without trial and the drunk dad after his trial.
Click to expand...

Not quite.

In America, the pedo would've gotten more than 15 years. The drunk would never be allowed to drive again.
 
Vader said:
Not quite.

In America, the pedo would've gotten more than 15 years. The drunk would never be allowed to drive again.
Click to expand...

Hell, they tried to give me a DUI for sitting in my truck with the heat one while waiting for a cab to come get me. It was 15 friggin degrees outside and in Alaska, the cabs aren't exactly fast getting there. The cab pulled up as he was giving me a road side test where I was required to stand on one leg on ice.

I can't imagine what would have happened if the DUI had stuck. I hear it's a bitch.
 
jallman said:
Hell, they tried to give me a DUI for sitting in my truck with the heat one while waiting for a cab to come get me. It was 15 friggin degrees outside and in Alaska, the cabs aren't exactly fast getting there. The cab pulled up as he was giving me a road side test where I was required to stand on one leg on ice.

I can't imagine what would have happened if the DUI had stuck. I hear it's a bitch.
Click to expand...

The cop who did that needs to lose his badge.
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
The Sun actually called the Lib Dems more dangerous than the BNP once, not least for their penchant to surrender even more remaining shards of sovereignty to the EU, ramp up taxes more mecilessly and apparently even wanting to legalise much paedophile sex by bringing the age of consent down.
Click to expand...

Andalublue said:
Looks like you're getting all trembly about the LibDems like your Tory buddies, RoP.
Click to expand...

Was just thinking the same thing.

Labour and Tories should be worried. I hope Liberal Democrats gain enough seats to hold the balance of power
 
jallman said:
Hell, they tried to give me a DUI for sitting in my truck with the heat one while waiting for a cab to come get me. It was 15 friggin degrees outside and in Alaska, the cabs aren't exactly fast getting there. The cab pulled up as he was giving me a road side test where I was required to stand on one leg on ice.

I can't imagine what would have happened if the DUI had stuck. I hear it's a bitch.
Click to expand...

No, it's quite common and I'm surprised that you got away with it. It usually doesn't matter, they can give you a DUI if you are in your car and drunk. Even if you have friends coming. I've known a few people who got DUIs that way. It's because the DUI is demonized in order to excuse these sorts of draconian methods against our own people so that the government can take more of our money. In the end, that's what it's all about; not safety, not some public service or good, but extorting more money out of us. The DUI laws are ridiculous, but they'll always be ready with some sob story if someone dare questions them on it. It's a money making scam and nothing more.
 
A poster who calls himself RoP
Who's far to the right of the GOP
Thinks all adults paedos
If they roll in the meadows
And count all the cherries they pop:cool:
 
Ikari said:
No, it's quite common and I'm surprised that you got away with it. It usually doesn't matter, they can give you a DUI if you are in your car and drunk.
Click to expand...

I didn't completely get away with it. I went down to a lesser charge, paid a fine, and had to go to some class where they acted as if I was an alcoholic for 12 hours (3 four hour sessions).

I told the DA, outright, that if he was going to try to make the DUI stick that I was prepared with phone records of my call to the cab, the cab driver's sworn affadavit that he came to pick me up and was turned away by the cop, and the weather report for that night that said it was 15 degrees. Also, the owner of Chilkoot's (the bar where I was) was prepared to come and state that he had to alter his 2AM policy of kicking everyone out the doors immediately during winter hours because he felt he was to blame for my DUI. (He happened to be one of my clients at the company I worked for there).

The DA, I guess, didn't want a trial and that's where it was headed. After some discussion with the judge, they came back with an offer that avoided the DUI and losing my license, got the fine cut down to less than $500.00, and avoided the jail time. Also, the city released my truck to me with no charges. They could have kept it impounded for 90 days otherwise.
 
jallman said:
I didn't completely get away with it. I went down to a lesser charge, paid a fine, and had to go to some class where they acted as if I was an alcoholic for 12 hours (3 four hour sessions).

I told the DA, outright, that if he was going to try to make the DUI stick that I was prepared with phone records of my call to the cab, the cab driver's sworn affadavit that he came to pick me up and was turned away by the cop, and the weather report for that night that said it was 15 degrees. Also, the owner of Chilkoot's (the bar where I was) was prepared to come and state that he had to alter his 2AM policy of kicking everyone out the doors immediately during winter hours because he felt he was to blame for my DUI. (He happened to be one of my clients at the company I worked for there).

The DA, I guess, didn't want a trial and that's where it was headed. After some discussion with the judge, they came back with an offer that avoided the DUI and losing my license, got the fine cut down to less than $500.00, and avoided the jail time. Also, the city released my truck to me with no charges. They could have kept it impounded for 90 days otherwise.
Click to expand...

So what was it, like DWAI or something like that?

And you know what, it's all bull****. It's now on your record, you're in the system for NOT having committed a crime. How insane is that? But don't raise your voice too much about it otherwise you're supporting people who drive and kill people while drunk. It's ridiculous. They got what they wanted, they got money out of you, they have you databased in the system now; that's what they wanted.
 
Ikari said:
So what was it, like DWAI or something like that?

And you know what, it's all bull****. It's now on your record, you're in the system for NOT having committed a crime. How insane is that? But don't raise your voice too much about it otherwise you're supporting people who drive and kill people while drunk. It's ridiculous. They got what they wanted, they got money out of you, they have you databased in the system now; that's what they wanted.
Click to expand...

No, it was reckless endangerment or something like that. It cost me 8 points on my license but stopped just shy of suspending it. In retrospect, I should have just fought the DUI in front of a jury of 6 and taken my chances.

The whole deal still cost me close to $7000 if you count the increased insurance for 5 years.
 
Have I missed something ?
Surely driving an electric kiddies car down the road while under the influence is not worth a proper driving ban.
A three year ban for driving kiddy cars maybe:doh

As far as the paedophile is concerned..I suspect the English public school tradition of the prefects shagging the new boys may have something to do with the British judiciary's tolerance of paedophiles
 
jallman said:
No, it was reckless endangerment or something like that. It cost me 8 points on my license but stopped just shy of suspending it. In retrospect, I should have just fought the DUI in front of a jury of 6 and taken my chances.

The whole deal still cost me close to $7000 if you count the increased insurance for 5 years.
Click to expand...

Yup, see they still got the money out of you in the end. Though it's better to not have the DUI on your record. But still, point is how the **** did you even recklessly endanger anyone? This is the BS crap that's been going on in our government for FAR too long. People want to think "drunk drivers are evil and blah blah blah, throw the book at them!" But this is the result of it. Innocent people get caught up, people who may be driving ok are getting caught up. Surely you can't let drunk driving be legal; but we've allowed ourselves to become so rabid about it that we've lost all sense. Now even fighting the DUI costs a lot of money and they can just issue one without you actually drunk driving. There's an operable word in there...it's driving! You can't drunk drive without driving (well or being drunk). I think if you are driving drunk, fine. But you can't be taken in for just being in your car; but they'll get you. Even if you're sleeping in the back...BOOM DUI. And then all the checkpoints, those are bull**** things too! At this point, I'd rather live with the drunk driving than the government enforcing the law.
 
Ikari said:
Yup, see they still got the money out of you in the end. Though it's better to not have the DUI on your record. But still, point is how the **** did you even recklessly endanger anyone? This is the BS crap that's been going on in our government for FAR too long. People want to think "drunk drivers are evil and blah blah blah, throw the book at them!" But this is the result of it. Innocent people get caught up, people who may be driving ok are getting caught up. Surely you can't let drunk driving be legal; but we've allowed ourselves to become so rabid about it that we've lost all sense. Now even fighting the DUI costs a lot of money and they can just issue one without you actually drunk driving. There's an operable word in there...it's driving! You can't drunk drive without driving (well or being drunk). I think if you are driving drunk, fine. But you can't be taken in for just being in your car; but they'll get you. Even if you're sleeping in the back...BOOM DUI. And then all the checkpoints, those are bull**** things too! At this point, I'd rather live with the drunk driving than the government enforcing the law.
Click to expand...

A lot of it has to do with MADD. You get a group of hysterical mothers who've lost their baby to a drunk driver in front of congress and who's gonna tell them "no"? It's political suicide to tell mommies that their babies' deaths were tragic but there's going to be no move to restrict others and all out social war gets waged.

MADD has also been slowly pushing down the legal BAC over the years, too. It's down to .06 in some places now. That's about half a beer for someone my size, I think.
 
jallman said:
A lot of it has to do with MADD. You get a group of hysterical mothers who've lost their baby to a drunk driver in front of congress and who's gonna tell them "no"? It's political suicide to tell mommies that their babies' deaths were tragic but there's going to be no move to restrict others and all out social war gets waged.

MADD has also been slowly pushing down the legal BAC over the years, too. It's down to .06 in some places now. That's about half a beer for someone my size, I think.
Click to expand...

DWAI is 0.05. It's a "baby" DUI; but carries all the same penalties and fines as a regular DUI.
 
FYI a paedophile is someone that is sexually attracted to prepubescent children. Teenage girls are not prepubescent children, so calling him a paedophile is slander. :2wave:

So it's quite obvious that the point of this thread is to attempt to associate New Labour with paedophilia, a silly and incredibly trollish thing to try to do.
 
Last edited:
Khayembii Communique said:
FYI a paedophile is someone that is sexually attracted to prepubescent children. Teenage girls are not prepubescent children, so calling him a paedophile is slander. :2wave:

So it's quite obvious that the point of this thread is to attempt to associate New Labour with paedophilia, a silly and incredibly trollish thing to try to do.
Click to expand...

Silly and incredibly trollish... now, who could you be thinking of?
 
It's interesting that, for example, many 14 year olds could be considered ripe enough for a full-blown illegal sexual relationship with a mature adult, by the last poster but-one. Perhaps if I were to be interested in porking a twelve-year old, he may be less likely to bandy insults about. Indeed, they get juicy earlier too nowadays, apparently!

Mmmmm, fresh meat!
http://www.theweeklyvice.com/2009/11/mother-pimps-her-underage-daughter-out.html


And if those indulging in a holohoax-style denial of the points I make were to actually read the links I put up you may learn something. For example, Harriet Harman AND her husband were senior figures in a civil liberties group which incorporated a pro-paedo organisation.

Many more examples are in the video, in the form of article screenshots, etc.
 
Last edited:
It's interesting that, for example, many 14 year olds could be considered ripe enough for a full-blown illegal sexual relationship with a mature adult, by the last poster but-one. Perhaps if I were to be interested in porking a twelve-year old, he may be less likely to bandy insults about. Indeed, they get juicy earlier too nowadays, apparently!
Click to expand...

Hooray, more empty rhetoric and name calling! Do you have anything substantial to say about anything? New Labour is completely ****ed - there's so much you could criticize them for - and yet you pick this? Seriously?

Keep rambling, troll; you're only making yourself look bad.
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
It's interesting that, for example, many 14 year olds could be considered ripe enough for a full-blown illegal sexual relationship with a mature adult, by the last poster but-one. Perhaps if I were to be interested in porking a twelve-year old, he may be less likely to bandy insults about. Indeed, they get juicy earlier too nowadays, apparently!

Mmmmm, fresh meat!
THE WEEKLY VICE: Mother Pimps Her Underage Daughter Out To Molesters Using Phrase: “Fresh Meat Available”


And if those indulging in a holohoax-style denial of the points I make were to actually read the links I put up you may learn something. For example, Harriet Harman AND her husband were senior figures in a civil liberties group which incorporated a pro-paedo organisation.

Many more examples are in the video, in the form of article screenshots, etc.
Click to expand...

That's classy RoP, comparing those who disagree with you with Holocaust deniers. That really benefits your argument!
 
Well, Khayembii is apparently in denial of things he hasn't even checked out. Pretty 'holohoaxy' stuff to me. And I wonder why he wants to ridicule me for mentioning it?

Yes, there is indeed a vast pile of stuff to criticise New Labour for, on top of the justified paedophilia scandal. (One even went right to the top of Blair's government but it didn't get the wider publicity it deserved.)


Stuff like this, by me:

Huge catalogue: http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/69821-brown-sets-date-his-kicking-destiny-may-6-a.html

Erosion of national pride: http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/70855-england-least-patriotic-country-europe.html

The rest (links inside): http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/65404-lunatics-new-labour-state.html

Climate Change scam: http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...humans-cause-climate-change-tm-even-idle.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...er-more-worthy-punishment-than-criminals.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/70376-left-wing-britain-news-roundup.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...-why-slimy-onanists-have-been-caught-out.html

http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...recking-sound-their-own-laughter-til-end.html


And that's not to mention the ruin of the economy, bank bail-outs and shabby 'nationalisation' of Northern Rock, etc.

I will keep 'rambling'. Gets the truth out and I get letters telling me to keep on with it.
 
Yes, there is indeed a vast pile of stuff to criticise New Labour for, on top of the justified paedophilia scandal.
Click to expand...

FYI a paedophile is someone that is sexually attracted to prepubescent children. Teenage girls are not prepubescent children, so calling him a paedophile is slander. :2wave:

So it's quite obvious that the point of this thread is to attempt to associate New Labour with paedophilia, a silly and incredibly trollish thing to try to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom