• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

French prosecutor: Women who planned attack were directed by ISIS

The whole perception that you're responding to (if the term "perception" can even be used) is a regurgitation of a Faux News item of some time ago and others like it. Dripping with the dishonesty and general ignorance that marks such "outlets".

Aside from the patent sarcasm, have you anything factually pertinent that you have to say?

Or you are just dumping "your daily load" into into the forum ... ?
________________
 
Aside from the patent sarcasm, have you anything factually pertinent that you have to say?
I believe I've already done that by addressing the patent absurdity of the claims that there are no-go zones in Europe (generally) and France (in particular).

Or you are just dumping "your daily load" into into the forum ... ?
If by daily load you mean deserved sarcasm onto the partisan hackery experts here that probably can't even define what a ZUS actually constitutes, yes.

The concept of there being zones in France (since that appears to be the favourite bête noire in their eyes) that are so completely under the control of Muslim insurgency that even the police don't dare venture in, is so absurd that it deserves nothing else in my book.

Neither does the constant repetition of this type of contemptible slander by those mistaking their mindless prejudices for a reflection of any reality. No matter how often it is pointed out to them that even their most arduous advocates (sources) of these skewered "reports" have meanwhile abandoned this rubbish in droves.

If anyone else wants to address, in a more polite form, such prevaricating behavior of our "Europe experts from afar and by the offices of disinformation sites", that's fine.

I've long since lost the necessary patience for that sort of thing.
 
The concept of there being zones in France (since that appears to be the favourite bête noire in their eyes) that are so completely under the control of Muslim insurgency that even the police don't dare venture in, is so absurd that it deserves nothing else in my book.

You've got the wrong country. Try Belgium.

There are zones where the police in Marseilles are reluctant to go, but they are not "Muslim Caliphates". They are areas run by drug-dealers, and at the moment they are killing one another to gain "territory". So, who cares?

There is NO PLACE in France where the police will not either "infiltrate" or "go" in order to pursue a delinquent, and particularly a terrorist. Try googling information, in French, to support your POV. You won't find it. (Otoh, a police-couple - wife and husband - were killed by a Muslim terrorist in their home this year.)

Period. What you write is an affront to the valor of both the police and gendarmerie (which is actually a part of the Army) who have died. (And it does not account for the 83 soldiers killed in Africa fighting ISIS combatants there.)
___________________________
 
There were once white no-go zones in Harlem, but I don't see you mentioning them.

Yes, Muslim Immigrants (aside from the plutocrat oil nations) are amongst the poorest in Europe. They therefore seek low-cost housing when migrating, and it is perfectly natural that they create a "local community due to the commonality of their language" in many countries. This is not a societal phenomenon - it is current throughout Europe. (The Quartier Asiatique or "Asian Quarter", also called Triangle de Choisy or Petite Asie, is the largest commercial and cultural center for the Asian community of Paris.)

Maybe you did not have the experience, but I am a descendant from a European immigrant community and lived in a similar context in New England. These "local language communities" are typical of where immigrants find lowest-cost living-quarters all over Europe. The same phenomenon exists/existed for the Cubans in Florida, or some French-canadians in New England, or Italians in Pennsylvania.

So, yes, there are Muslim radicals in many of these communities in Europe. But, there are also members of those communities who are "police informants" and keep tabs on radical Muslim preachers. I know this for a fact in France, because it has been reported in the press.

It will please you to know, therefore, that just this week, the French government and leaders of the principle Muslim groups in France have agreed that Imams (preachers) must graduate from and be accredited by a school established by the Muslim Community to train them. The intent obviously is to prevent radical muslims from founding "mosques" where they preach.

But, what exactly is the point you are trying to make? (Aside from the fact that you know very little about immigrant communities ...)

Harlem, as far as I know, and the people in it did not plan to impose their culture on the rest of the city or the country. An irrelevant point. As far as Cubans and Italians they have assimilated into the culture, and always planned to. Muslims, many of them, do not want to assimilate. That is a big difference.

Next, what your press reports is what your government wants you to hear. And I would not trust schools established by the Muslim community with their recent track record.

Finally, I am not concerned with all immigrant communities, only Muslim ones. I do not hear of any other group, say Polish immigrants, killing anyone. Do you?
 
Harlem, as far as I know, and the people in it did not plan to impose their culture on the rest of the city or the country. An irrelevant point. As far as Cubans and Italians they have assimilated into the culture, and always planned to. Muslims, many of them, do not want to assimilate. That is a big difference.

Next, what your press reports is what your government wants you to hear. And I would not trust schools established by the Muslim community with their recent track record.

Finally, I am not concerned with all immigrant communities, only Muslim ones. I do not hear of any other group, say Polish immigrants, killing anyone. Do you?

We are talking about extremists, and they like to kill people. Which is why, uh, we call them "extremists". Their brand of extremism is different from ours. We allow everybody to own a gun, even a kalachnikov - which is why the murder rate in the US is "ten times that of other developed countries times".

But does that make the US less murderous than, say, Syria given the relative population sizes?

Which is why, I suggest, Americans cannot understand ISIS, where its foundational-theory comes from (Sunnite Saudi Arabia) and whose petroleum (sold to the US) helped fund ISIS. See here: Saudi Arabia funds and exports Islamic extremism: The truth behind the toxic U.S. relationship with the theocratic monarchy

I'll grant that the situation in the Middle-east is a Ball of Wax. Which is why we (the West) should get the hell out. And, rid ourselves of carbon-based energies.

But we know that aint gonna happin', don't we ... ?
___________________
 
Last edited:
We are talking about extremists, and they like to kill people. Which is why, uh, we call them "extremists". Their brand of extremism is different from ours. We allow everybody to own a gun, even a kalachnikov - which is why the murder rate in the US is "ten times that of other developed countries timeshttp://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-u-s-gun-deaths-compare-to-other-countries/".

But does that make the US less murderous than, say, Syria given the relative population sizes?



Which is why, I suggest, Americans cannot understand ISIS, where its foundational-theory comes from (Sunnite Saudi Arabia) and whose petroleum (sold to the US) helped fund ISIS. See here: Saudi Arabia funds and exports Islamic extremism: The truth behind the toxic U.S. relationship with the theocratic monarchy

I'll grant that the situation in the Middle-east is a Ball of Wax. Which is why we (the West) should get the hell out. And, rid ourselves of carbon-based energies.

But we know that aint gonna happin' dont we ... ?


The murder rate in the US is due in most part to gangs and gang warfare. It unfairly reflects on the population. Again, a irrelevant point because it is inspired by greed not ideology.

As far as the Saudis, our dependence on oil is because lobbyists block new drilling leases and fracking in the guise of environmental concerns. Saudi money is behind much of that. I agree they are a major terrorist backers. But ISIS is on its own in many ways and objects to any relations to the West at all. And support for ISIS reflects in the polls of those(Muslims) who approve of Sharia, death for insulting Islam, and use of violence for political gain. They are not small minorities.

The West should get out. Out of everything. No more aid, no more weapons, no technical support, and no Muslim immigration except to countries with a Muslim majority. We need to get out of the UN, and openly condemn Sharia. Human rights alone are a very good reason to shame Islam. Shame them like their apologists try to shame those who criticize Islam.
 
Daniel Pipes appears to disagree with you (I don't care about the poster that re-floats this crap, seeing how I never respond to him).
He says that he could go there and that things look in order, this does not contradict anything I said. And, no, I do not know him, some American medias' figure I guess?

The police does not ordinarily go there, hence why it IS a no-go zone. But white people can and many do live there, as I already clarified it myself. I didn't pretend either that it was Mad Max, only that the society in those places is not acceptable by French standards because of the Arabic cultures and Islam, because of racism, lawlessness, misogyny and totalitarianism.


Migrants who want to become immigrants collect themselves because of language similarity. It is a common social phenomenon.
Sure, excepted that:

- The Asian and Arabic blocks cannot be compared. Asians recently protested to have more police while Muslims make songs about their fantasies of killing cops. Asians share similar values to ours and many white people own shops in their blocks. The racism against white people is not important in Asian blocks, it is violent and normal in Muslim blocks.

- It is easy to say that it is fine to have foreign neighborhoods when you are not the one who has to live there. One or two may be an acceptable sacrifice, but there are hundreds of Muslim areas, and millions of French people have to live there, as a minority in their own country. And it is very hard to be a minority among Muslims, far more than being a Muslim in France. What justifies this sacrifice?

- The social norms in Muslim blocks are simply unworthy of France. It is a shame that so many people have to suffer antisemitism, homophobia, violent misogyny, etc. It is a shame that so many people have to suffer daily violence and intimidation from their neighbors who use strength and fear all the time, from those who simply assert their dominance, rule criminal networks or enforce an ideology from the 7th century. If you do not give a damn about non-Muslims, at least know that French Muslims, and French Muslim women especially, are the first victims of your complacency.

I live in the boonies of France and, yet, there is a Muslim community here with their own shops and own mosque. Nobody is afraid of them, they are peaceful people - like you and me.
What a great anecdote: "around my bourgeois place where a few Muslims live, I personally heard of no problem, hence there are no problems with Muslims in general".

That "some" have become radicalized is indeed true. But "that some" is a small minority percentage of the population - about 3100 in France.
3100 is only the number of terrorists or very closed from becoming ones. The problem with Muslims is that the majority of them are so far-right they make Le Pen look like a 68er. And the moderates contribute to those problems by supporting their community and shouldering with them even when they disagree.

As always we lack data about France, but for example it has been established that half are antisemities and homophobes, half think we want to destroy Islam, 75% want to prohibit blasphemy,

You do not know Muslims. One or two of them maybe, superficially, but you do not know them and their communities, nor the modern history of Muslim countries. You are ignorant of the rise of religious radicalism all over the world as a result of the failures of Arab nationalism, as every academic could explain to you. You are ignorant that this rise of radicalism has also hit French neighborhoods since the 90's and how it has since started to harm people every day, mostly Muslims.


And I cannot even blame you for your ignorance: you live in a country where it is prohibited to measure reality and to discuss it. Hence why France is so slow to extract itself from the illusions it forced itself in.
 
Last edited:
But does that make the US less murderous than, say, Syria given the relative population sizes?
Comparing a country at war with the USA is a ridiculous assertion. If you really think that life in Syria is no more dangerous than in the USA, then why are you even supporting Syrian refugees?

Which is why, I suggest, Americans cannot understand ISIS, where its foundational-theory comes from (Sunnite Saudi Arabia) and whose petroleum (sold to the US) helped fund ISIS.
This is ridiculous: the whole world needs oil and Saudi Arabia is a far too important producer to not get rich as a result. Blaming the USA because their companies are the ones taking a share of this money when they sell it to the rest of the world is being blind to the world's dependence to oil. On the opposite the USA should be commended for having pioneered shale oil, which made them the first world producers and net exporters, and has resulted in a very cheap oil that is bad for Saudi Arabia, the Middle East and other oil producers, and good for everyone else.

Besides the whole narrative about Saudi Arabia causing fundamentalism is a plain lie. They merely did spit oil on fire. Islamic fundamentalism is an official school of Islam since the 8th century and the real cause of the widespread Islamism is the failure of the Muslim nations, and the subsequent rise of the Islamic totalitarianism promoted by the Muslim Brotherhood and other pseudo-moderate currents since the half of the XXth century, a movement that gained strength back in the 80's after Arab nationalisms failed.

Those movements try making Islam the alpha and omega of their societies, they insist to base everything upon Islam, from education to justice, from social status to gender relationships. They force a come back to the 7th century. In this context of religious radicalism, where Islam is turned into a totalitarianism, and given the instability of their young, frustrated and patriarchal countries, the resulting violence was inevitable. What is happening in Muslim countries today is comparable with what happened between the two world wars in Europe, when fascism did rise everywhere. The catalyst was the absolute nation then, now it is the absolute Islam. And in both cases this happened because of divided and weakened nations/identities, which is exactly what the EU promotes.
 
Last edited:
He says that he could go there and that things look in order, this does not contradict anything I said. And, no, I do not know him, some American medias' figure I guess?
He's an ardent anti-Islam guy.

The police does not ordinarily go there, hence why it IS a no-go zone. But white people can and many do live there, as I already clarified it myself. I didn't pretend either that it was Mad Max, only that the society in those places is not acceptable by French standards because of the Arabic cultures and Islam, because of racism, lawlessness, misogyny and totalitarianism...........~
The original claim made by certain factions of US media was (and still is) that there are areas in France (and virtually everywhere else in Europe) where the country's law is overturned by foreign customs (here Islamic ones) having rendered it powerless and the police thus dare not venture. That is the understanding of no-go zones that such publications hold and promote.

The claim is pure bovine manure and that's what I was addressing.

As to acceptability by French standards, I'd hold that you are as little empowered to speak for all of France as I am for the whole country that I live in.
 
He's an ardent anti-Islam guy.

The original claim made by certain factions of US media was (and still is) that there are areas in France (and virtually everywhere else in Europe) where the country's law is overturned by foreign customs (here Islamic ones) having rendered it powerless and the police thus dare not venture. That is the understanding of no-go zones that such publications hold and promote.

The claim is pure bovine manure and that's what I was addressing.

As to acceptability by French standards, I'd hold that you are as little empowered to speak for all of France as I am for the whole country that I live in.

It is not. Your claim is bull****. And each day more and more grow tired of Islam, and tired of excuses, or just outright lies.
 
The original claim made by certain factions of US media was (and still is) that there are areas in France (and virtually everywhere else in Europe) where the country's law is overturned by foreign customs (here Islamic ones) having rendered it powerless and the police thus dare not venture. That is the understanding of no-go zones that such publications hold and promote.
And they are completely right.

Your sexuality, clothing, alimentation or opinions can get you assaulted and possibly killed. Hundreds of thousands of women in France chose their clothes in order to conform to social pressures, intimidation and assaults that are the norm in those places. In those places a Jew or gay would have to hide their identity. Let's not even mention how trivial it is to buy drugs or stolen goods. Or the many young boys and girls who are afraid going to holidays because they are afraid to be married by force. All of this obviously goes against the French law, yet they are the norms in those places where millions live in France.

And the police is indeed powerless since they ordinarily do not enter those zones (because this is really dangerous for them, cops are killed every year by Muslims and there are ambushes, traps, etc, and sometimes the guys use military weapons; staging an ambush is a way to kill boredom and killing a cop would earn respect). They are unable to impose the French laws in those places. When they enter, it is only at the periphery, or very quickly in cars on roads with enough space to escape, or with assault squads and preferably for lightning fast operations. They have orders for this, and they are wise. The only time I saw a police car venture within my ghetto, it has been surrounded by hundred of people shaking the car, and we all though they were going to be killed! And it was a moderate ghetto, decades ago.

It was like that when I was young, it is worse now by any measure. You are the one incorrectly informed, as millions of people see it everyday.
 
Last edited:
And they are completely right......................
on the premise that there are places in France where the police dare not go (and thus do not go), because those places are outside of French law, they couldn't be more wrong.

The rest of your above post I won't address, having already made clear how I treat gish galloping.
 
Back
Top Bottom