- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 88,712
- Reaction score
- 39,674
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The attack on Gabby Giffords was a crime. It was not a terrorist attack. It wasnt attached to an idea or an agenda.Excuses excuses. The attack on Gabby Gifford has never by the American media (mostly) nor the American right classified as a terror attack.. in fact most homegrown attacks in the US are rarely named as such, even though they meet your criteria. Even the Sandy Hook guy had an cause and did it in the name of that cause.. he was crazy yea, like many wacko gun owners, but it was a cause and he was a terrorist.. but I have yet to hear the right wing name Sandy Hook as a terror attack..
So spare me the "criteria" crap.. we both know, as long as a Muslim is involved then Americans and many Europeans will say "terror", but when the attacker is not a Muslim, then naww... sick in the head he was..
This probably will come as a shock to you, but Muslims commit crimes. Sometimes they steal. Sometimes they rape. Sometimes they commit murder. And when they do it isnt always a terrorist attack> Sometimes...its 'just' a crime. People commit crimes. But when people commit crimes based on an ideology where the horror of the event is meant to promote the furtherance of the cause, they are committing a terrorist attack. Dylan Roof committed a terrorist attack. Adam Lanza did not.
I doubt the facts matter to you. You are one of those that has this weird kneejerk need to defend Fundamentalist Islam.