• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brussels 'March Against Fear' cancelled due to... Fear

William Rea said:
Says the person that typed a 1st Grader OP. Can I ask if you have any kind of experience of authority and the duty of care that comes with it?
Click to expand...

Why don't you tell me your background, since that's the point of you asking about mine?
 
truthatallcost said:
In other words, you can't refute the fact that A. Molenbeek is a de facto Islamic colony, B. Brussels police avoid Molenbeek as much as possible, C. Areas in England and France mirror Molenbeek's status as being off limits to non Muslims.
Click to expand...
To educate you further, those claims were yours.

I admit being at fault in that I should simply have challenged you to back them up with something more than just further assertions and assumptions.

The desire (born from past experience and not necessarily exclusive wrt to you) to simply dismiss them as rubbish just required expression. A desire, I might add, growing with the way this sub-forum is heading.

But back up your claims by all means.

Or don't.

Knowing Paris and Bruxelles better than most that spout on here, opinionated rants on what anyone else concludes from a news article they've managed to crap and paste are not really important to me.
 
truthatallcost said:
Why don't you tell me your background, since that's the point of you asking about mine?
Click to expand...

Sure, I have had responsibility for a duty of care both in personal and professional life, it really is not that uncommon and most people do it without even realising that they are. I understand the concept through experience, beyond that, you can take it or leave it.
 
truthatallcost said:
Why don't you tell me your background, since that's the point of you asking about mine?
Click to expand...
tu quoque, like all logical fallacies committed in debate, represents the ultimate admission of defeat.
 
Chagos said:
tu quoque, like all logical fallacies committed in debate, represents the ultimate admission of defeat.
Click to expand...

Paying attention chagos? William Rea asked me about my experience in authority before I brought the subject up. Go review what tu quoque means, they obviously haven't covered that in your 4th grade studies yet, I understand.
 
truthatallcost said:
Paying attention chagos? William Rea asked me about my experience in authority before I brought the subject up. Go review what tu quoque means, they obviously haven't covered that in your 4th grade studies yet, I understand.
Click to expand...

I answered your question. What now?
 
I wonder when the next one is going to hit. Suicide bombings in Europe only used to happen every few years now it is every few months.
 
truthatallcost said:
I don't read every quote Trump makes, and I've been familiar with this subject long before your personal Trump hysteria began.
Click to expand...

The last one who claimed no-go zones wouldn't answer except to show that Trump and 5 scared British policemen felt unsafe on our streets. There is nowhere in the UK that is public land which is a no-go zone. I showed him British white extremist groups happily confronting extremist muslims outside their mosques in so called "no-go" zones and he couldn't come back.

End of. Whatever Trump tells you.
 
truthatallcost said:
Paying attention chagos? William Rea asked me about my experience in authority before I brought the subject up. Go review what tu quoque means, they obviously haven't covered that in your 4th grade studies yet, I understand.
Click to expand...
Yet more proof of "truthatallcosts doesn't get it" and when that happens goes totally reverse.

When somebody challenges YOU on your experience and YOU go "let's have yours first" (which is exactly what you're admitting to above), who the heck, whatever grade they made or flunked completely, d'ya reckon is committing tu quoque?

Now you can be as insulting about my or anybody else's level of education as you wish, it takes nothing away from you labelling yourself as a fool in this particular instance and by your particular mode of arguing here.

Heck, your apparent lack of understanding the whole fallacy and which role need be played by whom to constitute it, raises some doubts as to YOUR education level. At least where fallacies of logic were taught.
 
Infinite Chaos said:
The last one who claimed no-go zones wouldn't answer except to show that Trump and 5 scared British policemen felt unsafe on our streets. There is nowhere in the UK that is public land which is a no-go zone. I showed him British white extremist groups happily confronting extremist muslims outside their mosques in so called "no-go" zones and he couldn't come back.

End of. Whatever Trump tells you.
Click to expand...

No- no go zones in the UK?

 
William Rea said:
I wish I was wise, in this forum section at the moment it doesn't take much to be the one eyed man.
Click to expand...
Heck, right now you might as well be blind and you'd still have the edge.
 
PakPuk said:
No- no go zones in the UK?
[/snip]
Click to expand...
...declared officially by whom or what?

The "no-go" applies specifically (no matter what you think) to "where the authorities no longer (dare) venture".

Now evidence that one.
 
truthatallcost said:
How would that be relevant?
Click to expand...

Why did you need to ask me then? Why so coy all of a sudden, that's not the tone of your OP is it?

I am interested as to whether you understand the duty of care that comes with authority and therefore, you might understand the nuance of the situation?
 
Chagos said:
...declared officially by whom or what?

The "no-go" applies specifically (no matter what you think) to "where the authorities no longer (dare) venture".

Now evidence that one.
Click to expand...

No go zones don't just apply to authorities they apply to the average citizen and whether they feel safe walking through that area now do those areas in the videos look a safe and friendly place to be?
 
Infinite Chaos said:
~ British white extremist groups happily confronting extremist muslims outside their mosques in so called "no-go" zones ~
Click to expand...

PakPuk said:
Click to expand...


Maybe Mr "truth" will believe you as an American as he plainly won't believe me here living in my own country. Thanks for doing my work for me; maybe you could explain to him how an extremist white group could carry out "christian patrols" in a so-called no go zone.

Chagos said:
...declared officially by whom or what?

The "no-go" applies specifically (no matter what you think) to "where the authorities no longer (dare) venture".

Now evidence that one.
Click to expand...

Don't hold your breath - they need to see what Breibart or Mr Trump tells them to think.
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Maybe Mr "truth" will believe you as an American as he plainly won't believe me here living in my own country. Thanks for doing my work for me; maybe you could explain to him how an extremist white group could carry out "christian patrols" in a so-called no go zone.



Don't hold your breath - they need to see what Breibart or Mr Trump tells them to think.
Click to expand...

So being attacked physically and verbally for carrying a cross is not a no go area? What world are you living in?
 
Infinite Chaos said:
The last one who claimed no-go zones wouldn't answer except to show that Trump and 5 scared British policemen felt unsafe on our streets. There is nowhere in the UK that is public land which is a no-go zone. I showed him British white extremist groups happily confronting extremist muslims outside their mosques in so called "no-go" zones and he couldn't come back.

End of. Whatever Trump tells you.
Click to expand...

What about Lee Rigby? Did he run into the harsh reality of residents from no go zones?
What about Brusthom Ziamani, who tried to emulate the attack on Rigby?
 
PakPuk said:
So being attacked physically and verbally for carrying a cross is not a no go area? What world are you living in?
Click to expand...

You obviously think Britain First are just an innocent group of christians?

:lamo

truthatallcost said:
What about Lee Rigby? Did he run into the harsh reality of residents from no go zones?
What about Brusthom Ziamani, who tried to emulate the attack on Rigby?
Click to expand...

Putting Lee Rigby innocently going to his barracks into the same category as a Britain First march as as stupid a comment I've ever read on this forum.
 
Usually I would say this is a either laugh or cry moment, but for a lot of years I believed in the EU dream so the only way for me to go is to cry.
 
Infinite Chaos said:
You obviously think Britain First are just an innocent group of christians?

:lamo
Click to expand...

So give me the dirt on them. If someone walks down the street with a cross and they get physically and verbally assaulted I would call that a no go zone. Yet people like yourself tell us that is a conspiracy theory while you sit back thousands of miles away from your nearest Muslim ghetto.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom