• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Keighley abuse: Twelve men jailed for sexually exploiting girl

The first time it was aired, was last night. There was nothing wow about it. It was based on scientific research, and how our brains are trained to be 'racist ' by our experience. Your point?

Yes, racism is a learned behaviour. Passed down to the younger generations like the family good china.

Fortunately, I wasn't raised in an enviroment such as that.
 
This kind of behaviour is disgusting, irrespective of who the perpetrators of such heinous crimes are. I don't see it as "worse" because it's muslims, I find it repulsive, period.

You are right it is heinous regardless of who commits the crime. This should all be about the victim and punishing the culprit.
 
Really? There seemed to be far more coverage of what Catholic priests got up to and lots of discussion about how the culture surrounding the sacrament of priesthood enabled it. That kind of open discussion tends to be healthy.

What's good for the goose....

You seem to forget that a priest is not just a man who is religious, a priest is in charge of the people in his flock. He was misusing the power of his office/vocation/calling to molest children. Children who were placed at his mercy by the parents who though he was the spiritual leader and guide/all around good guy for their children.

Now if an Imam was found doing this that would be a comparable case, but this is not about someone misusing their religious stature/religious position of power to abuse.

All of that does not make the suffering of the child worse, except for the double whammy this child has to suffer. First the loss of her innocence to some perverted sick moron. And then to realize that someone who had a position of trust does something to a child in such a manner. A further problem that angers many is that the church was keeping their child-raping priests safe by moving them around to new hunting grounds so that they could keep abusing their position of trust.

For the rest a child raping priest is just as bad as a child raping commoner/regular person. Because it is not their faith that causes them to rape, it is their pedophile nature that is doing that.
 
and coming right back at you, why did you not AGREE that they did was wrong until now? Hmmm?

That could have been your FIRST POST but it was not.

Your FIRST POST DIVERTED the bad they did and pointed at others, rather than agreeing with everyone that what these MUSLIM men did was wrong.

Your fist post was to divert and dismiss, by pointing to others.....NOT agreeing what they did was in any way bad. Your very first post was APOLOGIZING for them and attempting to divert attention away from their crimes.

That is the Classic definition of an APOLOGIST.

Your first action was to divert and dismiss. That tells me where your heart is.

Welcome to the world of PeteEU
 
Yes, racism is a learned behaviour. Passed down to the younger generations like the family good china.

Fortunately, I wasn't raised in an enviroment such as that.

No, it wasn't concentrating on that type of learned behaviour. You do it subconsciously. The mixed race girl was shocked at her results, and it was consistent with others doing the experiment.
 
Another city, another heinous act of organised gang rapes, the same perpetrators, two brothers as part of the gang, again. ALL so familiar.

You have no idea whatsoever of how familiar it is.

From here: Crime in the United States: Arrests - 32.5 percent of forcible rapes are committed by blacks in the US.

Worse yet, 65% are committed by whites!

Why not harp about these facts happening in your own back yard? Because the Muslims in Europe are so much more of a threat?

The IS jihadists are a tiny, tiny percentage of the entire Muslim population, and yes they have the means to wreak havoc. But the reason the jihadists exist even is due to one singular fact: The US invaded Iraq and caused a shift in religious power, for which the losers went off to Syria and became the IS.

The US is clearly responsible for what is happening in Middle-east today. When will Uncle Sam learn to leave the world alone and attend to his own internal problems, which are considerable ...
 
Last edited:
You have no idea whatsoever of how familiar it is.

From here: Crime in the United States: Arrests - 32.5 percent of forcible rapes are committed by blacks in the US.

Worse yet, 65% are committed by whites!

Why not harp about these facts happening in your own back yard? Because the Muslims in Europe are so much more of a threat?

The IS jihadists are a tiny, tiny percentage of the entire Muslim population, and yes they have the means to wreak havoc. But the reason the jihadists exist even is due to one singular fact: The US invaded Iraq and caused a shift in religious power, for which the losers went off to Syria and became the IS.

The US is clearly responsible for what is happening in Middle-east today. When will Uncle Sam learn to leave the world alone and attend to his own internal problems, which are considerable ...

You do realise I live in the UK, so this is "my backyard ".
 
You do realise I live in the UK, so this is "my backyard ".

No, I did not realize that you were a Brit. But I did wonder from where the "good English" came, it's so rare around this forum.

Anyway, whether you are attacked by a Jihadist or not is no reason to blame an entire religion. Even less reason to remonstrate how "the neighborhood is going to the dogs" because a "Mussie"-family moved in.

This is a very Brave New World (not Huxley's) that we exist in - so you'd best give proper attention to your own Brit-rowdies who are banned from soccer-games because of their habit to drink 'n fight. I suspect that they are an even greater threat physically.

Besides, you've got the English Channel protecting you (plural) - and the French have the hard-work in Calais, don't they ... ?

PS: Je ne suis pas Charlie, je suis un Amerlok qui habite la France ... ;^) To each their own aspersions.
 
Last edited:
For the rest a child raping priest is just as bad as a child raping commoner/regular person. Because it is not their faith that causes them to rape, it is their pedophile nature that is doing that.

Too true, but as regards the Roman Catholic church it was also Rome that preferred that such "incidents" were kept confidential.

So, the Holy See has its own grim implication in the matter to address ...
 
Too true, but as regards the Roman Catholic church it was also Rome that preferred that such "incidents" were kept confidential.

So, the Holy See has its own grim implication in the matter to address ...

Sadly yes, and that has lead to millions more victims because the holy see has decided that they are a law unto themselves and that they are above the limits and responsibilities that other institutions are held to.
 
You seem to forget that a priest is not just a man who is religious, a priest is in charge of the people in his flock.

All paedophilia is done from a position of power.

For the rest a child raping priest is just as bad as a child raping commoner/regular person. Because it is not their faith that causes them to rape, it is their pedophile nature that is doing that.

You seem to forget the institutional enabling of these activities, which is what is comparable between the two.
 
... the holy see has decided that they are a law unto themselves and that they are above the limits and responsibilities that other institutions are held to.

Functionally, it is recognized as another country. But the diplomatic status of those who work abroad for the Vatican is limited to those individuals. Ordinary priests/nuns are not covered by that status.

There is nothing in most countries that prevents them from being taken to court as priest/preacher for improper conduct. (Unfortunately, in the US, that does no cover those who "preach-God and pilfer people of their money". And they are many - of course, anyone who thinks they can buy their way into heaven likely deserves to get "plucked" ...)
 
Functionally, it is recognized as another country. But the diplomatic status of those who work abroad for the Vatican is limited to those individuals. Ordinary priests/nuns are not covered by that status.

There is nothing in most countries that prevents them from being taken to court as priest/preacher for improper conduct. (Unfortunately, in the US, that does no cover those who "preach-God and pilfer people of their money". And they are many - of course, anyone who thinks they can buy their way into heaven likely deserves to get "plucked" ...)

Yes, but in the past they moved around the priests so that they would not be prosecuted for their crimes.
 
You have no idea whatsoever of how familiar it is.

From here: Crime in the United States: Arrests - 32.5 percent of forcible rapes are committed by blacks in the US.

Worse yet, 65% are committed by whites!

Why not harp about these facts happening in your own back yard? Because the Muslims in Europe are so much more of a threat?

The IS jihadists are a tiny, tiny percentage of the entire Muslim population, and yes they have the means to wreak havoc. But the reason the jihadists exist even is due to one singular fact: The US invaded Iraq and caused a shift in religious power, for which the losers went off to Syria and became the IS.

The US is clearly responsible for what is happening in Middle-east today. When will Uncle Sam learn to leave the world alone and attend to his own internal problems, which are considerable ...

Yes, if only we'd done that while you in France were goose-stepping, heil-Hitlering, and turning your Jews over to the Germans as fast as you could.
 
Yes, if only we'd done that while you in France were goose-stepping, heil-Hitlering, and turning your Jews over to the Germans as fast as you could.

Absolutely irrelevant.

Fodder for nitwits ...
 
Back
Top Bottom