• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'The EU is a Gigantic Sham, and Paris Was the End’

I seen nothing that supports that argument. One does not infer the other, and would add that prior to creation of even the EEC that those countries co-existed and traded with each other. As for former Yugoslavia, I would argue that not even EU membership would have changed what happened. Note there are those in Scotland attempting to break away from UK, and same goes for those in Catalonia pushing to break away from Spain with both UK and Spain members of EU.

Europe had been at war just thirteen years before the signing of the Treaty of Rome.

You cannot compare the Scottish or Catalan desire for independence with what happened in the former YU. Perhaps you understand the former YU even less than you understand the EU. Lecture me on Swansea if you will, but as someone who was born in Slovenia over 50 years ago, I know the ex-YU just a little better than your wife's family, Cariad.
 
Europe had been at war just thirteen years before the signing of the Treaty of Rome.

You cannot compare the Scottish or Catalan desire for independence with what happened in the former YU. Perhaps you understand the former YU even less than you understand the EU. Lecture me on Swansea if you will, but as someone who was born in Slovenia over 50 years ago, I know the ex-YU just a little better than your wife's family, Cariad.

Oh yes I can because there is nothing in what you said that shows the peace enjoyed since would not have occurred even if EU did not exist.
 
Oh yes I can because there is nothing in what you said that shows the peace enjoyed since would not have occurred even if EU did not exist.

Nobody can prove that it would or it wouldn't, but looking at Europe's history, it seems obvious that the cooperation brought about by the EU has helped to keep peace in western Europe.
 
Nobody can prove that it would or it wouldn't, but looking at Europe's history, it seems obvious that the cooperation brought about by the EU has helped to keep peace in western Europe.

As you say, no-one can prove it one way or the other, and no, it does not seem obvious. You are speculating on something that you cannot support. EU or not, I put it to you that the peace all those years would had still happened, and that is an opinion you cannot disprove nor I prove. But there it is.
 
As you say, no-one can prove it one way or the other, and no, it does not seem obvious. You are speculating on something that you cannot support. EU or not, I put it to you that the peace all those years would had still happened, and that is an opinion you cannot disprove nor I prove. But there it is.

Then we agree to differ Cariad.
 
Back
Top Bottom