Re: Refugee crisis could spark WAR if Austria closes border with Germany, Merkel warn
What part of this perplexes you or would have you believe that it's in reference to AQ fighters?
What perplexes me is the confusion that the article makes while attempting to summarize the study. What frustrates me is inaccess to the study itself!!!! So now we will have to resort to guessing rather than read actual figures!!!
Here for instance:
War and occupation directly and indirectly claimed the lives of about a half-million Iraqis from 2003 to 2011, according to a groundbreaking survey of 1,960 Iraqi households.
The survey responses point to around 405,000 deaths attributable to the war and occupation in Iraq from 2003 to 2011. At least another 56,000 deaths should be added to that total from households forced to flee Iraq, the study authors estimate. More than 60 percent of the excess deaths of men, women, and children reported from 2003 to 2011 were the direct result of shootings, bombings, airstrikes, or other violence, according to the study. The rest came indirectly, from stress-related heart attacks or ruined sanitation and hospitals.
I calculated the number 141,705 that was killed from the coalition forces. Nearly just as much was killed from Al Qaeda. So now you have that confusing number 60% that applies to all forms of killing "of men, women, and children reported from 2003 to 2011 were the direct result of shootings, bombings, airstrikes, or other violence, according to the study. The rest came indirectly, from stress-related heart attacks or ruined sanitation and hospitals."
Begs the questions: Just how
freaking many of children alone from that "60%" is the coalition alone (removing AQ) to be blamed for!?
AQ could kill in all the ways mentioned above except airstrikes, and it could also be blamed for secondary indirect deaths of said civilians. Who is responsible for the murdering how many children is missing in the darn summary!
Further, men and women whom have also died is mentioned. Just because the data were taken from "households" it does not proves that they are "innocent civilians." If we had access to the original study we could have known more about this point. But as it is it could be loyal soldiers of Saddam attacking the coalition from their households?
Then, you have that vague number "60%" again, that also applies to this population as well as includes both killing forces such as AQ and the coalition. So the question again is: Just how many of men and women whom are definitely civilians from that "60%" is the coalition alone (removing AQ) to be blamed for?
As it is the report summary is very messy. Just put all the killing factors in one place (coalition, AQ, stress), claim a number that 60% died from them all (without being precise exactly who killed whom and to what degree?), and keep their connection to Iraqi military vague with the "household" comment, and you end up with a pretty messed up summary, that cannot answer the questions above!