- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 33,000
- Reaction score
- 13,973
- Location
- FL - Daytona
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
In this piece here.....not only do they say Obama has a credibility issue with Putin and Russia. But others that are our partners too.
Ukraine crisis: What’s the point of US military activity near Russia?
The modest US show of force – a handful of jet fighters in Eastern European skies and a single warship to the Black Sea – is intended more to calm the nerves of former Soviet republics and satellites nervous about Moscow’s actions in Ukraine, regional experts say, than it is designed to send Russia into retreat with its tail between its legs.
The US military activities “are clearly meant to reassure our allies about the US commitment to NATO and to them,” says Paul Saunders, executive director of the Center for the National Interest, a Washington think tank with expertise in US-Russia relations. “It’s really an effort to demonstrate to the new NATO members in particular,” he adds, “that the US is standing with them.”
As Heather Conley of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington notes, there’s even a term for what the US is looking to accomplish with its ramped up NATO-area activity. “It’s really meant as ‘strategic reassurance’ as they say in NATO parlance,” says Ms. Conley, director of CSIS’s Europe Program.
The Pentagon announced this week that it sent six F-15 fighter jets to Lithuania to beef up a NATO air patrol mission over the Baltic states, and that it was expanding joint aviation exercises with Poland. On Friday the Navy announced it has sent a guided-missile destroyer, the USS Truxtun, into the Black Sea – where Crimea is located.
Secretary of State John Kerry underscored the importance of responding to the jitters running through Eastern Europe when he said at a press conference in Paris Wednesday that the Pentagon’s actions were “concrete steps to reassure our NATO allies.” What the US military steps do not portend, everyone agrees, is a US military intervention in the Ukraine crisis.
Russia is a nuclear-weapons state, and that makes it very unlikely the US would undertake military action against it,” he says. “The Russians understand we’re not going to risk a nuclear escalation over a part of Ukraine where some 2 million people live,” he adds. The downside of that reality is that it leaves Russia assuming that its actions are not going to get much push-back from the outside world, including the US.
“The administration has a real credibility problem with Russia,” Saunders says.
That “credibility problem” afflicting President Obama extends beyond Russia to many US allies and partners, others say. Indeed the broader message of the US military steps in Eastern Europe may be that the US is an engaged and robust power that stands by its partners, the CSIS’s Conley says.....snip~
Ukraine crisis: What
We've got to be very careful, not to get into a tit for tat, with Russia. They have more interests in the Ukraine than we do and have a history of not backing down, when they think they're in the right. Back in the beginning of nuke testing and the Cold War, they tested a 57MegaTon: H-bomb called the Tsar Bomba that turned out to be far more powerful than they anticipated. It had effects for a 200 mile radius and was a little crazy, compared to anything previously tested. Things could spin out really fast.