• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Muslim immigrants in Europe: What shall we do? [W:67,W:115]

Funny, I remember you used to quote pew research centre extensively however a lot of their more recent polls and research has started to show a different view from your perception of the muslim problem.

Pew research is a legitimate organization. Some of the cr@p Alexa uses is Islamist or neo Nazi and exists only to propagandize.

That you are so incapable of distinguishing between the different nature of these says much.
 
Pew research is a legitimate organization. Some of the cr@p Alexa uses is Islamist or neo Nazi and exists only to propagandize.

That you are so incapable of distinguishing between the different nature of these says much.

That might have been meant with vitriol but it was actually funny for being so petty.
 
That might have been meant with vitriol but it was actually funny for being so petty.

It was just matter of fact. Alexa has quite the track record of using whatever dodgy source she can dredge up to propaganize her point of view. Some of these have been Islamist or neo Nazi in nature.

Pew is neither -- most obviously so -- and my noting your inability to distinguish between the two is just common sense rather than pettiness.
 
It was just matter of fact. Alexa has quite the track record of using whatever dodgy source she can dredge up to propaganize her point of view. Some of these have been Islamist or neo Nazi in nature.

Pew is neither -- most obviously so -- and my noting your inability to distinguish between the two is just common sense rather than pettiness.

No, Alexa was right in her links in this thread and I was right about your post.
 
Pew research is a legitimate organization. Some of the cr@p Alexa uses is Islamist or neo Nazi and exists only to propagandize.

That you are so incapable of distinguishing between the different nature of these says much.

Quit this lying. You did indeed used to go on about Pew reports until I pointed out that you did not get your information from the Pew Research Centre but rather in the hate site Daniel Pikes. Guess he is not giving so much now. That is why thankfully you no longer answer my posts.

You were asked once before to give links to these sites when you started this personal hate baiting based on lies. All you could come up with was some orthodox Jewish site I had quoted two or three years previously which is split in two and the larger part has nothing to do with the radical splinter group which went off to Iran and at the time I knew nothing about.

You have lost all the argument here and all you have done is come back again and again like a parrot with the same old again and again. Realising you have lost the argument, you believe the way to go is to make untrue hateful accusations.

I never have nor never will support neo nazi's but I know people who supported the BNP and I know people who go to another site which I mainly use now and give thanks to White Nationalists, neo nazi's and I can tell you, they are of your lot.
 
Quit this lying. You did indeed used to go on about Pew reports until I pointed out that you did not get your information from the Pew Research Centre but rather in the hate site Daniel Pikes. Guess he is not giving so much now. That is why thankfully you no longer answer my posts.

You were asked once before to give links to these sites when you started this personal hate baiting based on lies. All you could come up with was some orthodox Jewish site I had quoted two or three years previously which is split in two and the larger part has nothing to do with the radical splinter group which went off to Iran and at the time I knew nothing about.

You have lost all the argument here and all you have done is come back again and again like a parrot with the same old again and again. Realising you have lost the argument, you believe the way to go is to make untrue hateful accusations.

I never have nor never will support neo nazi's but I know people who supported the BNP and I know people who go to another site which I mainly use now and give thanks to White Nationalists, neo nazi's and I can tell you, they are of your lot.

I am not lying at all. I went to one of the sites you were promoting, and it was a hardcore Islamist site talking about the legitimacy of killing Jews. You have been called on the nature of the sites you use so many times, it isn't even funny.


I have never referenced Daniel Pipes at all.
 
No, Alexa was right in her links in this thread and I was right about your post.

I haven't even looked at her links. I pay them no attention since she does not concern herself with finding responsible sites and doesn't care.
 
alexa said:
Quit this lying. You did indeed used to go on about Pew reports until I pointed out that you did not get your information from the Pew Research Centre but rather in the hate site Daniel Pikes. Guess he is not giving so much now. That is why thankfully you no longer answer my posts.

You were asked once before to give links to these sites when you started this personal hate baiting based on lies. All you could come up with was some orthodox Jewish site
I had quoted two or three years previously which is split in two and the larger part has nothing to do with the radical splinter group which went off to Iran and at the time I knew nothing about....
I am not lying at all. I went to one of the sites you were promoting, and it was a hardcore Islamist site talking about the legitimacy of killing Jews. You have been called on the nature of the sites you use so many times, it isn't even funny.

I have never referenced Daniel Pipes at all.
Yeah. I've told her that before.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/europ...no-longer-english-city-14.html#post1059783673
In years of Gardener's posts, I've never seen him cite Pipes.
You [alexa] have however, and I did perhaps a few times, in Years. ie, his excellent piece on Jerusalem: http://www.debatepolitics.com/middl...ians-really-want-state-19.html#post1058512431

But as I pointed out/thrashed andalublue with: http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/67405-fallaci-write-europe-21.html#post1059490486

He's a far Better source than most of your Far left fringers or previously acknowledged areas of study/expertise:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/news-weird/89033-why-your-horoscope-2011-wrong-3.html#post1059205537
But she continues Lying.

Not that using Pipes who alexa Goofily compares to David Duke is a problem.
See my Wiki Link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Pipes in the above where we see Pipes lifetime of credentials and Superb University positions.
He's Taught at Harvard, University of Chicago, the Naval War College, and most recently Pepperdine.
"David Duke" is a Ridiculous/Insane comparison.

Further, on Gardener Never using Pew but secondary sites as Pipes and Orthodox Jewish ones.
Yet more alexa Lies.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls...muslims-do-they-compare-2.html#post1060112255
I find that precious few have an accurate notion of what Muslims believe. This is true for those who routinely bash them, but as much, or even more true for those who offer little but knee jerk defense, for even as Muslim belief is not monolithic nor universally supportive of terrorism, there is still much that is troublesome. Take, for instance, the majority that refuses to believe that Arabs carried out 911 or the extreme degree to which Muslims despise and persecute Jews. Antisemitic attitudes run over 99% in some Muslim countries.

I would think people of all political stripes would be well advised to investigate the various Pew reports when it comes to Muslim attitudes. There is so much ignorant b.s. being thrown around by people who haven't the foggiest idea what they are talking about, and base their opinions on little more than their imagination that it is difficult to even know where to begin.

This would be a good place to start. The Great Divide: How Westerners and Muslims View Each Other | Pew Global Attitudes Project
OR:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe/58588-muslims-cannot-integrate-into-west-6.html#post1058323053
Have you ever considered discussing issues WITHOUT all the dishonest spin? You lift one paragraph from a Pew report where they simply quote an advocate of multiculturalism and then proceed to claim that they "are happy with the way multiculturalism is going". They are a research centre and are not in the business of projecting their own bias such as you suggest. THey did not endorse such a policy, but merely quoted one who does.

As far as the reports that are so easy to find via rudimentary searches, but somehow beyond your means despite the carefully selected passage that you did quote, I will save you the trouble and link to one such study here. It is what it is, and those who attempt to spin it according to their own bias are simply engaged in the art of propaganda rather than intelligent analysis.

http://Pewglobal.org/reports/pdf/253.pdf

Islamic Extremism: Common Concern for Muslim and Western Publics: I. How Muslims and Westerners See Each Other - Pew Global Attitudes Project

I believe that's quite sufficient to 100% Refute alexa .. Again.
 
Last edited:
I will only refute the following, rather than your conjecture.

You say the following,

The conversation/reply was Not about Global Jihad. Which I certainly understand better than you do.

then,

It was about whose side had the more radical Muslim population, and secondarily now, why.

And you understand 'Global Jihad'? it is called global jihad for a reason. Moreover, I didn't realize the UK and America were on different sides:doh I'm sure the latest casualty/death (a Grenadier Guard) in Afghanistan would be pleased to hear such togetherness.....


This is not just about Afghanistan either... barely at all in fact. But FYI it's the USA who has Guantanamo, while in the UK the same people preach in Finsbury :^)

Finsbury Park Mosque » Working for a better future. You really need to keep up to date with your info. It seems a change at the top has brought Finsbury away from the fanatics. They put on an event to celebrate the Olympics.

"Finsbury Park Mosque was part of the Olympic-themed family picnic and sports day along with other churches and mosques and community centres in Finsbury Park last Sunday 15/7/12 from 1-4pm. It was at track-in-park and events include running, football and children's activities such as sack rac"

They never encouraged other faiths to participate:eek: that's it I'm calling the Police!! Interfaith intermingling...whatever next?

It's about one immigrants in one part of the world being absorbed better (Here) not only because of our countries outlook and their 'pre-selecting' themselves to come here, but second, about what their perception is of what they can get away with. Taking advantage of Euro/Scando-socialists and Post-colonial guilt is an easier target than trying to piss on less guilty don't try that shiite here Americans. It's quite amazing not just what the UK has tolerated, but the wholesale Jihadi/Islamist criminality in places like Sweden. If America had a Malmö (or even Oslo, Intifada Paris, or Londonistan), their would be Overwhelming public outcry and Strong government action. (Not to mention those exercising their second amendment rights)
Couldn't happen.

You are probably correct in the most part here. But correct only in so much as identifying the problems (perceived or otherwise) that the UK and Europe has had to deal with. The fact that Europe has HISTORY something America has very little of, obviously works in favour of American not having to come too terms with previous policy disasters. The carving up of large parts of the ME/and tampering in the Maghreb has consequences. American uniqueness in being a country that 'immigrants bought into' obviously works in your favour. Who would argue that point? Please explain what is a 'Londonstan'? (if you are basing your claim on a book by Melanie Phillips, don't insult yourself).

Though many EU Countries and leaders, including the aforementioned Cameron, have Started to put their foot down.... Right wing parties have risen and immigration cut in some places. The USA has had to do very little of this, though we do have an active FBI.

Considering America had endured the despicable attacks on 9/11 it is of no surprise that America turned into the fortress it has now become. The worlds only superpower (until China supplants you) has infinite resources and mindset verging on paranoia when it comes to personal safety. Look at what the FBI think,

"The FBI is fully engaged in the worldwide effort to counter terrorism. We have taken that fight to our adversaries' own sanctuaries in the far corners of the world—Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Europe, Asia, and Africa. We have also worked to uncover terror cells and supporters within the United States, as well as to disrupt terrorists' financial, communications, and operational lifelines at home and abroad."


FBI — FBI Budget for Fiscal Year 2012

Another example where your own agency (FBI) acknowledges the danger of terrorism 'homegrown' and 'abroad'. It seems your hypothesis of a them and us has no substance, thus pretty much defunct. To summarize, Global Jihad is just that, GLOBAL with very few countries immune from its reach. I think someone is somewhat out of their depth....better do some reading up:2wave:

I think that's enough to refute mbig, again.

Paul
 
Last edited:
Gunner's post is Incoherent wandering and doesn't refute anything.
He left off the whole point of my post...
me said:
I was Responding to Higgins who suggested his side should be doing it.
De-contexting a reply is dishonest. If you even know you're doing that is.

My reply was spawned by Higgins completely goofy take our respective immigrant problems. Of course he was using Your immigrants vs Saudi visa visitors here (ooops).. and didn't even mention home-grown 7/7 but, Irrelevantly that the largest terror attack was in the USA. Thougn not committed by our immigrants of any generation. Thus he's quite happy to let you post partisanly if aimlessly in his stead.
Which is thoroughly and still debunked. Higgins knew it, there was nothing to say, but gunner didn't get it, so hey, he took up the EU cross.. goofy though it was.. And now again is.

As to the rest, I already said "though we Do have an Active FBI.", (several/3? hundred arrests since 911) which is where you even got, NOT "refuted", FBI. FBI, by definition/mission, deals with Domestic issues. (and CIA Foreign).
Which I suppose is why it took you 3 days to [decide to] reply even though you had another post in between.
Your posts are always weak.
 
Last edited:
Quit this lying. You did indeed used to go on about Pew reports until I pointed out that you did not get your information from the Pew Research Centre but rather in the hate site Daniel Pikes. Guess he is not giving so much now. That is why thankfully you no longer answer my posts.

You were asked once before to give links to these sites when you started this personal hate baiting based on lies. All you could come up with was some orthodox Jewish site I had quoted two or three years previously which is split in two and the larger part has nothing to do with the radical splinter group which went off to Iran and at the time I knew nothing about.

You have lost all the argument here and all you have done is come back again and again like a parrot with the same old again and again. Realising you have lost the argument, you believe the way to go is to make untrue hateful accusations.

I never have nor never will support neo nazi's but I know people who supported the BNP and I know people who go to another site which I mainly use now and give thanks to White Nationalists, neo nazi's and I can tell you, they are of your lot.

Curious as to who his 'lot' would be. But I'm guessing anybody who isn't in lockstep with your bizarre Far Left view of the world and your obsession with Jews would be part of that 'lot', right?
 
Gunner's post is Incoherent wandering and doesn't refute anything.
He left off the whole point of my post...

Which is thoroughly and still debunked. Higgins knew it, there was nothing to say, but gunner didn't get it, so hey, he took up the EU cross.. goofy though it was.. And now again is.

As to the rest, I already said "though we Do have an Active FBI.", (several/3? hundred arrests since 911) which is where you even got, NOT "refuted", FBI. FBI, by definition/mission, deals with Domestic issues. (and CIA Foreign).
Which I suppose is why it took you 3 days to [decide to] reply even though you had another post in between.
Your posts are always weak.


It debunked fully your use of 'Finsbury Park Mosque' as some kind of evidence (that was without me explaining why security services kept it running). Old news, nothing of interest here.
I used your FBI point and showed their combating US home-grown terrorism. Something mbig et al like to pretend is NON existent (although the biggest terrorist org in Somalia came about under the banner of a home-grown American).
My post at the "3 day point" was from my phone (as explained in post) hence not getting into a protracted quote saga with you.
My using the latest ISAF casualty is very much pertinent, in adding context to who it is actually putting their life on the line.
Once again the rest of your post is simple conjecture.

Paul
 
Curious as to who his 'Lot' would be.

Isn't he that strange fellow who offered up his daughters to be gang raped, and then later on ended up having sex with them after his town was destroyed by fire and his wife became rather salty?
 
Isn't that more of that Jewish propaganda?;)
 
I haven't even looked at her links. I pay them no attention since she does not concern herself with finding responsible sites and doesn't care.

Trying to bring the thread back from a discussion of a poster and back to the subject of muslim immigrants.. the link Alexa posted shows that you are not telling the truth - the "Centre for American Progress" describes itself as "an independent nonpartisan educational institute dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through progressive ideas and action."

Elsewhere it's described by Time magazine as "the most influential independent organization in Obama's nascent Washington"

So, like I said - the rhetoric you and some of your anti European allies use in this and other threads is part of a widespread "Islamophobia network"
 
Back
Top Bottom