Well at least you are honest.
I don't, that isn't the topic. The topic is you calling anyone who objective and moderate on the issue an anti-semite.
And I used words that were correct in the circumstances, and Wiggen partly proved that.
Canada is no doubt closer to the US than the rest of us. I have noticed a growing pro-Israel feeling on the British and Aussie right in a short number of years. Unfortunately I think a lot of it has to do with a growing fear and dislike of Muslims and Islam based on what is being said. Some of it is simply based on assimilation to the US right.
Sure there is. You do not have to wrong the people and do them great injustices because of who rules them. Indeed this doesn't help them.
I'm saying the settlements are utterly separate from these. You do not get away with injustices because of a nation's lack of women's or gay rights. We have no right to take property in Iran or even North Korea because of their regimes.
Utter, propagandist nonsense. If I started taking your land or land in province and building on it and refused to recognise Canada's government in favour of Britain's you'd be annoyed. You have just given a completely non-objective viewpoint. But anyway, discussion of these topics is not allowed here.
I ignored Alexa saying that because she was the one who had been trying to insult UKIP without ever giving more than vague accusations and even vaguer evidence. She, Peter and Manc still have given nothing else. This is different, this is specifically not allowed.
I vaguely recall saying you implied something you did imply.
Those aren't the rules. Or at the very best it is a very minor rule that is hardly ever enforced. UKIP and Britain's isolation from Europe because of EU shenanigans are basically one topic or very close.
Okay, you want to do this. If you can't handle long words and complex concepts then that is your problem, not mine.
It is quite simple. Wiggen, just on cue, showed a textbook example of Yank foaming at the mouth at the mere hint there may be valid criticism of Israel and the American position on it.
Obviously I meant the American right and Canadian right are close. What this has to do with Harper defying Obama, in the sense you needed to repost the it, I'm not sure. It should have been quite clear to you.
I'm proud not to take simplistic and sloganistic positions on complex issues. I'm proud not to use such pretexts to support further injustices against this population, including women. I'm proud that I'm sensible enough to know that Israel, Palestine and the Middle East have little to do with British or Australian domestic politics and should have little to do with it. I support neither council boycotts of Israel, nor bringing in rightwing support for Israel as a major part of the conservative political platform.
Now you just look stupid and are yet again throwing around paranoid insults at anyone who is not pro-Israeli to the point of propagandist.
Says the man who just started to accuse anyone who isn't rabidly pro-Israel of being anti-semitic. What have I made but the mildest criticisms.
I've made up my mind the settlements and such include injustices. This shouldn't be a controversial statement. That you can see nothing wrong with them is simply that you are a brainwashed, unthinking propagandist. That you cannot discuss this without ranting about Europe and making implications about the holocausts shows what a paltry and silly position you have.
Or you could calm down and realise that in the context of the discussion it was natural to mention settlements and not go into detail about what you are talking about. You haven't really got to the point. You solution is to help these women and gays by further injustices, hostility and neglect.
Yes, I know.
Oh, poor Grant. I'm sure they have evening classes in basic English in Canada, they might help you with these long words. Just try not to sling random insults like anti-semitic or typical Europeans at them. I know it comes naturally to you, but try your hardest to suppress it, there's a good boy.
The sooner you start thinking the more sense you might make.
A Australian Coalition PM probably wouldn't make such a strident public position, though of course the newspapers may have been overdoing the event.
I see you have discovered a new word and want to get the most out of it before you forget it.
What? Try again, breath calmly and try and make sense. I tend not to speak a lot about 'human rights' in other parts of the world. My lecture circle on Laos didn't sell as well as possible. No doubt you are right now perfecting your stand up act; judging by your recent posts.
Yes, well you see, when you insult people it often happens that they feel you are insulting them. On another topic, when it rains, you tend to get wet ( I mean wetter than you are already).
You see, when people discuss things there is usually a context. The context was about Israel, not what some random Arab country did to its people and which all its people need to be punished for.
In other news, when someone burgles my house it doesn't take me that long to be annoyed at them, despite whatever injustices they may have suffered.
Well, we all know that you're doing your best with your posts Grant.
Why are you so obsessed with the quote system? Did you invent it?
| Moderator's Warning: |
 Let's cease the personal attacks and get back on topic. |