• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Making anti-Muslim sentiment mainstream

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gardener said:
... For the mention of his religion to have any merit in your defense of Islamsm....
Click to expand...

simply mentioning the simple fact that the Norway terrorist is a Christian and Islamophobic.......... is actually defending Islamism????????

wow. just wow. that's some nonesense you posted.
 
Last edited:
Thunder said:
simply mentioning the simple fact that the Norway terrorist is a Christian and Islamophobic.......... is actually defending Islamism????????

.
Click to expand...

No, it is your attacking of Christianity in order to defend Islamism that represents such via your trying to whip up a false sense of moral equivalence between the two.
 
Gardener said:
No, it is your attacking of Christianity in order to defend Islamism that represents such via your trying to whip up a false sense of moral equivalence between the two.
Click to expand...

how does mentioning that this murderer is a Christian....count as defending Islamism?

your accusation is very offensive.
 
Gardener said:
Unintelligent tu toque arguments are inherently fallacious, yes.

For the mention of his religion to have any merit in your defense of Islamsm you would have to establish that he was engaging in these acts BECAUSE of religious motivation, as well as needing to establish a wider support mechanism for such actions within Christianity comparable to those that exist so undeniably within Islam.
Click to expand...

Some rightwingers only think murder is wrong when religion is the motive. They don't want to acknowledge the violence that christianity inspires.
 
Gardener said:
No, it is your attacking of Christianity in order to defend Islamism that represents such via your trying to whip up a false sense of moral equivalence between the two.
Click to expand...

I think tha's true, but few people can/will see it.
 
Grant said:
Perhaps there are some Muslims who don't want to live in peace with others. Has this possibility ever occurred to you?
Click to expand...
obviously, and i have not said otherwise. my reply was very clear. you're the one who said "everyone wants to live in peace with muslims". remember?

here, read again.

Serenity said:
everyone wants to live in peace with Muslims?

is that why the U.S. invokes its false sense of morality, freedom, and democracy (when it suits) by murdering hundreds of thousands of civillians by dropping bombs and killing them. does that sound peaceful to you? are you really surprised that there is a percentage of Muslims that hate us?
Click to expand...



Grant said:
So there was little of fundamental Islam until when? What's your dates?
Click to expand...

don't bother replying to me in future if you are not going to read my replies properly.... i never said there was little until now. what i did say was that while we are selectively spreading feedom and democracy when it suits, we are creating more Islamic fundamentalism. do you disagree?

Grant said:
Hard to believe.
Click to expand...

you said "You live in the UK, Serenity?? Western Europe for sure, right?" and i said no. because i don't.

why is that so hard to believe? what's your point?
 
Moderator's Warning:
This thread is flailing about in every direction. It has lost all semblance of focus and has devolved into the typical Muslim/Christian blame game with persistent personal spats. Enough of this.

Thread closed.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom