Page 8 of 12 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 112
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: Globval warming reality check

  1. #71
    Sage
    ptif219's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    08-18-11 @ 12:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    11,907
    Likes Received
    933 times
    Likes Given
    1202

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by iangb View Post
    I'm not saying that anyone is 'always right' or 'always wrong', I'm saying that you should judge predictions by looking at the evidence supporting them. Hansens earlier predictions were based on poor evidence; they were later shown to be false. The IPCC repor is based on very strong evidence, and is still being vindicated by more and more evidence that the earth is warming - see the medly of recent threads on the topic. As such, it makes more sense to trust the IPCCs predictions.
    You mean the lies they get caught in or maybe the manipulation of temp by where they put recording stations. IPCC is not reliable or credible. They are more about politics than they are science.
    my 2011 Ultra Limited[/SIGPIC]

  2. #72
    Lurker

    iangb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,311
    Likes Received
    1434 times
    Likes Given
    1227
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    You mean the lies they get caught in or maybe the manipulation of temp by where they put recording stations. IPCC is not reliable or credible. They are more about politics than they are science.
    'lies they got caught in' is a non seq. The temperature stations that were rated as 'good' by the skeptics give a practically identical dataset to the original one. The IPCC has the overwhelming support of the vast majority of scientists, and the main body of it has never been discredited. The job of the IPCC was to show the science to politicians, so I'd call it a 50/50 split.

    I've responded to all of these before, in different threads. Jumping about on a topic will get you nowhere, especially if you just return to already-covered ground.
    The truth may be out there, but lies are in your head. ~Terry Pratchett

  3. #73
    Sage
    ptif219's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    08-18-11 @ 12:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    11,907
    Likes Received
    933 times
    Likes Given
    1202

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by iangb View Post
    'lies they got caught in' is a non seq. The temperature stations that were rated as 'good' by the skeptics give a practically identical dataset to the original one. The IPCC has the overwhelming support of the vast majority of scientists, and the main body of it has never been discredited. The job of the IPCC was to show the science to politicians, so I'd call it a 50/50 split.

    I've responded to all of these before, in different threads. Jumping about on a topic will get you nowhere, especially if you just return to already-covered ground.
    Nice spin but the IPCC is run by the UN that is not credible and is a political body not a science institute. This is nothing more than politics and and a way to tax the world.

    Lord Monckton reports on Pachauri’s eye opening Copenhagen presentation | Watts Up With That?

    Peter Foster: IPCC meltdown - FP Comment

    IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie | The Beacon
    my 2011 Ultra Limited[/SIGPIC]

  4. #74
    Lurker

    iangb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,311
    Likes Received
    1434 times
    Likes Given
    1227
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    Nice spin but the IPCC is run by the UN that is not credible and is a political body not a science institute. This is nothing more than politics and and a way to tax the world.

    Lord Monckton reports on Pachauri’s eye opening Copenhagen presentation | Watts Up With That?

    Peter Foster: IPCC meltdown - FP Comment

    IPCC Insider Admits Climate Consensus Claim Was a Lie | The Beacon
    Which part of the IPCC do you deny? That the earth is getting warmer, or that we are the cause?
    The truth may be out there, but lies are in your head. ~Terry Pratchett

  5. #75
    Sage
    ptif219's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    08-18-11 @ 12:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    11,907
    Likes Received
    933 times
    Likes Given
    1202

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by iangb View Post
    Which part of the IPCC do you deny? That the earth is getting warmer, or that we are the cause?
    The lies and corruption that show they are not credible but just pushing an agenda and facts do not matter
    my 2011 Ultra Limited[/SIGPIC]

  6. #76
    Lurker

    iangb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,311
    Likes Received
    1434 times
    Likes Given
    1227
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    The lies and corruption that show they are not credible but just pushing an agenda and facts do not matter
    That wasn't my question.

    Which part of the IPCC do you deny? That the earth is getting warmer, or that we are the cause?

    You've shown countless times that you are ready to attack the messenger. Let's actually talk science.
    The truth may be out there, but lies are in your head. ~Terry Pratchett

  7. #77
    Sage
    ptif219's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    08-18-11 @ 12:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    11,907
    Likes Received
    933 times
    Likes Given
    1202

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by iangb View Post
    That wasn't my question.

    Which part of the IPCC do you deny? That the earth is getting warmer, or that we are the cause?

    You've shown countless times that you are ready to attack the messenger. Let's actually talk science.
    That it is caused by man and that man can do anything to stop it. It is about the money

    UN economists propose fast-track green taxes for $100 billion climate fund | Troy Media Corporation

    A leading group of economists meeting in Bonn recently to advise UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has called for a raft of new green taxes to raise the US$100 billion a year committed by the 110 participant nations who signed December’s Copenhagen Accord. The call won’t come as music to the ears of taxpayers globally – and particularly Canadian taxpayers.
    my 2011 Ultra Limited[/SIGPIC]

  8. #78
    Lurker

    iangb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,311
    Likes Received
    1434 times
    Likes Given
    1227
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    That it is caused by man and that man can do anything to stop it. It is about the money

    UN economists propose fast-track green taxes for $100 billion climate fund | Troy Media Corporation

    A leading group of economists meeting in Bonn recently to advise UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has called for a raft of new green taxes to raise the US$100 billion a year committed by the 110 participant nations who signed December’s Copenhagen Accord. The call won’t come as music to the ears of taxpayers globally – and particularly Canadian taxpayers.
    You do realise that all that tax money will be spent, yes? The government is not profiting from this; the only ones who will gain monetarily will be the 'green start-ups' who provide the next wave of innovations.

    But enough of messenger-shooting/defending. You've said you don't think that global warming is caused by man, and as such you don't think that man can stop global warming. Seeing as your second premise rests heavily on the first one, let's look at that. If we just focus on one greenhouse gas - CO2, which of the following do you deny?

    1. Man has released large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere in recent times.
    2. CO2 has a warming effect
    3. (from 1. and 2.) The CO2 which man has released into the atmosphere has had a warming effect.
    4. (from 3) This warming effect is described as AGW.
    The truth may be out there, but lies are in your head. ~Terry Pratchett

  9. #79
    Sage
    ptif219's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    melbourne florida
    Last Seen
    08-18-11 @ 12:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    11,907
    Likes Received
    933 times
    Likes Given
    1202

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by iangb View Post
    You do realise that all that tax money will be spent, yes? The government is not profiting from this; the only ones who will gain monetarily will be the 'green start-ups' who provide the next wave of innovations.

    But enough of messenger-shooting/defending. You've said you don't think that global warming is caused by man, and as such you don't think that man can stop global warming. Seeing as your second premise rests heavily on the first one, let's look at that. If we just focus on one greenhouse gas - CO2, which of the following do you deny?

    1. Man has released large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere in recent times.
    2. CO2 has a warming effect
    3. (from 1. and 2.) The CO2 which man has released into the atmosphere has had a warming effect.
    4. (from 3) This warming effect is described as AGW.
    So how much of the warming is caused by man? How much will the temp decrease by going green?

    I have no problem cutting back on pollution but these scare tactics of global warming show it is a hoax. The manipulation and lies of the GW community make this whole thing not credible and unbelievable.
    my 2011 Ultra Limited[/SIGPIC]

  10. #80
    Lurker

    iangb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,311
    Likes Received
    1434 times
    Likes Given
    1227
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Globval warming reality check

    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    So how much of the warming is caused by man? How much will the temp decrease by going green?

    I have no problem cutting back on pollution but these scare tactics of global warming show it is a hoax. The manipulation and lies of the GW community make this whole thing not credible and unbelievable.
    That wasn't my question, either; you're back to shooting the messenger. Which of the following do you deny?

    1. Man has released large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere in recent times.
    2. CO2 has a warming effect
    3. (from 1. and 2.) The CO2 which man has released into the atmosphere has had a warming effect.
    4. (from 3) This warming effect is described as AGW.
    The truth may be out there, but lies are in your head. ~Terry Pratchett

Page 8 of 12 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •