- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 50,151
- Reaction score
- 15,451
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
If you reread my statement,Oh, you didnt actually CALL it a conspiracy.
You just alluded to it, suggesting that NOAA stopped reporting because the data went the way you think they dont want to report.
And, of course, you dont think its a conspiracy... it just 'raises questions'. Much like palentologists not being able to find transitional fossils 'raises questions' about evolution, and how clinical studies showing spinal manipulation cures diabetes but isnt mentioned by medicine 'raises questions' about a conspiracy to ban chiropractic medicine from helping people.
I did not speculate as to why NOAA did not report on the Brest, France station after July 2010,
Only that they did.
Trends in high signal to noise ratio environments are difficult,
Worse when all of the data is not presented.
NOAA choose to stop reporting Brest France in 2010, perhaps because since 2010,
the sea level has dropped by more than 2 cm.