That's a good example of your act.
This isn't a scientific forum, you aren't a scientist, and the scientific community has accepted the theory.
You can fake it all you want, but at the end of the day you're a propagandist who can't walk the walk.
You have not described what you think the ECS would be for doubling the CO2 level and support that conclusion
with ether citations or math.
The IPCC publishes a range (and a very large range at that) of 1.5 to 4.5 C, with an input of 1.2 C from the
greenhouse effect of doubling the CO2 level.
When you say the scientific community has accepted the theory, you should perhaps identify which theory you are speaking of.
The Scientific community does mostly agree that adding greenhouse gasses causes some warming, but that was not really in question.
What is questioned, is the amount of warming from a doubling of CO2.
The recent Physics says that doubling the CO2 level will create an energy imbalance of 3.71 watts per meter square (Wm-2),
and this would cause the surface troposphere system temperature to increase by 1.2 C.
That is the Science portion of the IPCC prediction.
The IPCC goes on to say they believe that amplified feedbacks exists that would add
between .3 and 3.3 C of additional warming to the 1.2 C.
So Science 1.2 C
Belief .3C to 3.3C
What is real? The prediction based on actual observed data, places the ECS at between 1.8 and 2 C.
The last IPCC report AR5 did not state a best estimate of ECS, but an article from many of the lead authors,
places the best estimate at about 2 C.
https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/eth...documents/group/climphys/knutti/otto13nat.pdf
