• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why I Choose to Challenge Climate Change Deniers

Gimmesometruth said:
First off, I'm not "yuz guyz", second, yer in no position to be talking about deception when you still can't even admit to your original lie.
Click to expand...

You sound just like every global warming alarmist that I have run into.

The term " you guys " is very accurate.
 
RetiredUSN said:
Because Norfolk is sinking...period. It has already been proven.

OMG.............can you please explain how a tide can change in certain parts of the coast but not others? Do you mean that the water isn't self leveling, or is there some phenomenon that only you know about? Did you bother reading your reply before you sent it out. If the tides go up in Norfolk, they have to go up in others areas as well.

But, regardless of your foolishness, the tides in my area haven't changed one bit in 30 years that I can visually see. I have the same marking on my pier that have been there since 1986 and the tide only changes in height during a full moon, and storms.
Click to expand...

Yep. Sea level rise will not be uniform all over the world.

It's a science thing- you wouldn't understand.

http://climate.nasa.gov/blog/239
 
Threegoofs said:
Yep. Sea level rise will not be uniform all over the world.

It's a science thing- you wouldn't understand.

http://climate.nasa.gov/blog/239
Click to expand...

Oh...I do understand. Measurable levels will always average out do to gravity and pressure. I am surprised that a very smart know it all like yourself wouldn't understand.
 
RetiredUSN said:
Oh...I do understand. Measurable levels will always average out do to gravity and pressure. I am surprised that a very smart know it all like yourself wouldn't understand.
Click to expand...

As the link showed, levels will not always average out, due to salinity, currents, prevailing winds, and density.

In fact, that's specifically why I posted the link you obviously didn't read and/or comprehend.

I know it might seem like I know it all, but it probably just seems that way because I actually read things, unlike some people.
 
Threegoofs said:
As the link showed, levels will not always average out, due to salinity, currents, prevailing winds, and density.

In fact, that's specifically why I posted the link you obviously didn't read and/or comprehend.

I know it might seem like I know it all, but it probably just seems that way because I actually read things, unlike some people.
Click to expand...

LOL...it's makes me even more convinced that you have no idea what you are talking about. Salinity, currents, prevailing winds, and density are dispersed over a short period and the water will level out with the rest of the oceans/seas/bays/and inlets.

So again, please tell me how one region of the world have sustained highers levels of water than others.

Stop trying to make yourself seem wise through snarky
 
RetiredUSN said:
LOL...it's makes me even more convinced that you have no idea what you are talking about. Salinity, currents, prevailing winds, and density are dispersed over a short period and the water will level out with the rest of the oceans/seas/bays/and inlets.

So again, please tell me how one region of the world have sustained highers levels of water than others.

Stop trying to make yourself seem wise through snarky
Click to expand...

I actually supplied a link to the information.

Maybe you're not aware that when you click on those colored words, it opens up a webpage in a browser which is there for you to read.

Try it sometime.
 
I don't need global warming to care about the environment.... though that's what it seems to be for so many people...
 
bubbabgone said:
Yes there is a reason and it's a damn good one too.
I ****ed up.
Here's the intended link ...

Why I Choose to Challenge Climate Change Deniers | RealClearPolitics

Thanks.
Click to expand...

You will like this.

Opinion
[h=1]Bill Nye’s Scientism[/h] by WILLIE SOON AND ISTVÁN MARKÓ (via Breitbart) There is a saying in the world of science that if scientific facts do not support your arguments then stop shouting. It is thus a waste of time to appeal to “scientism” or to rely on popular spokespersons like Al Gore or Bill Nye to make it…
 
Jack Hays said:
You will like this.

Opinion
[h=1]Bill Nye’s Scientism[/h] by WILLIE SOON AND ISTVÁN MARKÓ (via Breitbart) There is a saying in the world of science that if scientific facts do not support your arguments then stop shouting. It is thus a waste of time to appeal to “scientism” or to rely on popular spokespersons like Al Gore or Bill Nye to make it…
Click to expand...

Whoa, does this bring it home right here at DP or Watt (spelling intentional) ...

"It will do more harm to your own self-esteem than the pretension of winning an argument by appealing to authority or popularity. Increasingly, we are seeing more and more outrageous and aggressive anti-scientific claims that anyone who is not willing to embrace the dangerous global warming bandwagon and to condemn its culprit, CO2, is actually the equivalent of a Holocaust Denier."

"... the predictions made by the climate models are akin to computer-assisted divinations."

"... ~1°C increase in the temperature anomaly registered since the past 150 years,..." (I had just noted something similar to 3G Jr. a few minutes ago.)

Cool find, jack.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom