Of course you expect me to reasonably "trust you" because you, a random person I don't know, told me to trust you.
I don't expect you t trust me, but my laughing at an article from Think Progress is not deserving of you coming back implying a creationist would have good material for me. Think Progress and the creationist are both low on the credibility list.
And of course I'm an amateur. I grasp the fundamentals, I understand the complex interaction of several systems that themselves are quite complex. I also have an inquisitive mind and a knack for logic and deduction.
Then I hope you consider my words when I do actually explain things.
I read journals. I have several subscriptions to journals, and read what the science says, rather than what some activist reporter from a punditry site like Think progress says. If you watch, will rarely link material outside of a peer reviewed paper.
My beliefs are my own, based on my solid understanding of the sciences, and several years studying the topics related to climate. I do not parrot what others say like most the warmers here.
Unfortunately, that knack is kinda knocking hard on some alarm bells at particular behaviors of yours, particularly mis-representing your own words and actions.
If yo say sio...
I don't need to ASSume it already. You already established you deny there was a solid investigation specifically on the man-caused effects on climate change here:
Then you have a severe comprehension problem.
Mankind has a profound effect of the climate. Please remove your confirmation bias, and read what I say. Not what you are already prejudiced into thinking I mean.
When, as I attempted to enlighten you, but unfortunately its gone right over your head, the entire theory developed over 120 years has focused on anthropogenic causes only.
Trust me. I have read such things before, and I was rather annoyed that you took things to a first grade level, when am so far ahead of that. So, I ignored that part of your material.
rather than link something you expect to school me with, why not determin if I already know it?
I hate repetitive things. I don't need such presentations thrown in my face when there is more than those basics.
This little important tidbit would have saved you a lot of trouble in disputing the reported findings that have been coming out the past 29 years or so which closely match predictions. Some aspects of the predicted change are happening faster than expected, others not as fast but on the whole, the observations match the predictions.
Anything with a trend can be correlated with another trend.
If you think its funny to throw information overload at someone, then I will start ignoring you. i don't need to read beginners material when I am so much farther along than that. If you think something is reverent, then quote that part of it, and explain why.
If you expect someone to read the entire link you post, you are batty. I have better things t do than waste my time searching for what you think is pertinent.
Maybe you were tired, maybe you need more coffee, but you denied the essential premise the theory development and research was built around over 120 years was adequately addressed, and when I replied with an attempt to enlighten you that it was the case that the entire theory was developed around human-caused climate change only, you threw a hissy fit and declared you already knew that and didn't need to be reminded. And yet you are stuck believing that wasn't actually considered.
I didn't deny but one specific aspect. Maybe you should reread my remarks, and tell me specifically what you think I denied.
Maybe you need to smll the coffee...
You're in some sort of weird self-inconsistent logical circle. Adding embarrassingly hollow boasts about your mastery of science along with a belief random strangers should trust you just because you tell them they should whilst also flubbing basic logic does not help my level of respect for your 'mastery.'
But, I'll try to give you the benefit of the doubt. Tired and/or out of coffee?
All these accusations,but no specific facts to claim?
Please...
Please don't be a flamebaiter or a troll. We have too many here already.
