• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mega droughts of the Past Were Worse

Wait. Why are we limited? Lots of things cause climate changes.

I was being comical, about how silly blaming greenhouse gasses is.

Wasn't that apparent?
 
Stick around. Every single storm, flood, drought, highest recorded temperature, highest recorded temperature on a Tuesday afternoon, lowest temperature etc. is given as evidence that the world is about to end with all of civilisation flooded. Or worse.

I prefer to listen to science and not whacko hyberbole cooked up by Limbaugh et al.
 
I prefer to listen to science and not whacko hyberbole cooked up by Limbaugh et al.

What does Limbaugh say about it?

Since you listen to him, please tell those of us who don't.
 
What does Limbaugh say about it?

Since you listen to him, please tell those of us who don't.

He describes "warmists" the way you do. "Hurf durf they think the world is going to end."

I can respond with "Har har silly 'skeptics' think it doesn't matter how many people are hurt as long as businesses make more profit."
 
He describes "warmists" the way you do. "Hurf durf they think the world is going to end."

I can respond with "Har har silly 'skeptics' think it doesn't matter how many people are hurt as long as businesses make more profit."

Wow.

Which gossip column did you get that from?

link please.
 
Wow.

Which gossip column did you get that from?

link please.

Where did the right-wing media get their nonsense from? "Warmists" don't think the world is going to end.
 
Where did the right-wing media get their nonsense from? "Warmists" don't think the world is going to end.

I think you're going off the rails.

You might be ably to find a local psychiatrist with a web search.
 
Where did the right-wing media get their nonsense from? "Warmists" don't think the world is going to end.

I'm sorry that you believe everyone believes what the left or right wing pundits say.

Just because you believe what the left wing pundits say, doesn't mean everyone else believes a pundit.

I have never even heard a pundit say what you are saying they say.

I think either you are making that horse pucky up, or blindly following in someone elses horse pucky.
 
I'm sorry that you believe everyone believes what the left or right wing pundits say.

Just because you believe what the left wing pundits say, doesn't mean everyone else believes a pundit.

I have never even heard a pundit say what you are saying they say.

I think either you are making that horse pucky up, or blindly following in someone elses horse pucky.

A pundit? The sentiment I am referring to came up in this thread. And a hundred others on these message boards.

Stick around. Every single storm, flood, drought, highest recorded temperature, highest recorded temperature on a Tuesday afternoon, lowest temperature etc. is given as evidence that the world is about to end with all of civilisation flooded. Or worse.
 
Let me see if I understand this...
If it happened in the past, we shouldn't do anything to try to alleviate a problem that exists today.
 
Let me see if I understand this...
If it happened in the past, we shouldn't do anything to try to alleviate a problem that exists today.

Do you think we can beat mother nature on this one ?

Lets say we spend the trillions on it the alarmists want and we don't.

What will all the sacrifice have been for ?
 
A pundit? The sentiment I am referring to came up in this thread. And a hundred others on these message boards.

Repeating the gist of what the leftist pundits says, from this thread? Then why did you invoke Limbaugh?

Is that another logical fallacy you are doing?

Are you saying none of the left pundits speak of doom and gloom scenarios?

The frequently do just that.
 
He describes "warmists" the way you do. "Hurf durf they think the world is going to end."

I can respond with "Har har silly 'skeptics' think it doesn't matter how many people are hurt as long as businesses make more profit."

As a result of the mis-application of bad science we now have a situation where vast quantities of food are used as fuel. The poorest billion people on the planet are slowly starving. The death rate of these people has been increased greatly for no good reason. If you live on a dollar a day or less then the rise in food prices is disasterous.

Tens of millions of people are dying each year due to this.

In Europe the madness about CO2 has caused a policy of using deisel to fuel cars. This is causing tens of thousands of deaths in the UK alone.

CO2 is a none problem.
 
Let me see if I understand this...
If it happened in the past, we shouldn't do anything to try to alleviate a problem that exists today.

No. If it happened in the past then it is not likely that our actions are the cause of it.

So rather than waste vast amounts of money on not using the best methods of doing stuff we should instead use the best methods we have to build stuff which makes it possible to cope with what nature throws at us.
 
No. If it happened in the past then it is not likely that our actions are the cause of it.

So rather than waste vast amounts of money on not using the best methods of doing stuff we should instead use the best methods we have to build stuff which makes it possible to cope with what nature throws at us.

Adaptation was the word I think you were reaching for Tim.

Alarmists are desperate to deny us access to the affordable resources that will allow us to easily do so

I often think they actively want more of us dead such is their heavily indoctrinated green guilt
 
Adaptation was the word I think you were reaching for Tim.

Alarmists are desperate to deny us access to the affordable resources that will allow us to easily do so

I often think they actively want more of us dead such is their heavily indoctrinated green guilt

I don't actually think it's guilt.

I detect a common thread in communist/green/religious fundimentalism; The wish to destroy the present world and society. The want to revert to a previous golden age. The cultural revolution of Mao. The simple actions of smashing everything. The wish to kill lots of people and have power.

Thus there is a vast amount of "don't do x" and a maga silence about what they actually want done.
 
As a result of the mis-application of bad science we now have a situation where vast quantities of food are used as fuel. The poorest billion people on the planet are slowly starving. The death rate of these people has been increased greatly for no good reason. If you live on a dollar a day or less then the rise in food prices is disasterous.

Tens of millions of people are dying each year due to this.

In Europe the madness about CO2 has caused a policy of using deisel to fuel cars. This is causing tens of thousands of deaths in the UK alone.

CO2 is a none problem.

Tens of millions dying due to ethanol? I suppose you can support that hysteria.
 
Tens of millions dying due to ethanol? I suppose you can support that hysteria.

Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis | Environment | The Guardian
Rising food prices have pushed 100m people worldwide below the poverty line, estimates the World Bank, and have sparked riots from Bangladesh to Egypt. Government ministers here have described higher food and fuel prices as "the first real economic crisis of globalisation".

BBC NEWS | Americas | Leaders warn on biofuels and food
Speaking at the UN in New York, Bolivian President Evo Morales said the development of biofuels harmed the world's most impoverished people.

And President Alan Garcia of Peru said using land for biofuels was putting food out of reach for the poor.

Glad to see some information does get out there sometimes.
 
A secret report we can't show you claims an effect 20 times higher than previously thought. You can trust us!

Even if that 75% number is correct, you still need to link that to tens of millions of deaths.

100 million forced into the desperate state of poverty. For the billion already there even worse.

If you were tyong to live on $1 a day how would you feel about a 75% rise in the cost of the small amount of food you could not afford to buy? How would you feel about watching another child die of hunger?
 
100 million forced into the desperate state of poverty. For the billion already there even worse.

If you were tyong to live on $1 a day how would you feel about a 75% rise in the cost of the small amount of food you could not afford to buy? How would you feel about watching another child die of hunger?

You switched to appeal to emotion instead of supporting your assertion. I've had enough of it, so I'll just stop you here:

1) Only about 9 million people die each year from "hunger and hunger-related diseases," not "tens of millions." So even attributing literally every one of those deaths to ethanol, you're short
2) 75% of families in the poverty circumstances you refer to grow their own food.
3) Undernourishment rates have been declining for decades

2015 World Hunger and Poverty Facts and Statistics by WHES
 
Back
Top Bottom