• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exxon Climate Change Denial Fed Investigation?

It gets better and better.


[h=1]What did ExxonMobil Know and when did they know it? (Part 1)[/h]Guest post by David Middleton Maybe ExxonMobil should file a RICO lawsuit against the “Shukla 20”, Inside Climate, the LA Times and this gentleman… Exxon Knew Everything There Was to Know About Climate Change by the Mid-1980s—and Denied It And thanks to their willingness to sucker the world, the world is now a chaotic mess.…
Continue reading →
 
It never ceases to amaze my how many people listen to these pundits, when time and again, they are proven to be unethical liars of the truth.

i read the documents listed when this RICO thing first came out, and saw the pundits were full of horse pucky.

We should be more concerned of the global warming by the hot air generated by pundits, then what they rail against.
 
Climate FAIL / Climate News / Energy / Environment / Politics
[h=1]What did ExxonMobil Know and when did they know it? (Part 3, Exxon: The Fork Not Taken)[/h] Guest post by David Middleton This just keeps getting more hilarious… Exxon Confirmed Global Warming Consensus in 1982 with In-House Climate Models The company chairman would later mock climate models as unreliable while he campaigned to stop global action to reduce fossil fuel emissions. Lisa Song, Neela Banerjee, David Hasemyer Sep 22, 2015 Steve Knisely…
 
[h=1]The “Well-funded campaign” myth[/h] Posted on 20 Oct 15 by Paul Matthews • 18 Comments
Myths, fairy stories and inventions regarding climate sceptics are often presented and promoted by climate scientists and their hangers-on in the social sciences, in the media, in NGOs and in politics. One thing that we’ll be doing on this blog is debunking some of these myths. One of the most wide-spread myths is that climate …
 
Wouldn't it be funny if energy companies stopped giving to the universities of hypocrisy?
 
Lord of Planar said:
Wouldn't it be funny if energy companies stopped giving to the universities of hypocrisy?
Click to expand...
They are not really "giving" them anything, but paying for research.
For the researcher perspective the oil companies,(or any private company grants) come with
confidentially agreements, which generally limit publishing.
On the plus side, many times the research dollars come with lots of free equipment.
 
longview said:
They are not really "giving" them anything, but paying for research.
For the researcher perspective the oil companies,(or any private company grants) come with
confidentially agreements, which generally limit publishing.
On the plus side, many times the research dollars come with lots of free equipment.
Click to expand...

I know.

But there are so many universities. If a university is going to have people on their payroll that speak out against energy funded studies, claiming it skews the results, then the energy companies can easily find other universities to support.

Let these people see what their freedom of ignorant speech does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom