MrVicchio

If that were the case then this law wouldn't have been passed now would it have?

__________________
Us Navy Veteran. AerographersMate 2nd Class (AW) Mr.Vicchio, At your service!

1069

It's not the job of public schools to teach anything positive about them.

__________________
"I do love this idea that one can scream and scream and scream, with that utopia just one more scream away."
~ Scucca

winston53660

Of course it is teaching positive things about families heterosexual included.

__________________
http://winstoncreative.com/

The silenced majority

"Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" have been banned from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose.

Of course they aren't teaching anything derogatory about the traditional family by banning the words "mom and dad" and "husband and wife" I don't know what the hell I was thinking.


This is exact how Cultural Marxism works.

It's stated intention, by those who started the movement, was to destroy anything related to traditional culture by claiming mass-victimization created by the mainstream culture's dominance of oppressed minority groups. The constant criticism of traditional culture was designed to destroy it not reform it; just has traditional Marxism had tried to do with capitalism.

In this case, it's homosexuals and the trans-gendered who had been victimized by being forced to go to public schools that were simply institutions that foster a climate of heterosexual male dominance. And all will not be right until the government and the agents of social change get involved to make everything faaaair.

__________________
'To begin with unlimited freedom, is to end with unlimited despotism." ~ Dostoevsky

MrVicchio

Why not? Why is it a bad thing?

winston53660

Oh for crying out loud that is what some kooks claimed and kooky "the sky is falling" WND reported. I really don't see any credence for their claims.

1069

No. It is a morally neutral thing, and public schools have no business presenting it in any but a morally neutral light.

MrVicchio

Ahh, morally ambiguous. No wonder half the kids I work with and around here are the University are incapable of understanding good and evil...

1069

I find it difficult to fathom that someone employed by a university has trouble stringing a grammatical and coherent sentence together.
What are parents paying for, these days?

The silenced majority

Sb777 bans anything that could be determined as being biased or derogatory toward alternative lifestyle.

All that needs to happen is one gay or transgendered student to claim he/she's feels slighted by any mentions of traditional families, heterosexuality or normal sexuality in the classroom to get the tort litigation ball rolling.

This is exactly how it works.

The major objective isn't as much about putting gays and transgendered on an even-keel with everyone else as it's sold, as much as it's about forcing people more and more to obey a leftist agenda of controlling a section of society (this time it's schools) by using the fear of being tagged as homophobic, bigoted or "mean" as a method to silence the opposition.