Quote:
Sec. 8. Review.
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.
|
Is this passage as shady as it sounds? What possible reason could there be to put the bailout above the authority of the courts? Is this even constitutional? I'm not ready to whip out the tin foil hat just yet, but after eight years of legal acrobatics the wording of this bill troubles me. Anybody have some insight?
Linear Mode
Main
Extras
