• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rewriting the Tax Code for a Stronger, More Equitable Economy

Lafayette

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
9,594
Reaction score
2,072
Location
France
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
From the Roosevelt Institute, Rewriting the Tax Code for a Stronger, More Equitable Economy


Excerpt:
Over the last 40 years, corporate influence and trickle-down ideology have pervaded the tax code, resulting in large tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy. These low rates have failed to deliver the widespread growth that was promised, and the results for the typical American have been disastrous: Wealth at the top skyrocketed with no equivalent boom in growth. At the same time, median wages have remained largely stagnant, and the United States now ranks 10th out of 13 OECD countries in upward mobility. To correct our current trajectory, America needs a wholesale reconsideration of tax incentives and their impact on various economic activities.

In this brief based on previously published work by Roosevelt Institute Chief Economist Joseph E. Stiglitz, we propose a new paradigm for thinking about the tax system: Rather than rewarding bad behavior and using the tax and transfer system to redress poor outcomes after the fact, the tax code should be structured to encourage productive economic activities and a more equitable pre-tax distribution. The tax code can be used to adjust incentives and curb shortsighted, risky, and otherwise undesirable economic behavior.

Loopholes should be closed, high taxes should be levied on harmful activities, and tax cuts and subsidies should be focused on productive investment that promotes inclusive growth and general well-being.

'Nuff said?

Of course not, we've had a tax-system (since Reckless Ronnie manipulated upper-income tax-rates massively downwards in the 1980s) that has bled the working man/woman at the lower wage level to create extreme Income Inequity at the higher-level of income range - as can be seen from Prof. Piketty's research: Piketty's History Top 10Percent Pre-Tax Income Share – Europe and US.

Which is from where the money comes spent on elections to assure the Replicants maintain control of both chambers of Congress ....
 
Last edited:
Of course not, we've had a tax-system (since Reckless Ronnie manipulated upper-income tax-rates massively downwards in the 1980s) that has bled the working man/woman at the lower wage level to create extreme Income Inequity at the higher-level of income range .

absurd of course:

1)under Reagan the top 1% paid 20% of all federal taxes, now they pay 44%. 44% is bigger than 20%!!!

2) inequality is caused by liberal taxes, unions, deficits, illegals, and the liberal war on the family and schools. Now do you understand?
 
Back
Top Bottom